From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>, cocci@inria.fr
Cc: Erick Karanja <karanja99erick@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cocci] Searching for lock calls without unlocking (with SmPL)?
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 07:24:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74b74c33-22d9-4282-bb2c-1c475d715e5d@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2508022111230.3428@hadrien>
> You do know that
>
> @@
> expression x;
> @@
>
> - a(x);
>
> would remove all three calls. right?
We tend to adjust all affected source code places.
> Why do you expect * to do something different?
One of the recurring source code analysis tasks can be to point the beginning
of a sequence out.
Thus there are corresponding case distinctions relevant.
* Presenting only the first hit
* Reconsidering subsequent repetitions
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-03 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-23 7:45 [cocci] Searching for questionable call pairs (with SmPL)? Markus Elfring
2025-07-24 14:15 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-24 14:47 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-24 15:02 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-24 15:09 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-24 15:15 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-24 15:25 ` Julia Lawall
2025-07-24 15:30 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-24 16:18 ` Markus Elfring
2025-07-30 12:10 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-01 7:33 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-01 8:06 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-01 8:33 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 10:13 ` [cocci] Searching for lock calls without unlocking " Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 11:18 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 11:28 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 11:51 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 11:54 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 12:02 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 12:10 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 12:56 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 13:05 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 13:33 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 13:45 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 14:06 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 15:43 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 15:46 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 16:01 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 16:04 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 16:18 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 16:24 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 16:35 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 17:38 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 18:11 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 19:12 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 19:26 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 19:35 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 19:42 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-02 19:44 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-02 19:48 ` [cocci] Evolution of software documentation? Markus Elfring
2025-08-03 5:24 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2025-08-03 5:34 ` [cocci] Searching for lock calls without unlocking (with SmPL)? Julia Lawall
2025-08-03 5:55 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-03 7:55 ` Markus Elfring
2025-08-04 10:55 ` [cocci] Searching for questionable call pairs " Markus Elfring
2025-08-04 11:25 ` [cocci] Searching for lock calls without unlocking " Markus Elfring
2025-08-06 9:30 ` [cocci] Searching for repeated actions " Markus Elfring
2025-07-24 18:37 ` [cocci] Searching for questionable call pairs " Markus Elfring
2025-07-25 7:06 ` Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74b74c33-22d9-4282-bb2c-1c475d715e5d@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=karanja99erick@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.