All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: APIC: avoid instruction emulation for EOI writes
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:55:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5B9A3B.2020009@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5B73CC.5080800@redhat.com>

On 2011-08-29 13:11, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 02:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>>  Just reading the first byte requires a guest page table walk.  This is
>>>  probably the highest cost in emulation (which also requires a walk for
>>>  the data access).
>>
>> And what about caching the result of the first walk? Usually, a "sane
>> guest" won't have many code pages that issue the EIO.
>>
> 
> There's no way to know when to invalidate the cache.

Set the affected code page read-only?

> 
> We could go a bit further, and cache the the whole thing.  On the first 
> exit, do the entire emulation, and remember %rip.  On the second exit, 
> if %rip matches, skip directly to kvm_lapic_eoi().
> 
> But I don't think it's worth it.  This also has failure modes, and 
> really, no guest will ever write to EOI with stosl.

...or add/sub/and/or etc. Well, we've done other crazy things in the
past just to keep even the unlikely case correct. I was just wondering
if that policy changed.

However, I just realized that user space is able to avoid this
inaccuracy for potentially insane guests by not using in-kernel
irqchips. So we have at least a knob.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-29 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-29  6:09 [PATCH] KVM: APIC: avoid instruction emulation for EOI writes Tian, Kevin
2011-08-29  7:23 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29  7:35   ` Tian, Kevin
2011-08-29  8:15     ` Sasha Levin
2011-08-29  8:51       ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29 10:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 10:59   ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29 11:03     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 11:11       ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-29 13:55         ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-08-29 14:14           ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-10  8:41             ` ya su
2011-09-11  7:11               ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-11  8:05                 ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E5B9A3B.2020009@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.