Re: [PATCH v4 03/13] irqchip/riscv-intc: Introduce Andes hart-level interrupt controller

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Wed, Nov 22 2023 at 20:12, Yu Chien Peter Lin wrote:
> To share the riscv_intc_domain_map() with the generic RISC-V INTC and
> ACPI, we add a chip parameter to riscv_intc_init_common(), so it can be

s/we//

See: Documentation/process/

> passed to the irq_domain_set_info() as private data.
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
> index 2fdd40f2a791..30f0036c8978 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/soc/andes/irq.h>
>  
>  static struct irq_domain *intc_domain;
>  
> @@ -46,6 +47,31 @@ static void riscv_intc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
>  	csr_set(CSR_IE, BIT(d->hwirq));
>  }
>  
> +static void andes_intc_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Andes specific S-mode local interrupt causes (hwirq)
> +	 * are defined as (256 + n) and controlled by n-th bit
> +	 * of SLIE.
> +	 */
> +	unsigned int mask = BIT(d->hwirq % BITS_PER_LONG);

How is this supposed to be correct with BITS_PER_LONG == 64?

> +
> +	if (d->hwirq < ANDES_SLI_CAUSE_BASE)
> +		csr_clear(CSR_IE, mask);
> +	else
> +		csr_clear(ANDES_CSR_SLIE, mask);
> +}
> +
> +static void andes_intc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	unsigned int mask = BIT(d->hwirq % BITS_PER_LONG);

Ditto.

> +	if (d->hwirq < ANDES_SLI_CAUSE_BASE)
> +		csr_set(CSR_IE, mask);
> +	else
> +		csr_set(ANDES_CSR_SLIE, mask);
> +}

>  static int riscv_intc_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
>  				 irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
>  {
> +	struct irq_chip *chip = d->host_data;
> +
>  	irq_set_percpu_devid(irq);
> -	irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hwirq, &riscv_intc_chip, d->host_data,
> +	irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hwirq, chip, d->host_data,

So this sets 'chip_data' to the chip itself. What's the point? Just set
it to NULL as the chip obviously does not need chip_data at all.

>  			    handle_percpu_devid_irq, NULL, NULL);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -112,11 +147,12 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *riscv_intc_hwnode(void)
>  	return intc_domain->fwnode;
>  }
>  
> -static int __init riscv_intc_init_common(struct fwnode_handle *fn)
> +static int __init riscv_intc_init_common(struct fwnode_handle *fn,
> +					 struct irq_chip *chip)
>  {
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	intc_domain = irq_domain_create_tree(fn, &riscv_intc_domain_ops, NULL);
> +	intc_domain = irq_domain_create_tree(fn, &riscv_intc_domain_ops, chip);
>  	if (!intc_domain) {
>  		pr_err("unable to add IRQ domain\n");
>  		return -ENXIO;
> @@ -138,6 +174,7 @@ static int __init riscv_intc_init(struct device_node *node,
>  {
>  	int rc;
>  	unsigned long hartid;
> +	struct irq_chip *chip = &riscv_intc_chip;

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#variable-declarations

Thanks

        tglx