From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: add explictit DRM dependency
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:39:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4350671.DP0mBIml5S@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160104082416.GB23797@ulmo>
On Monday 04 January 2016 09:24:16 Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> Ugh... wouldn't it be much simpler to get rid of DRM_ARM? It seems like
> a completely superfluous option to me. I don't think we've ever had the
> equivalent of "vendor" Kconfig options in DRM, and I don't see why we'd
> need to start now. If ARM was going to add another driver it can simply
> have a separate Kconfig entry. There should be no need to select the
> vendor option first.
Fine with me too. I vaguely remembered having seen some discussion about
this, so I decided to do a minimal fix, but I agree that would be more
in line with the other drivers.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: add explictit DRM dependency
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:39:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4350671.DP0mBIml5S@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160104082416.GB23797@ulmo>
On Monday 04 January 2016 09:24:16 Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> Ugh... wouldn't it be much simpler to get rid of DRM_ARM? It seems like
> a completely superfluous option to me. I don't think we've ever had the
> equivalent of "vendor" Kconfig options in DRM, and I don't see why we'd
> need to start now. If ARM was going to add another driver it can simply
> have a separate Kconfig entry. There should be no need to select the
> vendor option first.
Fine with me too. I vaguely remembered having seen some discussion about
this, so I decided to do a minimal fix, but I agree that would be more
in line with the other drivers.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: add explictit DRM dependency
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:39:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4350671.DP0mBIml5S@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160104082416.GB23797@ulmo>
On Monday 04 January 2016 09:24:16 Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> Ugh... wouldn't it be much simpler to get rid of DRM_ARM? It seems like
> a completely superfluous option to me. I don't think we've ever had the
> equivalent of "vendor" Kconfig options in DRM, and I don't see why we'd
> need to start now. If ARM was going to add another driver it can simply
> have a separate Kconfig entry. There should be no need to select the
> vendor option first.
Fine with me too. I vaguely remembered having seen some discussion about
this, so I decided to do a minimal fix, but I agree that would be more
in line with the other drivers.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-04 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-01 14:09 [PATCH] drm: arm-hdlcd: remove DMA_CMA select Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: remove COMMON_CLK_SCPI select Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 14:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-04 8:26 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-04 8:26 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-04 8:26 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-01 14:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: fix build warnings for !CONFIG_PM Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 14:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 14:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-04 8:24 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-04 8:24 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-04 8:24 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-01 22:04 ` [PATCH 4/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: add explictit DRM dependency Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 22:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-04 8:24 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-04 8:24 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-04 8:24 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-04 8:39 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-01-04 8:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-04 8:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-11 11:12 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-01-11 11:12 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-01-11 12:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-11 12:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-11 12:26 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-01-11 12:26 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-01-11 12:26 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-01-11 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-11 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-11 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-11 14:14 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-01-11 14:14 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-01-11 14:14 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-01-04 8:27 ` [PATCH] drm: arm-hdlcd: remove DMA_CMA select Thierry Reding
2016-01-04 8:27 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-04 8:27 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-11 10:37 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-01-11 10:37 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-01-11 10:37 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4350671.DP0mBIml5S@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.