From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Alistair Francis" <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
"BALATON Zoltan" <balaton@eik.bme.hu>,
"Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <bonzini@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs/devel: relax policy on AI-generated contributions
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:28:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0gdhe8v.fsf@draig.linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajGLcOrCjJFW3Biw@redhat.com> ("Daniel P. Berrangé"'s message of "Tue, 16 Jun 2026 18:44:16 +0100")
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Am 29.05.26 um 11:46 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> > -Exceptions do not remove the need for authors to comply with all other
>> > -requirements for contribution. In particular, the "Signed-off-by"
>> > -label in a patch submission is a statement that the author takes
>> > -responsibility for the entire contents of the patch, including any parts
>> > -that were generated or assisted by AI tools or other tools.
>> > +.. code-block:: none
>> > +
>> > + AI-used-for: tests, docs
>> > + AI-used-for: code
>> > + AI-used-for: code (refactoring)
>> > + AI-used-for: code (prototype)
>> > + AI-used-for: research
>> > +
>> > +``AI-used-for`` should not be included for "background" usage such as
>> > +autocomplete or obtaining a pre-review of the patch.
>>
>> So what about using AI for security scanning? So how do we want to treat
>> a patch from a human that is based on an AI report.
>> And if ok, would we then add something like
>>
>> Reported-by: Claude, chatgpt whatever?
>
> I see no need to provide advertizing for these tools.
>
> Our security disclosure rules require that the submitter acknowledge
> they have reviewed any LLM output themselves before reporting. So
> from that POV it is the human who gave us the report and whom
> deserves the credit, not any tool or vendor.
>
> FWIW, although pretty much every security report recently smells
> strongly of LLM (highly structured markdown with headings that
> look the same from all reporters), almost none of them credit the
> specific tool used anyway.
We have created a new label Audit Tooling: AI in the issues but the most
interesting thing about that is to see how AI does compared to existing
fuzzing and static analysis techniques. The underlying model isn't super
interesting here.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel
--
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-29 9:46 [PATCH v2] docs/devel: relax policy on AI-generated contributions Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-29 11:52 ` Alex Bennée
2026-05-29 13:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-29 13:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-29 11:59 ` BALATON Zoltan
2026-05-29 15:34 ` Peter Maydell
2026-05-29 15:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-29 15:55 ` Peter Maydell
2026-05-29 16:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-29 17:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-02 7:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-02 8:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-06-02 15:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-06-03 11:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-06-03 14:55 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-06-03 14:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2026-06-03 15:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-03 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-06-03 17:54 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2026-06-04 10:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-06-05 9:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2026-06-05 9:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-05 9:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2026-06-05 9:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-05 10:23 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2026-06-05 10:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-05 10:34 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2026-06-05 11:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-06-05 12:39 ` BALATON Zoltan
2026-06-05 13:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2026-06-03 18:14 ` Alex Bennée
2026-06-03 18:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2026-06-04 10:04 ` Alex Bennée
2026-06-04 6:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-05 10:12 ` Kevin Wolf
2026-06-05 10:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-16 17:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-06-16 17:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-16 17:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2026-06-17 6:28 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2026-06-17 8:38 ` Kevin Wolf
2026-06-17 8:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y0gdhe8v.fsf@draig.linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=balaton@eik.bme.hu \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=imp@bsdimp.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.