RBD tests on the next dumpling release

RBD tests on the next dumpling release

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 621 bytes --]

Hi Jason & Josh,

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10773 is the last unresolved issue for the next dumpling point release. I tried to collect information about the problem but I'm not sure if it should be a blocker or not. I suspect it's not but ... what do you think ?

For the record, the commits that are included in the backport branch being tested are summarized here : http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/dumpling up to and including http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/dumpling#pull-requests-waiting-to-be-integrated

Cheers
-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release

[Jason Dillaman]

I'll take a look at it today, but my gut tells me it probably has something to do w/ a new version of QEMU (assuming the binary isn't source controlled).  On a semi-related note, I just discovered that http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 is missing a dumpling backport request.  I'll get a dumpling pull request for that issue ASAP.

-- 

Jason Dillaman 
Red Hat 
dillaman@redhat.com 
http://www.redhat.com 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
To: "Jason Dillaman" <dillaman@redhat.com>, "Josh Durgin" <jdurgin@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 5:30:14 PM
Subject: RBD tests on the next dumpling release

Hi Jason & Josh,

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10773 is the last unresolved issue for the next dumpling point release. I tried to collect information about the problem but I'm not sure if it should be a blocker or not. I suspect it's not but ... what do you think ?

For the record, the commits that are included in the backport branch being tested are summarized here : http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/dumpling up to and including http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/dumpling#pull-requests-waiting-to-be-integrated

Cheers
-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 965 bytes --]

Hi Jason,

Thanks for taking time to check :-) 

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 is indeed in the list of issues that need backporting for dumpling:

http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/dumpling#issues-that-need-backporting

so is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10299. I'm happy to do another round of testing if you think these two need to be in the next release. Otherwise they will be in the next point release. I'm hopeful we'll be able to do more frequent point releases in the future.

On 06/02/2015 15:05, Jason Dillaman wrote:> I'll take a look at it today, but my gut tells me it probably has something to do w/ a new version of QEMU (assuming the binary isn't source controlled).  On a semi-related note, I just discovered that http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 is missing a dumpling backport request.  I'll get a dumpling pull request for that issue ASAP.
> 

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release

[Jason Dillaman]

I would say #9854 is critical for this dumpling point release since it fixes a regression that would otherwise be introduced by this point release.

-- 

Jason Dillaman 
Red Hat 
dillaman@redhat.com 
http://www.redhat.com 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
To: "Jason Dillaman" <dillaman@redhat.com>
Cc: "Josh Durgin" <jdurgin@redhat.com>, "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 9:17:39 AM
Subject: Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release

Hi Jason,

Thanks for taking time to check :-) 

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 is indeed in the list of issues that need backporting for dumpling:

http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/dumpling#issues-that-need-backporting

so is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10299. I'm happy to do another round of testing if you think these two need to be in the next release. Otherwise they will be in the next point release. I'm hopeful we'll be able to do more frequent point releases in the future.

On 06/02/2015 15:05, Jason Dillaman wrote:> I'll take a look at it today, but my gut tells me it probably has something to do w/ a new version of QEMU (assuming the binary isn't source controlled).  On a semi-related note, I just discovered that http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 is missing a dumpling backport request.  I'll get a dumpling pull request for that issue ASAP.
> 

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1175 bytes --]

Hi Jason,

Your backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3655 was added to the dumpling-backports branch and the RBD suite run came back with one error.

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-february

I'm under the impression that this is unrelated. What do you think ?

The error found in the previous run

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-fd37e5a9749c5579a592ebe926a3c576be0617cd-3-february

could not be repeated by another run of the same test

http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-05_21:41:04-rbd-dumpling-backports---basic-multi/

and I closed the ticket as "Can't reproduce" since you did not reproduce it locally either. Feel free to change the state of the ticket if, for instance, you would like it to remain open during a few weeks in case it shows up again.

Cheers

On 06/02/2015 15:42, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> I would say #9854 is critical for this dumpling point release since it fixes a regression that would otherwise be introduced by this point release.
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release

[Jason Dillaman]

I would agree with your assessment that http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-february sounds like a repeat of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4959.

Josh, thoughts?

-- 

Jason Dillaman 
Red Hat 
dillaman@redhat.com 
http://www.redhat.com 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
To: "Jason Dillaman" <dillaman@redhat.com>
Cc: "Josh Durgin" <jdurgin@redhat.com>, "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, February 9, 2015 5:12:58 AM
Subject: Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release

Hi Jason,

Your backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3655 was added to the dumpling-backports branch and the RBD suite run came back with one error.

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-february

I'm under the impression that this is unrelated. What do you think ?

The error found in the previous run

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-fd37e5a9749c5579a592ebe926a3c576be0617cd-3-february

could not be repeated by another run of the same test

http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-05_21:41:04-rbd-dumpling-backports---basic-multi/

and I closed the ticket as "Can't reproduce" since you did not reproduce it locally either. Feel free to change the state of the ticket if, for instance, you would like it to remain open during a few weeks in case it shows up again.

Cheers

On 06/02/2015 15:42, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> I would say #9854 is critical for this dumpling point release since it fixes a regression that would otherwise be introduced by this point release.
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release

[Josh Durgin]

On 02/09/2015 12:27 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> I would agree with your assessment that http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-february sounds like a repeat of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4959.
>
> Josh, thoughts?
>

Yeah, that looks the same. I think we can ignore it.

Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 685 bytes --]

Thanks for the confirmation :-)

On 10/02/2015 01:08, Josh Durgin wrote:
> On 02/09/2015 12:27 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>> I would agree with your assessment that http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-february sounds like a repeat of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4959.
>>
>> Josh, thoughts?
>>
> 
> Yeah, that looks the same. I think we can ignore it.
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]