Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: flexcan: add transceiver switch gpios support

[Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1137 bytes --]

On 06/28/2012 02:08 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 07:41:10PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 01:29:19PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> I mean which name is more precise, do these gpio enable/standy a "phy"
>>> or a "transceiver". For example:
>>> http://www.nxp.com/documents/application_note/AN00094.pdf, this document
>>> says: TJA1041/1041A high speed CAN transceiver.
>>>
>> Isn't term "phy" (physical interface) generally meant to be the same
>> thing as "transceiver"?  I just happened to like the shorter one as
>> what Hui did in his patch.
> 
> 'trx' seemed the right abbreviation
> http://www.acronymfinder.com/TRX.html
> 
> thanks to Oliver, in his email on May 9th.

I was about to propose CamelCase to keep the variable names shorter:

bool transceiverStbyActiveLow;

scnr, Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]