From: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: net: phy: Dealing with 88e1543 dual-port mode
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 01:11:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eekoanvj.fsf@waldekranz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119231613.GN1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 23:16, Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:43:39PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 16:24, Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> wrote:
>> > I don't think we have a way to distinguish from the DT if we are in
>> > SGMII-to-Fibre or in SGMII-to-{Copper + Fibre}, since the description is
>> > the same, we don't have any information in DT about wether or not the
>> > PHY is wired to a Copper RJ45 port.
>> >
>> > Maybe we should have a way to indicate if a PHY is wired to a Copper
>> > port in DT ?
>>
>> Do you mean something like:
>>
>> SGMII->SGMII (Fibre):
>> ethernet-phy@0 {
>> sfp = <&sfp0>;
>> };
>>
>> SGMII->MDI (Copper):
>> ethernet-phy@0 {
>> mdi;
>> };
>>
>> SGMII->Auto Media Detect
>> ethernet-phy@0 {
>> mdi;
>> sfp = <&sfp0>;
>> };
>
> This isn't something we could realistically do - think about how many
> DT files are out there today which would not have this for an existing
> PHY. The default has to be that today's DT descriptions continue to work
> as-is, and that includes ones which already support copper and fibre
> either with or without a sfp property.
>
> So, we can't draw any conclusion about whether the fiber interface is
> wired from whether there is a sfp property or not.
>
> We also can't draw a conclusion about whether the copper side is wired
> using a "mdi" property, or whether there is a "sfp" property or not.
>
> The only thing we could realistically do today is to introduce a
> property like:
>
> mdi = "disabled" | "okay";
>
> to indicate whether the copper port can be used, and maybe something
> similar for the fiber interface. Maybe as you suggest, not "okay"
> but specifying the number of connected pairs would be a good idea,
> or maybe that should be a separate property?
Maybe you could have optional media nodes under the PHY instead, so that
you don't involve the SFP property in the logic (SGMII can be connected
to lots of things after all):
ethernet-phy@0 {
...
sgmii {
status = "okay";
preferred;
};
mdi {
status = "okay";
pairs = <2>;
};
};
In the absence of any media declarations, you fall back to the driver's
default behavior (keeping compatibility with older DTs). But you can
still add support for more configurations if the information is
available.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: net: phy: Dealing with 88e1543 dual-port mode
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 01:11:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eekoanvj.fsf@waldekranz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119231613.GN1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 23:16, Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:43:39PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 16:24, Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> wrote:
>> > I don't think we have a way to distinguish from the DT if we are in
>> > SGMII-to-Fibre or in SGMII-to-{Copper + Fibre}, since the description is
>> > the same, we don't have any information in DT about wether or not the
>> > PHY is wired to a Copper RJ45 port.
>> >
>> > Maybe we should have a way to indicate if a PHY is wired to a Copper
>> > port in DT ?
>>
>> Do you mean something like:
>>
>> SGMII->SGMII (Fibre):
>> ethernet-phy@0 {
>> sfp = <&sfp0>;
>> };
>>
>> SGMII->MDI (Copper):
>> ethernet-phy@0 {
>> mdi;
>> };
>>
>> SGMII->Auto Media Detect
>> ethernet-phy@0 {
>> mdi;
>> sfp = <&sfp0>;
>> };
>
> This isn't something we could realistically do - think about how many
> DT files are out there today which would not have this for an existing
> PHY. The default has to be that today's DT descriptions continue to work
> as-is, and that includes ones which already support copper and fibre
> either with or without a sfp property.
>
> So, we can't draw any conclusion about whether the fiber interface is
> wired from whether there is a sfp property or not.
>
> We also can't draw a conclusion about whether the copper side is wired
> using a "mdi" property, or whether there is a "sfp" property or not.
>
> The only thing we could realistically do today is to introduce a
> property like:
>
> mdi = "disabled" | "okay";
>
> to indicate whether the copper port can be used, and maybe something
> similar for the fiber interface. Maybe as you suggest, not "okay"
> but specifying the number of connected pairs would be a good idea,
> or maybe that should be a separate property?
Maybe you could have optional media nodes under the PHY instead, so that
you don't involve the SFP property in the logic (SGMII can be connected
to lots of things after all):
ethernet-phy@0 {
...
sgmii {
status = "okay";
preferred;
};
mdi {
status = "okay";
pairs = <2>;
};
};
In the absence of any media declarations, you fall back to the driver's
default behavior (keeping compatibility with older DTs). But you can
still add support for more configurations if the information is
available.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-19 14:22 net: phy: Dealing with 88e1543 dual-port mode Maxime Chevallier
2020-11-19 14:22 ` Maxime Chevallier
2020-11-19 14:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-19 14:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-19 15:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-19 15:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-19 15:24 ` Maxime Chevallier
2020-11-19 15:24 ` Maxime Chevallier
2020-11-19 22:43 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-11-19 22:43 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-11-19 23:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-19 23:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-20 0:11 ` Tobias Waldekranz [this message]
2020-11-20 0:11 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-11-20 0:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-20 0:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-20 9:12 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-11-20 9:12 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-11-20 9:36 ` Maxime Chevallier
2020-11-20 9:36 ` Maxime Chevallier
2020-11-20 10:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-20 10:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-20 10:59 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-11-20 10:59 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-11-20 13:55 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-11-20 13:55 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-11-20 14:18 ` Maxime Chevallier
2020-11-20 14:18 ` Maxime Chevallier
2020-11-20 0:00 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-11-20 0:00 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-11-20 9:05 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-11-20 9:05 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-11-19 15:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-11-19 15:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-11-19 15:45 ` Maxime Chevallier
2020-11-19 15:45 ` Maxime Chevallier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eekoanvj.fsf@waldekranz.com \
--to=tobias@waldekranz.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.