rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.7

rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.7

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Yehuda,

The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed most the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14692#note-46). 

One failure is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15316 when seems related to how ansible installs Amazon::S3
The other is a valgrind issue which seems new http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-04-06_01:32:41-rgw-hammer-backports---basic-smithi/110829/

There are runs of the rgw hammer branch on http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.ceph.com:8081/?branch=hammer&suite=rgw as well but they are tainted by http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13885 which will hopefully be fixed by https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests/pull/104 for the next round of jewel/hammer backports.

Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.7

[Loic Dachary]

Ping ?

On 11/04/2016 13:43, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Yehuda,
> 
> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed most the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14692#note-46). 
> 
> One failure is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15316 when seems related to how ansible installs Amazon::S3
> The other is a valgrind issue which seems new http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-04-06_01:32:41-rgw-hammer-backports---basic-smithi/110829/
> 
> There are runs of the rgw hammer branch on http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.ceph.com:8081/?branch=hammer&suite=rgw as well but they are tainted by http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13885 which will hopefully be fixed by https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests/pull/104 for the next round of jewel/hammer backports.
> 
> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
> 
> Cheers
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.7

[Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub]

Hi Loic,

sorry for the late response, was out for a couple of weeks, and
managed to miss this message. Yes, it looks fine. The valgrind issue
does not look like rgw related.

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Ping ?
>
> On 11/04/2016 13:43, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Yehuda,
>>
>> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed most the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14692#note-46).
>>
>> One failure is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15316 when seems related to how ansible installs Amazon::S3
>> The other is a valgrind issue which seems new http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-04-06_01:32:41-rgw-hammer-backports---basic-smithi/110829/
>>
>> There are runs of the rgw hammer branch on http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.ceph.com:8081/?branch=hammer&suite=rgw as well but they are tainted by http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13885 which will hopefully be fixed by https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests/pull/104 for the next round of jewel/hammer backports.
>>
>> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html