From: Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patchset] rewrite of initializer handling
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:46:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4676FD25.9030504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070618191653.GG21478@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:19:08AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> Hopefully this would also fix the problem reported by Michael Stefaniuc in
>> <466489FD.7010405@redhat.com>:
>>> Running sparse on
>>> int i = sizeof((const char []) {'a','a','a',0});
>>> gives
>>> zzz.c:1:9: error: cannot size expression
>
> Umm... I don't think that it's related. count_array_initializer() would
> work just fine for that one, since the straightforward list element counting
> would work as-is.
Right, it doesn't fixes this error. Actually the output of
make clean; CHECK='sparse -Wno-transparent-union -Wno-old-initializer
-Wno-non-pointer-null' make CC=cgcc > build.out 2>&1
is identical bit by bit with or without Al's patch series.
> Aha... I see what's going on - in evaluate_cast() we examine the type before
> associating it with initializer, so when we get around to evaluate_symbol()
> a bit later in the same function, it's too late - ->examined is already
> set. I wonder if moving that examine_symbol_type() downstream (and killing
> it in EXPR_INITIALIZER branch) would be enough... Looks like it should
> work, but I might be missing something here.
>
> How does something like diff below look to you, folks? It gets the
> testcase to produce expected result (and puts the right value into
> i); I'm running it on the kernel cross-builds right now, but that
> doesn't guarantee correctness, of course.
Works for Wine and removes most of the "error: cannot size expression"
errors. The 7 remaining errors are preceded by "error: bad constant
expression" in the same line. Have to condense those into a test case too.
> diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
> index c564ad9..6da8f3e 100644
> --- a/evaluate.c
> +++ b/evaluate.c
> @@ -2416,7 +2416,7 @@ out:
> static struct symbol *evaluate_cast(struct expression *expr)
> {
> struct expression *target = expr->cast_expression;
> - struct symbol *ctype = examine_symbol_type(expr->cast_type);
> + struct symbol *ctype;
> struct symbol *t1, *t2;
> int class1, class2;
> int as1, as2;
> @@ -2424,9 +2424,6 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_cast(struct expression *expr)
> if (!target)
> return NULL;
>
> - expr->ctype = ctype;
> - expr->cast_type = ctype;
> -
> /*
> * Special case: a cast can be followed by an
> * initializer, in which case we need to pass
> @@ -2441,7 +2438,7 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_cast(struct expression *expr)
> struct symbol *sym = expr->cast_type;
> struct expression *addr = alloc_expression(expr->pos, EXPR_SYMBOL);
>
> - sym->initializer = expr->cast_expression;
> + sym->initializer = target;
> evaluate_symbol(sym);
>
> addr->ctype = &lazy_ptr_ctype; /* Lazy eval */
> @@ -2455,6 +2452,10 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_cast(struct expression *expr)
> return sym;
> }
>
> + ctype = examine_symbol_type(expr->cast_type);
> + expr->ctype = ctype;
> + expr->cast_type = ctype;
> +
> evaluate_expression(target);
> degenerate(target);
>
bye
michael
--
Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199
Sr. Network Engineer Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH Email: mstefani@redhat.com
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-18 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-18 10:19 [patchset] rewrite of initializer handling Al Viro
2007-06-18 10:26 ` Al Viro
2007-06-18 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-18 18:02 ` Josh Triplett
2007-06-18 19:30 ` Al Viro
2007-06-18 18:19 ` Josh Triplett
2007-06-18 19:16 ` Al Viro
2007-06-18 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-18 21:46 ` Michael Stefaniuc [this message]
2007-06-18 22:43 ` Al Viro
2007-06-19 9:47 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2007-06-19 20:15 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2007-06-19 22:41 ` Al Viro
2007-06-20 8:54 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2007-06-20 21:29 ` Michael Stefaniuc
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-19 17:12 Alexey Dobriyan
2007-06-19 17:21 ` Al Viro
2007-06-19 22:33 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4676FD25.9030504@redhat.com \
--to=mstefani@redhat.com \
--cc=josh@freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.