From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: APIC: avoid instruction emulation for EOI writes
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:11:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5B73CC.5080800@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5B7206.5070603@siemens.com>
On 08/29/2011 02:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> > Just reading the first byte requires a guest page table walk. This is
> > probably the highest cost in emulation (which also requires a walk for
> > the data access).
>
> And what about caching the result of the first walk? Usually, a "sane
> guest" won't have many code pages that issue the EIO.
>
There's no way to know when to invalidate the cache.
We could go a bit further, and cache the the whole thing. On the first
exit, do the entire emulation, and remember %rip. On the second exit,
if %rip matches, skip directly to kvm_lapic_eoi().
But I don't think it's worth it. This also has failure modes, and
really, no guest will ever write to EOI with stosl.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-29 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-29 6:09 [PATCH] KVM: APIC: avoid instruction emulation for EOI writes Tian, Kevin
2011-08-29 7:23 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29 7:35 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-08-29 8:15 ` Sasha Levin
2011-08-29 8:51 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29 10:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 10:59 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29 11:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 11:11 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-08-29 13:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 14:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-10 8:41 ` ya su
2011-09-11 7:11 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-11 8:05 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E5B73CC.5080800@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.