All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: APIC: avoid instruction emulation for EOI writes
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:03:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5B7206.5070603@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5B70F8.30307@redhat.com>

On 2011-08-29 12:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 01:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>>   static int handle_apic_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>   {
>>>  +	unsigned long exit_qualification = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION);
>>>  +	int access_type, offset;
>>>  +
>>>  +	access_type = (exit_qualification>>  12)&  0xf;
>>>  +	offset = exit_qualification&  0xfff;
>>>  +	/*
>>>  +	 * Sane guest uses MOV instead of string operations to
>>>  +	 * write EOI, with written value not cared. So make a
>>>  +	 * short-circuit here by avoiding heavy instruction
>>>  +	 * emulation.
>>>  +	 */
>>
>> Is there no cheap way to validate this assumption and fall back to the
>> slow path in case it doesn't apply? E.g. reading the first instruction
>> byte and matching it against a whitelist? Even if the ignored scenarios
>> are highly unlikely, I think we so far tried hard to provide both fast
>> and accurate results to the guest in all cases.
>>
> 
> Just reading the first byte requires a guest page table walk.  This is 
> probably the highest cost in emulation (which also requires a walk for 
> the data access).

And what about caching the result of the first walk? Usually, a "sane
guest" won't have many code pages that issue the EIO.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-29 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-29  6:09 [PATCH] KVM: APIC: avoid instruction emulation for EOI writes Tian, Kevin
2011-08-29  7:23 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29  7:35   ` Tian, Kevin
2011-08-29  8:15     ` Sasha Levin
2011-08-29  8:51       ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29 10:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 10:59   ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29 11:03     ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-08-29 11:11       ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29 13:55         ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 14:14           ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-10  8:41             ` ya su
2011-09-11  7:11               ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-11  8:05                 ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E5B7206.5070603@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.