* new fio release? [not found] <500349838.110961.1380009378087.JavaMail.zimbra@teamix.de> @ 2013-09-24 7:59 ` Martin Steigerwald 2013-09-24 14:41 ` Jens Axboe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Steigerwald @ 2013-09-24 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: fio; +Cc: Jens Axboe, Georg Schönberger Hi Jens! Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while I did 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago. I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think I was almost finished with it but I had: ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio which as I looked are all fixed upstream already. Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian packaging without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package from a fio release with these issues fixed. Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release? Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: new fio release? 2013-09-24 7:59 ` new fio release? Martin Steigerwald @ 2013-09-24 14:41 ` Jens Axboe 2013-10-09 11:02 ` Martin Steigerwald 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2013-09-24 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin Steigerwald; +Cc: fio, Georg Schönberger On 09/24/2013 01:59 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi Jens! > > Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while I did 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago. > > I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think I was almost finished with it but I had: > > ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes > W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio > > which as I looked are all fixed upstream already. > > Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian packaging without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package from a fio release with these issues fixed. > > > Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release? Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes between 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release. -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: new fio release? 2013-09-24 14:41 ` Jens Axboe @ 2013-10-09 11:02 ` Martin Steigerwald 2013-10-09 15:33 ` Jens Axboe 2013-10-10 5:23 ` Georg Schönberger 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Steigerwald @ 2013-10-09 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: fio, Georg Schönberger Hi Jens, Georg, everyone, Am Dienstag, 24. September 2013, 08:41:51 schrieb Jens Axboe: > On 09/24/2013 01:59 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Hi Jens! > > > > Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while I did > > 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago. > > > > I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think I was > > almost finished with it but I had: > > > > ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes > > W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio > > > > which as I looked are all fixed upstream already. > > > > Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian packaging > > without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package from a > > fio release with these issues fixed. > > > > > > Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release? > > Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes between > 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release. I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed and uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable. I will consider a backport once this one enters testing. Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: new fio release? 2013-10-09 11:02 ` Martin Steigerwald @ 2013-10-09 15:33 ` Jens Axboe 2013-10-10 5:23 ` Georg Schönberger 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2013-10-09 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin Steigerwald; +Cc: fio, Georg Schönberger On 10/09/2013 05:02 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi Jens, Georg, everyone, > > Am Dienstag, 24. September 2013, 08:41:51 schrieb Jens Axboe: >> On 09/24/2013 01:59 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: >>> Hi Jens! >>> >>> Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while I did >>> 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago. >>> >>> I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think I was >>> almost finished with it but I had: >>> >>> ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes >>> W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py >>> W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py >>> W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio >>> >>> which as I looked are all fixed upstream already. >>> >>> Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian packaging >>> without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package from a >>> fio release with these issues fixed. >>> >>> >>> Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release? >> >> Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes between >> 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release. > > I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed and > uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable. > > I will consider a backport once this one enters testing. Just a headsup that 2.1.4 will be coming in the not-so-distant future. 2.1.2/3 is broken on Windows, would like to get that fixed up and cut a new release. -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: new fio release? 2013-10-09 11:02 ` Martin Steigerwald 2013-10-09 15:33 ` Jens Axboe @ 2013-10-10 5:23 ` Georg Schönberger 2013-10-10 12:52 ` Martin Steigerwald 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Georg Schönberger @ 2013-10-10 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin Steigerwald; +Cc: fio, Jens Axboe Hi Martin and Fio Users, > > > Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while > > > I did > > > 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago. > > > > > > I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think > > > I was > > > almost finished with it but I had: > > > > > > ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE > > > fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes > > > W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio > > > > > > which as I looked are all fixed upstream already. > > > > > > Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian > > > packaging > > > without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package > > > from a > > > fio release with these issues fixed. > > > > > > > > > Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release? > > > > Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes > > between > > 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release. > > I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed > and > uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable. > > I will consider a backport once this one enters testing. > > Thanks, > -- > Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de > GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 > Do I have to consider special conditions if I rebuild Fio 2.1.3 and later on 2.1.4 under Ubuntu Precise? Thanks, Georg ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: new fio release? 2013-10-10 5:23 ` Georg Schönberger @ 2013-10-10 12:52 ` Martin Steigerwald 2013-10-10 12:56 ` Martin Steigerwald 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Steigerwald @ 2013-10-10 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Georg Schönberger; +Cc: fio, Jens Axboe Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2013, 07:23:42 schrieb Georg Schönberger: > Hi Martin and Fio Users, Hi Georg! > > > > Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while > > > > I did > > > > 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago. > > > > > > > > I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think > > > > I was > > > > almost finished with it but I had: > > > > > > > > ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE > > > > fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes > > > > W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > > > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py > > > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio > > > > > > > > which as I looked are all fixed upstream already. > > > > > > > > Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian > > > > packaging > > > > without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package > > > > from a > > > > fio release with these issues fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release? > > > > > > Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes > > > between > > > 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release. > > > > I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed > > and > > uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable. > > > > I will consider a backport once this one enters testing. > > > > Thanks, […] > Do I have to consider special conditions if I rebuild Fio 2.1.3 and later on > 2.1.4 under Ubuntu Precise? I don´t know. I never built a package for Ubuntu. I suggest to just try it out :) Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: new fio release? 2013-10-10 12:52 ` Martin Steigerwald @ 2013-10-10 12:56 ` Martin Steigerwald 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Steigerwald @ 2013-10-10 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Georg Schönberger; +Cc: fio, Jens Axboe Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2013, 14:52:39 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2013, 07:23:42 schrieb Georg Schönberger: > > Hi Martin and Fio Users, > > Hi Georg! […] > > > I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed > > > and > > > uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable. > > > > > > I will consider a backport once this one enters testing. > > > > > > Thanks, > > […] > > > Do I have to consider special conditions if I rebuild Fio 2.1.3 and later > > on 2.1.4 under Ubuntu Precise? > > I don´t know. I never built a package for Ubuntu. > > I suggest to just try it out :) Of course you can always check whether Ubuntu Precise can satisfy the dependencies of the package first. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-10 12:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <500349838.110961.1380009378087.JavaMail.zimbra@teamix.de>
2013-09-24 7:59 ` new fio release? Martin Steigerwald
2013-09-24 14:41 ` Jens Axboe
2013-10-09 11:02 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-10-09 15:33 ` Jens Axboe
2013-10-10 5:23 ` Georg Schönberger
2013-10-10 12:52 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-10-10 12:56 ` Martin Steigerwald
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.