From: Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sudeep.Holla@arm.com,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] ARM: kernel: add support for cpu cache information
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 19:35:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CEF9E7.4070706@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140108205754.GN27432@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 08/01/14 20:57, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 07:26:07PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 7 /* pre ARMv7 */
>> +
>> +#define MAX_CACHE_LEVEL=09=091=09/* Only 1 level supported */
>> +#define CTR_CTYPE_SHIFT=09=0924
>> +#define CTR_CTYPE_MASK=09=09(1 << CTR_CTYPE_SHIFT)
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned int get_ctr(void)
>> +{
>> +=09unsigned int ctr;
>> +=09asm volatile ("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c0, 1" : "=3Dr" (ctr));
>> +=09return ctr;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static enum cache_type get_cache_type(int level)
>> +{
>> +=09if (level > MAX_CACHE_LEVEL)
>> +=09=09return CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE;
>> +=09return get_ctr() & CTR_CTYPE_MASK ?
>> +=09=09CACHE_TYPE_SEPARATE : CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
>=20
> So, what do we do for CPUs that don't implement the CTR? Just return
> random rubbish based on decoding the CPU Identity register as if it
> were the cache type register?
>=20
I assume you referring to some particular CPUs which don't implement this.
I could not find it as optional or IMPLEMENTATION defined in ARM ARM.
I might be missing to find it or there may be exceptions.
Can you please provide more information on that ?
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep.Holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/3] ARM: kernel: add support for cpu cache information
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 19:35:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CEF9E7.4070706@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140108205754.GN27432@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 08/01/14 20:57, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 07:26:07PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 7 /* pre ARMv7 */
>> +
>> +#define MAX_CACHE_LEVEL 1 /* Only 1 level supported */
>> +#define CTR_CTYPE_SHIFT 24
>> +#define CTR_CTYPE_MASK (1 << CTR_CTYPE_SHIFT)
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned int get_ctr(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int ctr;
>> + asm volatile ("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c0, 1" : "=r" (ctr));
>> + return ctr;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static enum cache_type get_cache_type(int level)
>> +{
>> + if (level > MAX_CACHE_LEVEL)
>> + return CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE;
>> + return get_ctr() & CTR_CTYPE_MASK ?
>> + CACHE_TYPE_SEPARATE : CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
>
> So, what do we do for CPUs that don't implement the CTR? Just return
> random rubbish based on decoding the CPU Identity register as if it
> were the cache type register?
>
I assume you referring to some particular CPUs which don't implement this.
I could not find it as optional or IMPLEMENTATION defined in ARM ARM.
I might be missing to find it or there may be exceptions.
Can you please provide more information on that ?
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Sudeep.Holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
"x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
<linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] ARM: kernel: add support for cpu cache information
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 19:35:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CEF9E7.4070706@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140108205754.GN27432-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
On 08/01/14 20:57, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 07:26:07PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 7 /* pre ARMv7 */
>> +
>> +#define MAX_CACHE_LEVEL 1 /* Only 1 level supported */
>> +#define CTR_CTYPE_SHIFT 24
>> +#define CTR_CTYPE_MASK (1 << CTR_CTYPE_SHIFT)
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned int get_ctr(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int ctr;
>> + asm volatile ("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c0, 1" : "=r" (ctr));
>> + return ctr;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static enum cache_type get_cache_type(int level)
>> +{
>> + if (level > MAX_CACHE_LEVEL)
>> + return CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE;
>> + return get_ctr() & CTR_CTYPE_MASK ?
>> + CACHE_TYPE_SEPARATE : CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
>
> So, what do we do for CPUs that don't implement the CTR? Just return
> random rubbish based on decoding the CPU Identity register as if it
> were the cache type register?
>
I assume you referring to some particular CPUs which don't implement this.
I could not find it as optional or IMPLEMENTATION defined in ARM ARM.
I might be missing to find it or there may be exceptions.
Can you please provide more information on that ?
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Sudeep.Holla@arm.com, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] ARM: kernel: add support for cpu cache information
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 19:35:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CEF9E7.4070706@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140108205754.GN27432@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 08/01/14 20:57, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 07:26:07PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 7 /* pre ARMv7 */
>> +
>> +#define MAX_CACHE_LEVEL 1 /* Only 1 level supported */
>> +#define CTR_CTYPE_SHIFT 24
>> +#define CTR_CTYPE_MASK (1 << CTR_CTYPE_SHIFT)
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned int get_ctr(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int ctr;
>> + asm volatile ("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c0, 1" : "=r" (ctr));
>> + return ctr;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static enum cache_type get_cache_type(int level)
>> +{
>> + if (level > MAX_CACHE_LEVEL)
>> + return CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE;
>> + return get_ctr() & CTR_CTYPE_MASK ?
>> + CACHE_TYPE_SEPARATE : CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
>
> So, what do we do for CPUs that don't implement the CTR? Just return
> random rubbish based on decoding the CPU Identity register as if it
> were the cache type register?
>
I assume you referring to some particular CPUs which don't implement this.
I could not find it as optional or IMPLEMENTATION defined in ARM ARM.
I might be missing to find it or there may be exceptions.
Can you please provide more information on that ?
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-09 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-08 19:26 [PATCH RFC 0/3] drivers: cacheinfo support Sudeep Holla
2014-01-08 19:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-08 19:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-08 19:26 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] drivers: base: support cpu cache information interface to userspace via sysfs Sudeep Holla
2014-01-08 19:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-08 20:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-08 20:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-08 20:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-08 20:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-09 19:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-08 20:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-08 20:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-08 20:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-09 19:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-09 19:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-09 19:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-09 19:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-09 19:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 20:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-09 20:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-09 20:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-09 20:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-08 20:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-08 20:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-08 20:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-08 20:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-09 19:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-08 19:26 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] ARM: kernel: add support for cpu cache information Sudeep Holla
2014-01-08 19:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-08 19:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-08 20:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-08 20:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-08 20:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-08 20:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-09 19:35 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-01-09 19:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 19:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-09 20:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-09 20:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-09 20:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-08 19:26 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] ARM: kernel: add outer cache support for cacheinfo implementation Sudeep Holla
2014-01-08 19:26 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CEF9E7.4070706@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.