From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
"zhao, forrest" <forrest.zhao@intel.com>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-git1: regression: resume from suspend(RAM) fails: libata issue
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 23:35:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4477C904.7060508@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4477C60E.1070106@rtr.ca>
Mark Lord wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
>> Mark Lord wrote:
>>> My ata_piix based Notebook (Dell i9300) suspends/resumes perfectly
>>> (RAM or disk)
>>> with 2.6.16.xx kernels, but fails resume on 2.6.17-rc5-git1 (the
>>> first 2.6.17-*
>>> I've attempted on this machine).
>>>
>>> On resume from RAM, after a 30-second-ish timeout, the screen comes on
>>> but the hard disk is NOT accessible. "dmesg" in an already-open window
>>> shows this (typed in from handwritten notes):
>>>
>>> sd 0:0:0:0: SCSI error: return code = 0x40000
>>> end_request: I/O error, /dev/sda, sector nnnnnnn
>> ...
>>
>> Ahh.. the fix for this was posted earlier today by Forrest Zhao.
> ..
>> Here is a modified version of Forrest's original patch, for
>> 2.6.17-rc5-git1.
>> It seems to have fixed the resume issue on my machine here,
>> so that things are now working as they were in the unpatched 2.6.16
>> kernels.
>
>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>> This has the problem that it introduces scsi specific knowledge into
>> ata_piix, something that is both a violation and a problem because we
>> are moving libata away from scsi. I think the best way to currently do
>> this is to introduce a ata_port_ops hook (pre_resume()?) that waits for
>> busy clear and gets called in ata_device_resume is probably the way to
>> go.
>
> Well, this problem has been with us all for a year now,
> and at this point it impacts practically *every* new "centrino"
> notebook out there.
>
> We have a very simple workaround (previous post) that addresses it
> for 2.6.17, and it's about damn time it got fixed.
>
> If there's a better solution for *2.6.17*, then *please* post it.
> Otherwise, we have a fix. Maybe Linus or Andrew should just apply it?
Having been around for a year+, there is no reason to rush a really bad
fix into the kernel.
Especially since I told you guys the proper place to put basically the
exact same fix. You probably could have created the proper fix in the
time it took to get annoyed at my email, and type the reply...
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-27 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-26 9:04 [PATCH] Add ata_piix's own resume function zhao, forrest
2006-05-26 23:05 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-26 23:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-26 23:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-26 23:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 6:21 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 6:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 6:46 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 6:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 3:22 ` 2.6.17-rc5-git1: regression: resume from suspend(RAM) fails: libata issue Mark Lord
2006-05-27 3:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-27 3:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 4:00 ` [PATCH] " Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 18:23 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-27 19:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 19:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 19:01 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 20:45 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 20:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 21:11 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 21:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 21:20 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 21:23 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 21:25 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 21:30 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 21:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 21:26 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 21:31 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 21:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 21:33 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 21:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 21:37 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 21:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 21:41 ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-27 21:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-27 21:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 21:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-27 22:11 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-27 21:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-27 22:06 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 22:11 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 22:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 22:15 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 22:15 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 22:17 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 22:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-27 22:29 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 22:36 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 22:48 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 22:53 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 22:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 23:10 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-28 0:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-28 0:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-28 0:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-28 0:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-28 0:51 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-28 0:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-28 0:56 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-28 1:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-28 1:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-28 1:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-28 15:28 ` [PATCH] 2.6.17-rc5: the latest consensus libata resume fix Mark Lord
2006-05-28 17:14 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-28 19:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-28 19:18 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-28 20:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-28 20:27 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-28 22:28 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-29 1:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-29 2:53 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-29 3:18 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-29 3:28 ` zhao, forrest
2006-05-29 2:43 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 22:35 ` [PATCH] Re: 2.6.17-rc5-git1: regression: resume from suspend(RAM) fails: libata issue Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 22:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 22:54 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 23:06 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 22:56 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 23:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-27 22:23 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 22:43 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-28 0:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-27 18:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 19:08 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 19:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 19:24 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 20:24 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 6:29 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 6:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 7:01 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-27 7:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-27 18:46 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-27 3:35 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-05-27 6:20 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-26 19:25 Mark Lord
2006-05-26 19:44 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-26 23:42 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4477C904.7060508@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=forrest.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.