All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Manna,  Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
	"Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/15] drm/i915/alpm: Auxless wake time calculation for Xe3p
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 07:22:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf6a767a132ebd4ae25c4072d64cb4f790866b1e.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825054536.3455704-7-animesh.manna@intel.com>

On Tue, 2026-08-25 at 11:15 +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> Add support for auxless waketime calculation for DP2.1 ALPM
> as dependent parameter got changed.
> 
> v1: Initial version.
> v2: Use intel_dp_is_uhbr(). [Jani]
> v3:
> - Separate out switch to active latency calculation.
> - Use macro definition for ML_PHY_LOCK length. [Suraj]
> - Modify AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME bitfield for xe3lpd. [Suraj]

I think you should split this into separate patch.

> 
> Bspec: 71477
> Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c     | 61 +++++++++++++++--
> --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h |  2 +
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> index 4b15d96d0ad7..af2733805505 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> @@ -105,21 +105,50 @@ static int get_lfps_half_cycle_clocks(const
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  		1000 / (2 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT);
>  }
>  
> +#define ML_PHY_LOCK_LEN		252
> +#define ML_PHY_LOCK_LEN_UHBR	396
> +
>  static int get_tphy2_p2_to_p0(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
>  {
> -	return 12 * 1000;
> +	struct intel_display *display =
> to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> +
> +	return DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 35 ? (20 * 1000) : (12 *
> 1000);
>  }
>  
> -static int get_establishment_period(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
> +static int get_establishment_period(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +				    const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
>  {
>  	int t1 = 50 * 1000;
> -	int tps4 = 252;
> +	int tps4 = intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state) ?
> (ML_PHY_LOCK_LEN_UHBR * 32) :
> +		   (ML_PHY_LOCK_LEN * 10);

Add get_ml_phy_lock_len() and use intel_dp_link_symbol_size().

>  	/* port_clock is link rate in 10kbit/s units */
> -	int tml_phy_lock = 1000 * 1000 * tps4 / crtc_state-
> >port_clock;
> +	int tml_phy_lock = 1000 * 1000 * tps4 / crtc_state-
> >port_clock / 10;

10 should be intel_dp_link_symbol_size().

> +	int lttpr_count = 0;
>  	int tcds, establishment_period;
>  
> -	tcds = (7 + DIV_ROUND_UP(6500, tml_phy_lock) + 1) *
> tml_phy_lock;
> -	establishment_period = (SILENCE_PERIOD_TIME + t1 + tcds);
> +	if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)) {
> +		tcds = (7 + DIV_ROUND_UP(6500, tml_phy_lock) + 1) *
> tml_phy_lock;
> +	} else {
> +		tcds = 7 * tml_phy_lock;
> +		lttpr_count = drm_dp_lttpr_count(intel_dp-
> >lttpr_common_caps);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (lttpr_count) {
> +		int tlw = 13000;
> +		int tcs = 10000;

Where these numbers are coming from?

> +		int tlfps_period = get_lfps_cycle_time(crtc_state);
> +		int tdcs = (SILENCE_PERIOD_TIME + t1 + tcs +
> +			    (lttpr_count - 1) * (tlw +
> tlfps_period));
> +		int tacds = 70000;
> +		int tds = (lttpr_count - 1) * 7 * tml_phy_lock;

I think it would be easier to follow these formulas against Bspec if
you:

int tds = 7 * tml_phy_lock;
establishment_period = tlw + tlfps_period + tdcs + tacds + (lttpr_count
- 1) * tds + tcds;

BR,
Jouni Högander
> +
> +		/* tdrl is same as tcds*/
> +		establishment_period = tlw + tlfps_period + tdcs +
> tacds + tds + tcds;
> +	} else {
> +		/* TODO: Add a check for data realign by DPCD
> 0x116[3] */
> +
> +		establishment_period = (SILENCE_PERIOD_TIME + t1 +
> tcds);
> +	}
>  
>  	return establishment_period;
>  }
> @@ -141,12 +170,16 @@ static int get_establishment_period(const
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>   * within the CDS period complete within the CDS period regardless
> of
>   * entry into the period
>   * tML_PHY_LOCK = TPS4 Length * ( 10 / (Link Rate in MHz) )
> - * TPS4 Length = 252 Symbols
> + * ML_PHY_LOCK Length (8b/10b): 252
> + * ML_PHY_LOCK Length (128b/132b): 396
> + * TPS4 Length = ML_PHY_LOCK * Rate Div
> + * Rate Div = 32 for 128b/132b and 10 for 8b/10b.
>   */
> -static int _lnl_compute_aux_less_wake_time(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +static int _lnl_compute_aux_less_wake_time(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
> +					   const struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
>  	int tphy2_p2_to_p0 = get_tphy2_p2_to_p0(crtc_state);
> -	int establishment_period =
> get_establishment_period(crtc_state);
> +	int establishment_period =
> get_establishment_period(intel_dp, crtc_state);
>  
>  	return DIV_ROUND_UP(tphy2_p2_to_p0 +
> get_lfps_cycle_time(crtc_state) +
>  			    establishment_period, 1000);
> @@ -161,7 +194,7 @@ _lnl_compute_aux_less_alpm_params(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  		lfps_half_cycle;
>  
>  	aux_less_wake_time =
> -		_lnl_compute_aux_less_wake_time(crtc_state);
> +		_lnl_compute_aux_less_wake_time(intel_dp,
> crtc_state);
>  	aux_less_wake_lines = intel_usecs_to_scanlines(&crtc_state-
> >hw.adjusted_mode,
>  						      
> aux_less_wake_time);
>  	silence_period = get_silence_period_symbols(crtc_state);
> @@ -430,8 +463,12 @@ static void lnl_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  	if (intel_alpm_is_alpm_aux_less(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
>  		alpm_ctl = ALPM_CTL_ALPM_ENABLE |
>  			ALPM_CTL_ALPM_AUX_LESS_ENABLE |
> -			ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_SLEEP_HOLD_TIME_50_SYMBOLS
> |
> -			ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME(crtc_state-
> >alpm_state.aux_less_wake_lines);
> +			ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_SLEEP_HOLD_TIME_50_SYMBOLS
> ;
> +
> +		if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 35)
> +			alpm_ctl |=
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME(crtc_state-
> >alpm_state.aux_less_wake_lines);
> +		else
> +			alpm_ctl |=
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_XE3LPD(crtc_state-
> >alpm_state.aux_less_wake_lines);
>  
>  		if (intel_dp->as_sdp_supported) {
>  			u32 pr_alpm_ctl =
> get_pr_alpm_as_sdp_transmission_time(crtc_state);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> index 16a9e3af198d..8ec99bbd84b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> @@ -299,7 +299,9 @@
>  #define  ALPM_CTL_EXTENDED_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES		5
>  #define 
> ALPM_CTL_EXTENDED_FAST_WAKE_TIME(lines)	REG_FIELD_PREP(ALPM_CTL_EXTENDED_FAST_WAKE_TIME_MASK,(lines)-ALPM_CTL_EXTENDED_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES)
>  #define 
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK		REG_GENMASK(5, 0)
> +#define 
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK_XE3LPD	REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
>  #define 
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME(val)		REG_FIELD_PREP(ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK,val)
> +#define 
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_XE3LPD(val)	REG_FIELD_PREP(ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK_XE3LPD,val)
>  
>  #define _ALPM_CTL2_A	0x60954
>  #define ALPM_CTL2(dev_priv, tran)	_MMIO_TRANS2(dev_priv, tran,
> _ALPM_CTL2_A)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25  5:45 [PATCH v5 00/15] Enable DP2.1 alpm Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] drm/i915/alpm: Add DPCD definition for DP2.1 ALPM capability Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  7:55   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2026-08-27 10:51     ` Manna, Animesh
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] drm/i915/alpm: Move alpm sink capabality readout in separate function Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25  7:57   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2026-09-02  5:30     ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] drm/i915/alpm: alpm_init() for DP2.1 Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  7:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  6:09   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] drm/i915/alpm: Enable debugfs " Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  6:14   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] drm/i915/alpm: Refactor Auxless wake time calculation Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] drm/i915/alpm: Auxless wake time calculation for Xe3p Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  7:22   ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] drm/i915/alpm: table based establishment period Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  7:24   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] drm/i915/alpm: Half LFPS cycle calculation Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  8:41   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-09-02  9:30     ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] drm/i915/alpm: Modify LFPS cycle count for DP ALPM Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  8:49   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] drm/i915/alpm: Program LTTPR count for DP 2.1 ALPM Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  9:27   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] drm/i915/alpm: Enable MAC Transmitting LFPS for LT PHY Animesh Manna
2026-09-02  9:37   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] drm/i915/alpm: Replace is_edp() with alpm_is_possible() Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  9:49   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] drm/i915/alpm: Introduce has_alpm to decouple from pr/psr2/lobf Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:04   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] drm/i915/alpm: Compute and program switch to active latency Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:10   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] drm/i915/alpm: Program zero-based LFPS half cycle duration Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:17   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  7:11 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Enable DP2.1 alpm (rev5) Patchwork
2026-08-25  7:59 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2026-08-25  8:01 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-08-25  8:41 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-25 11:12 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2026-08-25 12:23 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf6a767a132ebd4ae25c4072d64cb4f790866b1e.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.