All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* make xen/stable-2.6.32.x pvops branch the default?
@ 2010-06-08 11:15 Pasi Kärkkäinen
  2010-06-08 11:19 ` Michal Novotny
  2010-06-08 15:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen @ 2010-06-08 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel; +Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge, Keir Fraser

Hello,

Should we switch xen/stable-2.6.32.x to be the default branch in xen-unstable? 
And possibly in xen-4.0-testing.hg aswell? 

That's the long-term maintained and the branch most people are using anyway.. 

-- Pasi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: make xen/stable-2.6.32.x pvops branch the default?
  2010-06-08 11:15 make xen/stable-2.6.32.x pvops branch the default? Pasi Kärkkäinen
@ 2010-06-08 11:19 ` Michal Novotny
  2010-06-08 15:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Novotny @ 2010-06-08 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pasi Kärkkäinen; +Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge, xen-devel, Keir Fraser

On 06/08/2010 01:15 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Should we switch xen/stable-2.6.32.x to be the default branch in xen-unstable?
> And possibly in xen-4.0-testing.hg aswell?
>
> That's the long-term maintained and the branch most people are using anyway..
>
> -- Pasi
>    

Hi Pasi,
I'm using the default branch which is stable-2.6.31.x now but if the 
long-term maintained one would be the .32.x one I think it's better to 
have it as default since sooner or later I'll have to recompile the 
.32.x version since .31.x won't be maintained so make it a default for 
at least xen-4.1-unstable and newer versions of xen-unstable could be a 
good idea not to force other to clone/pull and recompile the another 
branch than the default one.

Thanks,
Michal
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>    


-- 
Michal Novotny<minovotn@redhat.com>, RHCE
Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: make xen/stable-2.6.32.x pvops branch the default?
  2010-06-08 11:15 make xen/stable-2.6.32.x pvops branch the default? Pasi Kärkkäinen
  2010-06-08 11:19 ` Michal Novotny
@ 2010-06-08 15:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  2010-06-08 16:15   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2010-06-08 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pasi Kärkkäinen; +Cc: xen-devel, Keir Fraser

On 06/08/2010 04:15 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Should we switch xen/stable-2.6.32.x to be the default branch in xen-unstable? 
> And possibly in xen-4.0-testing.hg aswell? 
>   

Yes, I was just thinking that.

    J

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: make xen/stable-2.6.32.x pvops branch the default?
  2010-06-08 15:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
@ 2010-06-08 16:15   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  2010-06-08 16:38     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2010-06-08 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: xen-devel, Keir Fraser

On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 08:49:19AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 06/08/2010 04:15 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Should we switch xen/stable-2.6.32.x to be the default branch in xen-unstable? 
> > And possibly in xen-4.0-testing.hg aswell? 
> >   
> 
> Yes, I was just thinking that.

On top of that, what about that udev(new version) race condition? I
think James and Bastian both provided a patch - does it make sense to
merge it in both branches (.31 and .32)?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: make xen/stable-2.6.32.x pvops branch the default?
  2010-06-08 16:15   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
@ 2010-06-08 16:38     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2010-06-08 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; +Cc: Bastian Blank, xen-devel, Jan Beulich, Keir Fraser

On 06/08/2010 09:15 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On top of that, what about that udev(new version) race condition? I
> think James and Bastian both provided a patch - does it make sense to
> merge it in both branches (.31 and .32)?
>   

I've got James' patch in .32 at the moment.  I was about to apply
Bastien's fix, but Jan raised some comments, but Bastien didn't reply. 
So I stared into space for a while.

I'd like to get a definitive fix that everyone agrees on.

Is there also a problem in .31?  Is it triggered by a new udev rather
than a kernel version?

    J

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-08 16:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-08 11:15 make xen/stable-2.6.32.x pvops branch the default? Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-06-08 11:19 ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-08 15:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-08 16:15   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-08 16:38     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.