All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* new fio release?
       [not found] <500349838.110961.1380009378087.JavaMail.zimbra@teamix.de>
@ 2013-09-24  7:59 ` Martin Steigerwald
  2013-09-24 14:41   ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martin Steigerwald @ 2013-09-24  7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fio; +Cc: Jens Axboe, Georg Schönberger

Hi Jens!

Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while I did 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago.

I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think I was almost finished with it but I had:

ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes
W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio

which as I looked are all fixed upstream already.

Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian packaging without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package from a fio release with these issues fixed.


Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release?

Thanks,
-- 
Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de
gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: new fio release?
  2013-09-24  7:59 ` new fio release? Martin Steigerwald
@ 2013-09-24 14:41   ` Jens Axboe
  2013-10-09 11:02     ` Martin Steigerwald
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2013-09-24 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Steigerwald; +Cc: fio, Georg Schönberger

On 09/24/2013 01:59 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hi Jens!
> 
> Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while I did 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago.
> 
> I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think I was almost finished with it but I had:
> 
> ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes
> W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
> W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
> W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio
> 
> which as I looked are all fixed upstream already.
> 
> Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian packaging without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package from a fio release with these issues fixed.
> 
> 
> Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release?

Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes between
2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: new fio release?
  2013-09-24 14:41   ` Jens Axboe
@ 2013-10-09 11:02     ` Martin Steigerwald
  2013-10-09 15:33       ` Jens Axboe
  2013-10-10  5:23       ` Georg Schönberger
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martin Steigerwald @ 2013-10-09 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: fio, Georg Schönberger

Hi Jens, Georg, everyone,

Am Dienstag, 24. September 2013, 08:41:51 schrieb Jens Axboe:
> On 09/24/2013 01:59 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Hi Jens!
> > 
> > Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while I did
> > 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago.
> > 
> > I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think I was
> > almost finished with it but I had:
> > 
> > ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes
> > W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
> > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
> > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio
> > 
> > which as I looked are all fixed upstream already.
> > 
> > Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian packaging
> > without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package from a
> > fio release with these issues fixed.
> > 
> > 
> > Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release?
> 
> Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes between
> 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release.

I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed and 
uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable.

I will consider a backport once this one enters testing.

Thanks,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: new fio release?
  2013-10-09 11:02     ` Martin Steigerwald
@ 2013-10-09 15:33       ` Jens Axboe
  2013-10-10  5:23       ` Georg Schönberger
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2013-10-09 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Steigerwald; +Cc: fio, Georg Schönberger

On 10/09/2013 05:02 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hi Jens, Georg, everyone,
> 
> Am Dienstag, 24. September 2013, 08:41:51 schrieb Jens Axboe:
>> On 09/24/2013 01:59 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>>> Hi Jens!
>>>
>>> Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while I did
>>> 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago.
>>>
>>> I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think I was
>>> almost finished with it but I had:
>>>
>>> ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes
>>> W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
>>> W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
>>> W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio
>>>
>>> which as I looked are all fixed upstream already.
>>>
>>> Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian packaging
>>> without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package from a
>>> fio release with these issues fixed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release?
>>
>> Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes between
>> 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release.
> 
> I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed and 
> uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable.
> 
> I will consider a backport once this one enters testing.

Just a headsup that 2.1.4 will be coming in the not-so-distant future.
2.1.2/3 is broken on Windows, would like to get that fixed up and cut a
new release.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: new fio release?
  2013-10-09 11:02     ` Martin Steigerwald
  2013-10-09 15:33       ` Jens Axboe
@ 2013-10-10  5:23       ` Georg Schönberger
  2013-10-10 12:52         ` Martin Steigerwald
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Georg Schönberger @ 2013-10-10  5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Steigerwald; +Cc: fio, Jens Axboe

Hi Martin and Fio Users,

> > > Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while
> > > I did
> > > 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago.
> > > 
> > > I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think
> > > I was
> > > almost finished with it but I had:
> > > 
> > > ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE
> > > fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes
> > > W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
> > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
> > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio
> > > 
> > > which as I looked are all fixed upstream already.
> > > 
> > > Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian
> > > packaging
> > > without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package
> > > from a
> > > fio release with these issues fixed.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release?
> > 
> > Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes
> > between
> > 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release.
> 
> I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed
> and
> uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable.
> 
> I will consider a backport once this one enters testing.
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
> GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
> 

Do I have to consider special conditions if I rebuild Fio 2.1.3 and later on 2.1.4 under Ubuntu Precise?

Thanks, Georg


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: new fio release?
  2013-10-10  5:23       ` Georg Schönberger
@ 2013-10-10 12:52         ` Martin Steigerwald
  2013-10-10 12:56           ` Martin Steigerwald
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martin Steigerwald @ 2013-10-10 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Georg Schönberger; +Cc: fio, Jens Axboe

Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2013, 07:23:42 schrieb Georg Schönberger:
> Hi Martin and Fio Users,

Hi Georg!

> > > > Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while
> > > > I did
> > > > 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago.
> > > > 
> > > > I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think
> > > > I was
> > > > almost finished with it but I had:
> > > > 
> > > > ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE
> > > > fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes
> > > > W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
> > > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
> > > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio
> > > > 
> > > > which as I looked are all fixed upstream already.
> > > > 
> > > > Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian
> > > > packaging
> > > > without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package
> > > > from a
> > > > fio release with these issues fixed.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release?
> > > 
> > > Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes
> > > between
> > > 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release.
> > 
> > I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed
> > and
> > uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable.
> > 
> > I will consider a backport once this one enters testing.
> > 
> > Thanks,
[…]
> Do I have to consider special conditions if I rebuild Fio 2.1.3 and later on
> 2.1.4 under Ubuntu Precise?

I don´t know. I never built a package for Ubuntu.

I suggest to just try it out :)

Ciao,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: new fio release?
  2013-10-10 12:52         ` Martin Steigerwald
@ 2013-10-10 12:56           ` Martin Steigerwald
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martin Steigerwald @ 2013-10-10 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Georg Schönberger; +Cc: fio, Jens Axboe

Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2013, 14:52:39 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2013, 07:23:42 schrieb Georg Schönberger:
> > Hi Martin and Fio Users,
> 
> Hi Georg!
[…]
> > > I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed
> > > and
> > > uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable.
> > > 
> > > I will consider a backport once this one enters testing.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> 
> […]
> 
> > Do I have to consider special conditions if I rebuild Fio 2.1.3 and later
> > on 2.1.4 under Ubuntu Precise?
> 
> I don´t know. I never built a package for Ubuntu.
> 
> I suggest to just try it out :)

Of course you can always check whether Ubuntu Precise can satisfy the 
dependencies of the package first.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-10 12:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <500349838.110961.1380009378087.JavaMail.zimbra@teamix.de>
2013-09-24  7:59 ` new fio release? Martin Steigerwald
2013-09-24 14:41   ` Jens Axboe
2013-10-09 11:02     ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-10-09 15:33       ` Jens Axboe
2013-10-10  5:23       ` Georg Schönberger
2013-10-10 12:52         ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-10-10 12:56           ` Martin Steigerwald

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.