From: "Luis Miguel García" <ktech-39ZsbGIQGT7e5aOfsHch1g@public.gmane.org>
To: David Ford
<david+challenge-response-qokYbnrgTHEgsBAKwltoeQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: akpm-LL/9OlyS9hIAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
a.verweij-oe7qfRrRQfeEZXFvZSAUrfP6llvjuJOh@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 22:27:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4022B55B.1090309@wanadoo.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40229D2C.20701-qokYbnrgTHEgsBAKwltoeQ@public.gmane.org>
David Ford wrote:
> I have the same problem. I "solved" it a while ago by mucking with
> the AGP stuff. IIRC, it was turning off AGP fast writes or 8x or
> something similar in cmos. Went from incredibly broken to stable
> instantly. I'll check my cmos settings in a bit and refresh my memory.
>
> What patches are you using?
I'm using nforce2-apic.patch and nforce2-disconnect-quirk.patch that
Andrew Morton have sent to me. I think they have been included in
previous mm kernels but now are droped because they caused some
temperature problems for some people with no nforce motherboards.
If you want it, I can send it to you.
By the way, is anyone involved in solving the IO-APIC thing in nforce
motherboards? Anyone trying a different approach? Anyone contacting
nvidia about this problem?
> p.s. reiserfs is pretty useless against crashes. hundreds of files
> around the harddrive get messed up everytime the machine locks
> up...files that haven't been used in weeks, as well as files opened
> read-only, i.e. libraries.
I don't think this could be a reiserfs problem, because all the computer
gets frezzed and locked, but perhaps someone at Namesys can realize why
files gets deleted all over the hard disc.
Thanks.
Luis Miguel Garcia
>
> p.s. reiserfs is pretty useless against crashes. hundreds of files
> around the harddrive get messed up everytime the machine locks
> up...files that haven't been used in weeks, as well as files opened
> read-only, i.e. libraries.
>
> Luis Miguel García wrote:
>
>> (sorry with my sucking english)
>>
>> ok, let me know if you know for me to test something with this newer
>> mm kernels.
>>
>> by the way, yes, I'm experiencing the lockups. Not with heavy io, but
>> almost when I boot and enter X. The system gets completly frozzened
>> and the HD led keps on. When I reboot with a sane kernel, I found
>> several files from my /home directory are deleted or filled with
>> garbage.
>>
>> Now, I patch each kernel I use with the two patches Andrew sent to me
>> and I'm having no problems.
>>
>> Actually i'm running 2.6.2-ck1 + nforce-patches and the temperature
>> of the system is 55º while idle, and 631 while compiling (only cpu
>> fan, no case fans). I don't know if it's high (some people reported
>> high temperatures with this patches) but it runs very well this way.
>>
>> If you want for me to test some patches or something, please drop me
>> a note.
>>
>> Thanks a lot...
>>
>> Luis Miguel García
>>
>> P.S.: by the way, why am I getting strage "arabesque" characters when
>> I reply to your emails? Perhaps something with wrong encoding?
>>
>>> This is interesting, I will test it myself later on. At one point Len
>>> admitted to owning "foreign hardware :p" so maybe this could get
>>> resolved.
>>>
>>> Personally I haven't tried kernels with newer forcedeth drivers,
>>> because I
>>> can no longer explicitely set the power state of the NIC to D3. The
>>> machine complains about irqs (new debugging code since forcedeth
>>> v.20 or
>>> so) and will not powerdown.
>>>
>>> On another note, have you noticed lockups of your system with heavy io?
>>> Think of fsck'ing, burning cdroms, du on large dirs etc? Maybe it is
>>> helpful to set up a list of boards and document what works or
>>> doesn't work
>>> with which kernel. For instance the lockups with heavy io seem to be
>>> resolved here if I leave APIC from my kernel.
>>>
>>> Arjen
>>>
>>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-15] Luis Miguel Garc?a wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Hi:
>>>>>
>>>>> Since Andrew Morton picked up latest acpi bk updates, nforce
>>>>> motherboards have problems, mainly with ethernet adapters.
>>>>> Reporters say that with acpi=off, the problm gets fixed, so we
>>>>> think the problem could be acpi. Some more useful info:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Luis Miguel Garc?a wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> >> When I try to boot with latest mm series (such as actual
>>>>>>> rc3-mm1 or
>>>>>>> >> rc2-mm2), my nforce ethernet device doesn't works. It worked
>>>>>>> in the past
>>>>>>> >> with the forcedeth reverse engineered driver but now it keeps
>>>>>>> for 30 or
>>>>>>> >> more seconds halted (at boot) and then the network device
>>>>>>> dosn't run.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Here is the dmesg of rc3-mm1. Do you want for me to test
>>>>>>> something? Thanks!
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> P.S.: The ACPI related messages are larger that in rc3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My e100 on an nforce2 won't work in rc3-mm1.
>>>>> The "acpi=off" boot parameter makes it go.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And for the record, I can boot with that kernel and save one dmesg
>>>>> for you if you want. Only send me a request and I'll send it to you.
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S.: Sent any messages you want directly to me as i'm not
>>>>> subscribed to acpi-devel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Luis Miguel Garc?a
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> >Which part of nforce support are you talking about luis?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> >On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> >> Luis Miguel Garc?a <ktech-39ZsbGIQGT7e5aOfsHch1g@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>> > Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.2/2.6.2-mm1/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >> - Merged some page reclaim fixes from Nick and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikita. These yield some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >> performance improvements in low memory and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> heavy paging situations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>> > Andrew, do you know if this acpi pull down has nforce
>>>>>>>>> support fixed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> It doesn't appear that way.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> > Or perhaps it's even unnotified to the acpi team?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> I do not know. Sending them a bugzilla ID would help, if
>>>>>>> such a thing exists.
>>>>>>
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luis Miguel García" <ktech@wanadoo.es>
To: David Ford <david+challenge-response@blue-labs.org>
Cc: akpm@digeo.com, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.verweij@student.tudelft.nl
Subject: Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 22:27:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4022B55B.1090309@wanadoo.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40229D2C.20701@blue-labs.org>
David Ford wrote:
> I have the same problem. I "solved" it a while ago by mucking with
> the AGP stuff. IIRC, it was turning off AGP fast writes or 8x or
> something similar in cmos. Went from incredibly broken to stable
> instantly. I'll check my cmos settings in a bit and refresh my memory.
>
> What patches are you using?
I'm using nforce2-apic.patch and nforce2-disconnect-quirk.patch that
Andrew Morton have sent to me. I think they have been included in
previous mm kernels but now are droped because they caused some
temperature problems for some people with no nforce motherboards.
If you want it, I can send it to you.
By the way, is anyone involved in solving the IO-APIC thing in nforce
motherboards? Anyone trying a different approach? Anyone contacting
nvidia about this problem?
> p.s. reiserfs is pretty useless against crashes. hundreds of files
> around the harddrive get messed up everytime the machine locks
> up...files that haven't been used in weeks, as well as files opened
> read-only, i.e. libraries.
I don't think this could be a reiserfs problem, because all the computer
gets frezzed and locked, but perhaps someone at Namesys can realize why
files gets deleted all over the hard disc.
Thanks.
Luis Miguel Garcia
>
> p.s. reiserfs is pretty useless against crashes. hundreds of files
> around the harddrive get messed up everytime the machine locks
> up...files that haven't been used in weeks, as well as files opened
> read-only, i.e. libraries.
>
> Luis Miguel García wrote:
>
>> (sorry with my sucking english)
>>
>> ok, let me know if you know for me to test something with this newer
>> mm kernels.
>>
>> by the way, yes, I'm experiencing the lockups. Not with heavy io, but
>> almost when I boot and enter X. The system gets completly frozzened
>> and the HD led keps on. When I reboot with a sane kernel, I found
>> several files from my /home directory are deleted or filled with
>> garbage.
>>
>> Now, I patch each kernel I use with the two patches Andrew sent to me
>> and I'm having no problems.
>>
>> Actually i'm running 2.6.2-ck1 + nforce-patches and the temperature
>> of the system is 55º while idle, and 631 while compiling (only cpu
>> fan, no case fans). I don't know if it's high (some people reported
>> high temperatures with this patches) but it runs very well this way.
>>
>> If you want for me to test some patches or something, please drop me
>> a note.
>>
>> Thanks a lot...
>>
>> Luis Miguel García
>>
>> P.S.: by the way, why am I getting strage "arabesque" characters when
>> I reply to your emails? Perhaps something with wrong encoding?
>>
>>> This is interesting, I will test it myself later on. At one point Len
>>> admitted to owning "foreign hardware :p" so maybe this could get
>>> resolved.
>>>
>>> Personally I haven't tried kernels with newer forcedeth drivers,
>>> because I
>>> can no longer explicitely set the power state of the NIC to D3. The
>>> machine complains about irqs (new debugging code since forcedeth
>>> v.20 or
>>> so) and will not powerdown.
>>>
>>> On another note, have you noticed lockups of your system with heavy io?
>>> Think of fsck'ing, burning cdroms, du on large dirs etc? Maybe it is
>>> helpful to set up a list of boards and document what works or
>>> doesn't work
>>> with which kernel. For instance the lockups with heavy io seem to be
>>> resolved here if I leave APIC from my kernel.
>>>
>>> Arjen
>>>
>>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-15] Luis Miguel Garc?a wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Hi:
>>>>>
>>>>> Since Andrew Morton picked up latest acpi bk updates, nforce
>>>>> motherboards have problems, mainly with ethernet adapters.
>>>>> Reporters say that with acpi=off, the problm gets fixed, so we
>>>>> think the problem could be acpi. Some more useful info:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Luis Miguel Garc?a wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> >> When I try to boot with latest mm series (such as actual
>>>>>>> rc3-mm1 or
>>>>>>> >> rc2-mm2), my nforce ethernet device doesn't works. It worked
>>>>>>> in the past
>>>>>>> >> with the forcedeth reverse engineered driver but now it keeps
>>>>>>> for 30 or
>>>>>>> >> more seconds halted (at boot) and then the network device
>>>>>>> dosn't run.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Here is the dmesg of rc3-mm1. Do you want for me to test
>>>>>>> something? Thanks!
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> P.S.: The ACPI related messages are larger that in rc3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My e100 on an nforce2 won't work in rc3-mm1.
>>>>> The "acpi=off" boot parameter makes it go.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And for the record, I can boot with that kernel and save one dmesg
>>>>> for you if you want. Only send me a request and I'll send it to you.
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S.: Sent any messages you want directly to me as i'm not
>>>>> subscribed to acpi-devel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Luis Miguel Garc?a
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> >Which part of nforce support are you talking about luis?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> >On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> >> Luis Miguel Garc?a <ktech@wanadoo.es> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>> > Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.2/2.6.2-mm1/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >> - Merged some page reclaim fixes from Nick and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikita. These yield some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >> performance improvements in low memory and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> heavy paging situations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>> > Andrew, do you know if this acpi pull down has nforce
>>>>>>>>> support fixed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> It doesn't appear that way.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> > Or perhaps it's even unnotified to the acpi team?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> I do not know. Sending them a bugzilla ID would help, if
>>>>>>> such a thing exists.
>>>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-05 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-05 19:25 acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet Luis Miguel García
2004-02-05 19:25 ` [ACPI] " Luis Miguel García
[not found] ` <402298C7.5050405-39ZsbGIQGT7e5aOfsHch1g@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-05 19:44 ` David Ford
2004-02-05 19:44 ` [ACPI] " David Ford
[not found] ` <40229D2C.20701-qokYbnrgTHEgsBAKwltoeQ@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-05 21:27 ` Luis Miguel García [this message]
2004-02-05 21:27 ` Luis Miguel García
[not found] ` <4022B55B.1090309-39ZsbGIQGT7e5aOfsHch1g@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-05 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-05 23:40 ` [ACPI] " Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20040205154059.6649dd74.akpm-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-06 0:08 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 0:08 ` [ACPI] " Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 0:14 ` Craig Bradney
2004-02-06 0:14 ` [ACPI] " Craig Bradney
[not found] ` <1076026496.16107.23.camel-V9bJ71E8C7qMuHbpHUh99CT4j+jCus6s@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-06 0:22 ` Luis Miguel García
2004-02-06 0:22 ` [ACPI] " Luis Miguel García
[not found] ` <4022DE3C.1080905-39ZsbGIQGT7e5aOfsHch1g@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-06 0:38 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 0:38 ` [ACPI] " Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 0:46 ` Luis Miguel García
2004-02-06 0:58 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 1:01 ` Craig Bradney
2004-02-06 1:09 ` Luis Miguel García
2004-02-06 9:28 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 9:26 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 10:07 ` Craig Bradney
2004-02-06 10:40 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 9:44 ` Daniel Drake
2004-02-06 11:04 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 11:15 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 12:51 ` Craig Bradney
2004-02-06 13:10 ` Arjen Verweij
2004-02-06 13:20 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 13:34 ` Arjen Verweij
2004-02-06 13:41 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 13:43 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-06 11:08 ` Craig Bradney
[not found] ` <4022E3C8.4020704-39ZsbGIQGT7e5aOfsHch1g@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-06 0:59 ` Craig Bradney
2004-02-06 0:59 ` [ACPI] " Craig Bradney
2004-02-06 0:56 ` Craig Bradney
2004-02-06 0:56 ` [ACPI] " Craig Bradney
2004-02-06 23:33 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-02-06 23:33 ` [ACPI] " Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-02-07 2:50 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-07 6:39 ` Josh McKinney
2004-02-07 10:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0402070021210.12260-rsPqkUlH4Vdx0R2ya2r/wqsMm+1xrEX8@public.gmane.org>
2004-02-07 6:29 ` Luis Miguel García
2004-02-07 6:29 ` [ACPI] " Luis Miguel García
2004-02-06 9:47 ` Daniel Drake
2004-02-06 9:47 ` [ACPI] " Daniel Drake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-05 17:41 Luis Miguel García
2004-02-05 17:41 ` Luis Miguel García
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4022B55B.1090309@wanadoo.es \
--to=ktech-39zsbgiqgt7e5aofshch1g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=a.verweij-oe7qfRrRQfeEZXFvZSAUrfP6llvjuJOh@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-LL/9OlyS9hIAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=david+challenge-response-qokYbnrgTHEgsBAKwltoeQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.