* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 01/12] mptcp: leverage skb deferral free
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 9:49 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 10:21 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 02/12] tcp: make tcp_rcvbuf_grow() accessible to mptcp code Paolo Abeni
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 2 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Usage of the skb deferral API is straight-forward; with multiple
subflows actives this allow moving part of the received application
load into multiple CPUs.
Also fix a typo in the related comment.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 7933291e991ce..9d95d24781509 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1943,12 +1943,13 @@ static int __mptcp_recvmsg_mskq(struct sock *sk,
}
if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
- /* avoid the indirect call, we know the destructor is sock_wfree */
+ /* avoid the indirect call, we know the destructor is sock_rfree */
skb->destructor = NULL;
+ skb->sk = NULL;
atomic_sub(skb->truesize, &sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
sk_mem_uncharge(sk, skb->truesize);
__skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
- __kfree_skb(skb);
+ skb_attempt_defer_free(skb);
msk->bytes_consumed += count;
}
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 01/12] mptcp: leverage skb deferral free
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 01/12] mptcp: leverage skb deferral free Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-19 9:49 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 10:21 ` Matthieu Baerts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2025-09-19 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
Hi Paolo,
Thanks for this patch.
On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 19:14 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Usage of the skb deferral API is straight-forward; with multiple
> subflows actives this allow moving part of the received application
> load into multiple CPUs.
>
> Also fix a typo in the related comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
LGTM!
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Thanks,
-Geliang
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 7933291e991ce..9d95d24781509 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -1943,12 +1943,13 @@ static int __mptcp_recvmsg_mskq(struct sock
> *sk,
> }
>
> if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
> - /* avoid the indirect call, we know the
> destructor is sock_wfree */
> + /* avoid the indirect call, we know the
> destructor is sock_rfree */
> skb->destructor = NULL;
> + skb->sk = NULL;
> atomic_sub(skb->truesize, &sk-
> >sk_rmem_alloc);
> sk_mem_uncharge(sk, skb->truesize);
> __skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
> - __kfree_skb(skb);
> + skb_attempt_defer_free(skb);
> msk->bytes_consumed += count;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 01/12] mptcp: leverage skb deferral free
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 01/12] mptcp: leverage skb deferral free Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 9:49 ` Geliang Tang
@ 2025-09-19 10:21 ` Matthieu Baerts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2025-09-19 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
Hi Paolo,
On 18/09/2025 19:14, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Usage of the skb deferral API is straight-forward; with multiple
> subflows actives this allow moving part of the received application
> load into multiple CPUs.
>
> Also fix a typo in the related comment.
Thank you, it looks good to me!
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 02/12] tcp: make tcp_rcvbuf_grow() accessible to mptcp code
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 01/12] mptcp: leverage skb deferral free Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 10:22 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 03/12] mptcp: rcvbuf auto-tuning improvement Paolo Abeni
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 2 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
To leverage the auto-tuning improvements brought by commit 2da35e4b4df9
("Merge branch 'tcp-receive-side-improvements'"), the MPTCP stack need
to access the mentioned helper.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
include/net/tcp.h | 1 +
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index e25340459ce4a..db2a4e05147fa 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ void tcp_delack_timer_handler(struct sock *sk);
int tcp_ioctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, int *karg);
enum skb_drop_reason tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
void tcp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+void tcp_rcvbuf_grow(struct sock *sk);
void tcp_rcv_space_adjust(struct sock *sk);
int tcp_twsk_unique(struct sock *sk, struct sock *sktw, void *twp);
void tcp_twsk_destructor(struct sock *sk);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index b2793e749cfd9..ad09995a1aaec 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static inline void tcp_rcv_rtt_measure_ts(struct sock *sk,
}
}
-static void tcp_rcvbuf_grow(struct sock *sk)
+void tcp_rcvbuf_grow(struct sock *sk)
{
const struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 02/12] tcp: make tcp_rcvbuf_grow() accessible to mptcp code
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 02/12] tcp: make tcp_rcvbuf_grow() accessible to mptcp code Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 10:22 ` Matthieu Baerts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2025-09-19 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 19:14 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> To leverage the auto-tuning improvements brought by commit
> 2da35e4b4df9
> ("Merge branch 'tcp-receive-side-improvements'"), the MPTCP stack
> need
> to access the mentioned helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
LGTM!
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Thanks,
-Geliang
> ---
> include/net/tcp.h | 1 +
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
> index e25340459ce4a..db2a4e05147fa 100644
> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
> @@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ void tcp_delack_timer_handler(struct sock *sk);
> int tcp_ioctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, int *karg);
> enum skb_drop_reason tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct
> sk_buff *skb);
> void tcp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
> +void tcp_rcvbuf_grow(struct sock *sk);
> void tcp_rcv_space_adjust(struct sock *sk);
> int tcp_twsk_unique(struct sock *sk, struct sock *sktw, void *twp);
> void tcp_twsk_destructor(struct sock *sk);
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index b2793e749cfd9..ad09995a1aaec 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static inline void tcp_rcv_rtt_measure_ts(struct
> sock *sk,
> }
> }
>
> -static void tcp_rcvbuf_grow(struct sock *sk)
> +void tcp_rcvbuf_grow(struct sock *sk)
> {
> const struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
> struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 02/12] tcp: make tcp_rcvbuf_grow() accessible to mptcp code
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 02/12] tcp: make tcp_rcvbuf_grow() accessible to mptcp code Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
@ 2025-09-19 10:22 ` Matthieu Baerts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2025-09-19 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
Hi Paolo,
On 18/09/2025 19:14, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> To leverage the auto-tuning improvements brought by commit 2da35e4b4df9
> ("Merge branch 'tcp-receive-side-improvements'"), the MPTCP stack need
> to access the mentioned helper.
Thank you, it looks good to me!
Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 03/12] mptcp: rcvbuf auto-tuning improvement
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 01/12] mptcp: leverage skb deferral free Paolo Abeni
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 02/12] tcp: make tcp_rcvbuf_grow() accessible to mptcp code Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 10:22 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 04/12] mptcp: introduce the mptcp_init_skb helper Paolo Abeni
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 2 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Apply to the MPTCP auto-tuning the same improvements introduced for the
TCP protocol by the merge commit 2da35e4b4df9 ("Merge branch
'tcp-receive-side-improvements'").
The main difference is that TCP subflow and the main MPTCP socket need
to account separately for OoO: MPTCP does not care for TCP-level OoO
and vice versa, as a consequence do not reflect MPTCP-level rcvbuf
increase due to OoO packets at the subflow level.
This refeactor additionally allow dropping the msk receive buffer update
at receive time, as the latter only intended to cope with subflow receive
buffer increase due to OoO packets.
Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/487
Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/559
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- fix unused variable
- reword the commit message
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 4 +-
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 9d95d24781509..162abafe3f320 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -179,6 +179,30 @@ static bool mptcp_ooo_try_coalesce(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sk_buff *to,
return mptcp_try_coalesce((struct sock *)msk, to, from);
}
+static bool mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+ int rcvwin, rcvbuf;
+
+ if (!READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_moderate_rcvbuf) ||
+ (sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK))
+ return false;
+
+ rcvwin = ((u64)msk->rcvq_space.space << 1);
+
+ if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&msk->out_of_order_queue))
+ rcvwin += MPTCP_SKB_CB(msk->ooo_last_skb)->end_seq - msk->ack_seq;
+
+ rcvbuf = min_t(u64, mptcp_space_from_win(sk, rcvwin),
+ READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_rmem[2]));
+
+ if (rcvbuf > sk->sk_rcvbuf) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf, rcvbuf);
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
/* "inspired" by tcp_data_queue_ofo(), main differences:
* - use mptcp seqs
* - don't cope with sacks
@@ -292,6 +316,9 @@ static void mptcp_data_queue_ofo(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sk_buff *skb)
end:
skb_condense(skb);
skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
+ /* do not grow rcvbuf for not-yet-accepted or orphaned sockets. */
+ if (sk->sk_socket)
+ mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(sk);
}
static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk,
@@ -784,18 +811,10 @@ static bool move_skbs_to_msk(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
return moved;
}
-static void __mptcp_rcvbuf_update(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
-{
- if (unlikely(ssk->sk_rcvbuf > sk->sk_rcvbuf))
- WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf, ssk->sk_rcvbuf);
-}
-
static void __mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
{
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
- __mptcp_rcvbuf_update(sk, ssk);
-
/* Wake-up the reader only for in-sequence data */
if (move_skbs_to_msk(msk, ssk) && mptcp_epollin_ready(sk))
sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
@@ -2014,48 +2033,26 @@ static void mptcp_rcv_space_adjust(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int copied)
if (msk->rcvq_space.copied <= msk->rcvq_space.space)
goto new_measure;
- if (READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_moderate_rcvbuf) &&
- !(sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK)) {
- u64 rcvwin, grow;
- int rcvbuf;
-
- rcvwin = ((u64)msk->rcvq_space.copied << 1) + 16 * advmss;
-
- grow = rcvwin * (msk->rcvq_space.copied - msk->rcvq_space.space);
-
- do_div(grow, msk->rcvq_space.space);
- rcvwin += (grow << 1);
-
- rcvbuf = min_t(u64, mptcp_space_from_win(sk, rcvwin),
- READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_rmem[2]));
-
- if (rcvbuf > sk->sk_rcvbuf) {
- u32 window_clamp;
-
- window_clamp = mptcp_win_from_space(sk, rcvbuf);
- WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf, rcvbuf);
+ msk->rcvq_space.space = msk->rcvq_space.copied;
+ if (mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(sk)) {
- /* Make subflows follow along. If we do not do this, we
- * get drops at subflow level if skbs can't be moved to
- * the mptcp rx queue fast enough (announced rcv_win can
- * exceed ssk->sk_rcvbuf).
- */
- mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
- struct sock *ssk;
- bool slow;
+ /* Make subflows follow along. If we do not do this, we
+ * get drops at subflow level if skbs can't be moved to
+ * the mptcp rx queue fast enough (announced rcv_win can
+ * exceed ssk->sk_rcvbuf).
+ */
+ mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
+ struct sock *ssk;
+ bool slow;
- ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
- slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
- WRITE_ONCE(ssk->sk_rcvbuf, rcvbuf);
- WRITE_ONCE(tcp_sk(ssk)->window_clamp, window_clamp);
- if (tcp_can_send_ack(ssk))
- tcp_cleanup_rbuf(ssk, 1);
- unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
- }
+ ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
+ slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
+ tcp_sk(ssk)->rcvq_space.space = msk->rcvq_space.copied;
+ tcp_rcvbuf_grow(ssk);
+ unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
}
}
- msk->rcvq_space.space = msk->rcvq_space.copied;
new_measure:
msk->rcvq_space.copied = 0;
msk->rcvq_space.time = mstamp;
@@ -2084,11 +2081,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk)
if (list_empty(&msk->conn_list))
return false;
- /* verify we can move any data from the subflow, eventually updating */
- if (!(sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK))
- mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow)
- __mptcp_rcvbuf_update(sk, subflow->tcp_sock);
-
subflow = list_first_entry(&msk->conn_list,
struct mptcp_subflow_context, node);
for (;;) {
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 9b5a248bad404..6ac58e92a1aa3 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -342,8 +342,8 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
struct mptcp_pm_data pm;
struct mptcp_sched_ops *sched;
struct {
- u32 space; /* bytes copied in last measurement window */
- u32 copied; /* bytes copied in this measurement window */
+ int space; /* bytes copied in last measurement window */
+ int copied; /* bytes copied in this measurement window */
u64 time; /* start time of measurement window */
u64 rtt_us; /* last maximum rtt of subflows */
} rcvq_space;
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 03/12] mptcp: rcvbuf auto-tuning improvement
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 03/12] mptcp: rcvbuf auto-tuning improvement Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 10:22 ` Matthieu Baerts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2025-09-19 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 19:14 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Apply to the MPTCP auto-tuning the same improvements introduced for
> the
> TCP protocol by the merge commit 2da35e4b4df9 ("Merge branch
> 'tcp-receive-side-improvements'").
>
> The main difference is that TCP subflow and the main MPTCP socket
> need
> to account separately for OoO: MPTCP does not care for TCP-level OoO
> and vice versa, as a consequence do not reflect MPTCP-level rcvbuf
> increase due to OoO packets at the subflow level.
>
> This refeactor additionally allow dropping the msk receive buffer
> update
> at receive time, as the latter only intended to cope with subflow
> receive
> buffer increase due to OoO packets.
>
> Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/487
> Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/559
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
LGTM!
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Thanks,
-Geliang
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - fix unused variable
> - reword the commit message
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> --
> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 4 +-
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 9d95d24781509..162abafe3f320 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -179,6 +179,30 @@ static bool mptcp_ooo_try_coalesce(struct
> mptcp_sock *msk, struct sk_buff *to,
> return mptcp_try_coalesce((struct sock *)msk, to, from);
> }
>
> +static bool mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> + int rcvwin, rcvbuf;
> +
> + if (!READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)-
> >ipv4.sysctl_tcp_moderate_rcvbuf) ||
> + (sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK))
> + return false;
> +
> + rcvwin = ((u64)msk->rcvq_space.space << 1);
> +
> + if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&msk->out_of_order_queue))
> + rcvwin += MPTCP_SKB_CB(msk->ooo_last_skb)->end_seq -
> msk->ack_seq;
> +
> + rcvbuf = min_t(u64, mptcp_space_from_win(sk, rcvwin),
> + READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)-
> >ipv4.sysctl_tcp_rmem[2]));
> +
> + if (rcvbuf > sk->sk_rcvbuf) {
> + WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf, rcvbuf);
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /* "inspired" by tcp_data_queue_ofo(), main differences:
> * - use mptcp seqs
> * - don't cope with sacks
> @@ -292,6 +316,9 @@ static void mptcp_data_queue_ofo(struct
> mptcp_sock *msk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> end:
> skb_condense(skb);
> skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
> + /* do not grow rcvbuf for not-yet-accepted or orphaned
> sockets. */
> + if (sk->sk_socket)
> + mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(sk);
> }
>
> static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock
> *ssk,
> @@ -784,18 +811,10 @@ static bool move_skbs_to_msk(struct mptcp_sock
> *msk, struct sock *ssk)
> return moved;
> }
>
> -static void __mptcp_rcvbuf_update(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
> -{
> - if (unlikely(ssk->sk_rcvbuf > sk->sk_rcvbuf))
> - WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf, ssk->sk_rcvbuf);
> -}
> -
> static void __mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
> {
> struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
>
> - __mptcp_rcvbuf_update(sk, ssk);
> -
> /* Wake-up the reader only for in-sequence data */
> if (move_skbs_to_msk(msk, ssk) && mptcp_epollin_ready(sk))
> sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
> @@ -2014,48 +2033,26 @@ static void mptcp_rcv_space_adjust(struct
> mptcp_sock *msk, int copied)
> if (msk->rcvq_space.copied <= msk->rcvq_space.space)
> goto new_measure;
>
> - if (READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_moderate_rcvbuf)
> &&
> - !(sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK)) {
> - u64 rcvwin, grow;
> - int rcvbuf;
> -
> - rcvwin = ((u64)msk->rcvq_space.copied << 1) + 16 *
> advmss;
> -
> - grow = rcvwin * (msk->rcvq_space.copied - msk-
> >rcvq_space.space);
> -
> - do_div(grow, msk->rcvq_space.space);
> - rcvwin += (grow << 1);
> -
> - rcvbuf = min_t(u64, mptcp_space_from_win(sk,
> rcvwin),
> - READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)-
> >ipv4.sysctl_tcp_rmem[2]));
> -
> - if (rcvbuf > sk->sk_rcvbuf) {
> - u32 window_clamp;
> -
> - window_clamp = mptcp_win_from_space(sk,
> rcvbuf);
> - WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf, rcvbuf);
> + msk->rcvq_space.space = msk->rcvq_space.copied;
> + if (mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(sk)) {
>
> - /* Make subflows follow along. If we do not
> do this, we
> - * get drops at subflow level if skbs can't
> be moved to
> - * the mptcp rx queue fast enough (announced
> rcv_win can
> - * exceed ssk->sk_rcvbuf).
> - */
> - mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
> - struct sock *ssk;
> - bool slow;
> + /* Make subflows follow along. If we do not do
> this, we
> + * get drops at subflow level if skbs can't be moved
> to
> + * the mptcp rx queue fast enough (announced rcv_win
> can
> + * exceed ssk->sk_rcvbuf).
> + */
> + mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
> + struct sock *ssk;
> + bool slow;
>
> - ssk =
> mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
> - slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
> - WRITE_ONCE(ssk->sk_rcvbuf, rcvbuf);
> - WRITE_ONCE(tcp_sk(ssk)-
> >window_clamp, window_clamp);
> - if (tcp_can_send_ack(ssk))
> - tcp_cleanup_rbuf(ssk, 1);
> - unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
> - }
> + ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
> + slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
> + tcp_sk(ssk)->rcvq_space.space = msk-
> >rcvq_space.copied;
> + tcp_rcvbuf_grow(ssk);
> + unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
> }
> }
>
> - msk->rcvq_space.space = msk->rcvq_space.copied;
> new_measure:
> msk->rcvq_space.copied = 0;
> msk->rcvq_space.time = mstamp;
> @@ -2084,11 +2081,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk)
> if (list_empty(&msk->conn_list))
> return false;
>
> - /* verify we can move any data from the subflow, eventually
> updating */
> - if (!(sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK))
> - mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow)
> - __mptcp_rcvbuf_update(sk, subflow-
> >tcp_sock);
> -
> subflow = list_first_entry(&msk->conn_list,
> struct mptcp_subflow_context,
> node);
> for (;;) {
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index 9b5a248bad404..6ac58e92a1aa3 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -342,8 +342,8 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
> struct mptcp_pm_data pm;
> struct mptcp_sched_ops *sched;
> struct {
> - u32 space; /* bytes copied in last measurement
> window */
> - u32 copied; /* bytes copied in this measurement
> window */
> + int space; /* bytes copied in last measurement
> window */
> + int copied; /* bytes copied in this measurement
> window */
> u64 time; /* start time of measurement window
> */
> u64 rtt_us; /* last maximum rtt of subflows */
> } rcvq_space;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 03/12] mptcp: rcvbuf auto-tuning improvement
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 03/12] mptcp: rcvbuf auto-tuning improvement Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
@ 2025-09-19 10:22 ` Matthieu Baerts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2025-09-19 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
Hi Paolo,
On 18/09/2025 19:14, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Apply to the MPTCP auto-tuning the same improvements introduced for the
> TCP protocol by the merge commit 2da35e4b4df9 ("Merge branch
> 'tcp-receive-side-improvements'").
>
> The main difference is that TCP subflow and the main MPTCP socket need
> to account separately for OoO: MPTCP does not care for TCP-level OoO
> and vice versa, as a consequence do not reflect MPTCP-level rcvbuf
> increase due to OoO packets at the subflow level.
>
> This refeactor additionally allow dropping the msk receive buffer update
> at receive time, as the latter only intended to cope with subflow receive
> buffer increase due to OoO packets.
>
> Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/487
> Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/559
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Thank you for looking at that!
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - fix unused variable
> - reword the commit message
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 4 +-
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 9d95d24781509..162abafe3f320 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -179,6 +179,30 @@ static bool mptcp_ooo_try_coalesce(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sk_buff *to,
> return mptcp_try_coalesce((struct sock *)msk, to, from);
> }
>
> +static bool mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(struct sock *sk)
detail: can we add the similar comment as the one below for
mptcp_data_queue_ofo()?
/* "inspired" by tcp_rcvbuf_grow(), main differences:
* - ...
I can do the modification when applying the patches.
> +{
> + struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> + int rcvwin, rcvbuf;
> +
> + if (!READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_moderate_rcvbuf) ||
> + (sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK))
> + return false;
> +
> + rcvwin = ((u64)msk->rcvq_space.space << 1);
Why do you need the u64 cast here? (and the parenthesis)
> +
> + if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&msk->out_of_order_queue))
> + rcvwin += MPTCP_SKB_CB(msk->ooo_last_skb)->end_seq - msk->ack_seq;
> +
> + rcvbuf = min_t(u64, mptcp_space_from_win(sk, rcvwin),
> + READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_rmem[2]));
detail: mptcp_space_from_win() and *sysctl_tcp_rmem are on 32 bits, no
need to do a 'min_t(u64)'. Maybe we can copy what is done in
tcp_rcvbuf_grow()?
rcvbuf = min_t(u32, ...
While at it, could we get even closer to tcp_rcvbuf_grow()? Declaring
and using 'net' and 'cap' variable + keep the comments? By doing that,
it would be easier to spot differences :)
I can also do the modifications when applying the patches if you prefer.
The suggested modifications are minor, and the rest looks good to me!
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 04/12] mptcp: introduce the mptcp_init_skb helper.
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 03/12] mptcp: rcvbuf auto-tuning improvement Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 12:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 05/12] mptcp: remove unneeded mptcp_move_skb() Paolo Abeni
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Factor out all the skb initialization step in a new helper and
use it. Note that this change moves the MPTCP CB initialization
earlier: we can do such step as soon as the skb leaves the
subflow socket receive queues.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- drop subflow argument from mptcp_init_skb()
- change msk args to sock arg in __mptcp_move_skb()
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 162abafe3f320..048056b29a92d 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -321,27 +321,11 @@ static void mptcp_data_queue_ofo(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sk_buff *skb)
mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(sk);
}
-static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk,
- struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int offset,
- size_t copy_len)
+static void mptcp_init_skb(struct sock *ssk,
+ struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, int copy_len)
{
- struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
- struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
- struct sk_buff *tail;
- bool has_rxtstamp;
-
- __skb_unlink(skb, &ssk->sk_receive_queue);
-
- skb_ext_reset(skb);
- skb_orphan(skb);
-
- /* try to fetch required memory from subflow */
- if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb, skb->truesize)) {
- MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED);
- goto drop;
- }
-
- has_rxtstamp = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->has_rxtstamp;
+ const struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
+ bool has_rxtstamp = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->has_rxtstamp;
/* the skb map_seq accounts for the skb offset:
* mptcp_subflow_get_mapped_dsn() is based on the current tp->copied_seq
@@ -353,6 +337,24 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk,
MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->has_rxtstamp = has_rxtstamp;
MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->cant_coalesce = 0;
+ __skb_unlink(skb, &ssk->sk_receive_queue);
+
+ skb_ext_reset(skb);
+ skb_dst_drop(skb);
+}
+
+static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ u64 copy_len = MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq;
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+ struct sk_buff *tail;
+
+ /* try to fetch required memory from subflow */
+ if (!sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb, skb->truesize)) {
+ MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED);
+ goto drop;
+ }
+
if (MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq == msk->ack_seq) {
/* in sequence */
msk->bytes_received += copy_len;
@@ -673,7 +675,9 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
if (offset < skb->len) {
size_t len = skb->len - offset;
- ret = __mptcp_move_skb(msk, ssk, skb, offset, len) || ret;
+ mptcp_init_skb(ssk, skb, offset, len);
+ skb_orphan(skb);
+ ret = __mptcp_move_skb(sk, skb) || ret;
seq += len;
if (unlikely(map_remaining < len)) {
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 05/12] mptcp: remove unneeded mptcp_move_skb()
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 04/12] mptcp: introduce the mptcp_init_skb helper Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 12:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 06/12] mptcp: factor out a basic skb coalesce helper Paolo Abeni
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 2 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Since commit b7535cfed223 ("mptcp: drop legacy code around RX EOF"),
sk_shutdown can't change during the main recvmsg loop, we can drop
the related race breaker.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 048056b29a92d..19b5b925e2acc 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2202,14 +2202,8 @@ static int mptcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
break;
}
- if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
- /* race breaker: the shutdown could be after the
- * previous receive queue check
- */
- if (__mptcp_move_skbs(sk))
- continue;
+ if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
break;
- }
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE) {
copied = -ENOTCONN;
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 05/12] mptcp: remove unneeded mptcp_move_skb()
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 05/12] mptcp: remove unneeded mptcp_move_skb() Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 12:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2025-09-19 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 19:14 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Since commit b7535cfed223 ("mptcp: drop legacy code around RX EOF"),
> sk_shutdown can't change during the main recvmsg loop, we can drop
> the related race breaker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
LGTM!
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Thanks,
-Geliang
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 048056b29a92d..19b5b925e2acc 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -2202,14 +2202,8 @@ static int mptcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
> struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> break;
> }
>
> - if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
> - /* race breaker: the shutdown could
> be after the
> - * previous receive queue check
> - */
> - if (__mptcp_move_skbs(sk))
> - continue;
> + if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
> break;
> - }
>
> if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE) {
> copied = -ENOTCONN;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 05/12] mptcp: remove unneeded mptcp_move_skb()
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 05/12] mptcp: remove unneeded mptcp_move_skb() Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
@ 2025-09-19 12:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2025-09-19 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
Hi Paolo,
On 18/09/2025 19:14, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Since commit b7535cfed223 ("mptcp: drop legacy code around RX EOF"),
> sk_shutdown can't change during the main recvmsg loop, we can drop
> the related race breaker.
Good catch, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 06/12] mptcp: factor out a basic skb coalesce helper
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 05/12] mptcp: remove unneeded mptcp_move_skb() Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 12:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 07/12] mptcp: minor move_skbs_to_msk() cleanup Paolo Abeni
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
The upcoming patch will introduced backlog processing for MPTCP
socket, and we want to leverage coalescing in such data path.
Factor out the relevant bits not touching memory accounting to
deal with such use-case.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 19b5b925e2acc..66ad9a38a6082 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -142,22 +142,34 @@ static void mptcp_drop(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
__kfree_skb(skb);
}
-static bool mptcp_try_coalesce(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *to,
- struct sk_buff *from)
+static int __mptcp_try_coalesce(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *to,
+ struct sk_buff *from, bool *fragstolen)
{
- bool fragstolen;
+ int limit = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf);
int delta;
if (unlikely(MPTCP_SKB_CB(to)->cant_coalesce) ||
MPTCP_SKB_CB(from)->offset ||
- ((to->len + from->len) > (sk->sk_rcvbuf >> 3)) ||
- !skb_try_coalesce(to, from, &fragstolen, &delta))
- return false;
+ ((to->len + from->len) > (limit >> 3)) ||
+ !skb_try_coalesce(to, from, fragstolen, &delta))
+ return 0;
pr_debug("colesced seq %llx into %llx new len %d new end seq %llx\n",
MPTCP_SKB_CB(from)->map_seq, MPTCP_SKB_CB(to)->map_seq,
to->len, MPTCP_SKB_CB(from)->end_seq);
MPTCP_SKB_CB(to)->end_seq = MPTCP_SKB_CB(from)->end_seq;
+ return delta;
+}
+
+static bool mptcp_try_coalesce(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *to,
+ struct sk_buff *from)
+{
+ bool fragstolen;
+ int delta;
+
+ delta = __mptcp_try_coalesce(sk, to, from, &fragstolen);
+ if (!delta)
+ return false;
/* note the fwd memory can reach a negative value after accounting
* for the delta, but the later skb free will restore a non
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 06/12] mptcp: factor out a basic skb coalesce helper
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 06/12] mptcp: factor out a basic skb coalesce helper Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-19 12:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2025-09-19 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
Hi Paolo,
On 18/09/2025 19:14, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> The upcoming patch will introduced backlog processing for MPTCP
> socket, and we want to leverage coalescing in such data path.
>
> Factor out the relevant bits not touching memory accounting to
> deal with such use-case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 19b5b925e2acc..66ad9a38a6082 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -142,22 +142,34 @@ static void mptcp_drop(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> __kfree_skb(skb);
> }
>
> -static bool mptcp_try_coalesce(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *to,
> - struct sk_buff *from)
> +static int __mptcp_try_coalesce(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *to,
> + struct sk_buff *from, bool *fragstolen)
> {
> - bool fragstolen;
> + int limit = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf);
> int delta;
>
> if (unlikely(MPTCP_SKB_CB(to)->cant_coalesce) ||
> MPTCP_SKB_CB(from)->offset ||
> - ((to->len + from->len) > (sk->sk_rcvbuf >> 3)) ||
> - !skb_try_coalesce(to, from, &fragstolen, &delta))
> - return false;
> + ((to->len + from->len) > (limit >> 3)) ||
> + !skb_try_coalesce(to, from, fragstolen, &delta))
> + return 0;
>
> pr_debug("colesced seq %llx into %llx new len %d new end seq %llx\n",
> MPTCP_SKB_CB(from)->map_seq, MPTCP_SKB_CB(to)->map_seq,
> to->len, MPTCP_SKB_CB(from)->end_seq);
> MPTCP_SKB_CB(to)->end_seq = MPTCP_SKB_CB(from)->end_seq;
> + return delta;
> +}
> +
> +static bool mptcp_try_coalesce(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *to,
> + struct sk_buff *from)
> +{
> + bool fragstolen;
> + int delta;
> +
> + delta = __mptcp_try_coalesce(sk, to, from, &fragstolen);
> + if (!delta)
> + return false;
Small idea: should __mptcp_try_coalesce() returns a bool, and take a
pointer to delta? Similar to what skb_try_coalesce() is doing then.
Here, you will then have:
if (!__mptcp_try_coalesce(sk, to, from, &fragstolen, &delta))
return false;
But that's a detail, if you prefer your version, I'm fine with it:
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 07/12] mptcp: minor move_skbs_to_msk() cleanup
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 06/12] mptcp: factor out a basic skb coalesce helper Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 12:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 08/12] mptcp: cleanup fallback data fin reception Paolo Abeni
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 2 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
Such function is called only by __mptcp_data_ready(), which in turn
is always invoked when msk is not owned by the user: we can drop the
redundant, related check.
Additionally mptcp needs to propagate the socket error only for
current subflow.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 66ad9a38a6082..02be42d3d11e6 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -810,12 +810,8 @@ static bool move_skbs_to_msk(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
moved = __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk);
__mptcp_ofo_queue(msk);
- if (unlikely(ssk->sk_err)) {
- if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))
- __mptcp_error_report(sk);
- else
- __set_bit(MPTCP_ERROR_REPORT, &msk->cb_flags);
- }
+ if (unlikely(ssk->sk_err))
+ __mptcp_subflow_error_report(sk, ssk);
/* If the moves have caught up with the DATA_FIN sequence number
* it's time to ack the DATA_FIN and change socket state, but
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 07/12] mptcp: minor move_skbs_to_msk() cleanup
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 07/12] mptcp: minor move_skbs_to_msk() cleanup Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 12:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2025-09-19 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 19:14 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Such function is called only by __mptcp_data_ready(), which in turn
> is always invoked when msk is not owned by the user: we can drop the
> redundant, related check.
>
> Additionally mptcp needs to propagate the socket error only for
> current subflow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
LGTM!
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Thanks,
-Geliang
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 66ad9a38a6082..02be42d3d11e6 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -810,12 +810,8 @@ static bool move_skbs_to_msk(struct mptcp_sock
> *msk, struct sock *ssk)
>
> moved = __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk);
> __mptcp_ofo_queue(msk);
> - if (unlikely(ssk->sk_err)) {
> - if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))
> - __mptcp_error_report(sk);
> - else
> - __set_bit(MPTCP_ERROR_REPORT, &msk-
> >cb_flags);
> - }
> + if (unlikely(ssk->sk_err))
> + __mptcp_subflow_error_report(sk, ssk);
>
> /* If the moves have caught up with the DATA_FIN sequence
> number
> * it's time to ack the DATA_FIN and change socket state,
> but
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 07/12] mptcp: minor move_skbs_to_msk() cleanup
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 07/12] mptcp: minor move_skbs_to_msk() cleanup Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 9:50 ` Geliang Tang
@ 2025-09-19 12:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-19 15:01 ` Paolo Abeni
1 sibling, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2025-09-19 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp
Hi Paolo,
On 18/09/2025 19:14, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Such function is called only by __mptcp_data_ready(), which in turn
> is always invoked when msk is not owned by the user: we can drop the
> redundant, related check.
>
> Additionally mptcp needs to propagate the socket error only for
> current subflow.
Ah yes, good point! Should this be considered as a dedicated fix or is
the impact not important?
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 07/12] mptcp: minor move_skbs_to_msk() cleanup
2025-09-19 12:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
@ 2025-09-19 15:01 ` Paolo Abeni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-19 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthieu Baerts, mptcp
On 9/19/25 2:36 PM, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> On 18/09/2025 19:14, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> Such function is called only by __mptcp_data_ready(), which in turn
>> is always invoked when msk is not owned by the user: we can drop the
>> redundant, related check.
>>
>> Additionally mptcp needs to propagate the socket error only for
>> current subflow.
>
> Ah yes, good point! Should this be considered as a dedicated fix or is
> the impact not important?
I think it is more an optimization/cleanup than a fix.
/P
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 08/12] mptcp: cleanup fallback data fin reception
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 07/12] mptcp: minor move_skbs_to_msk() cleanup Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 09/12] mptcp: leverage the sk backlog for RX packet processing Paolo Abeni
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
MPTCP currently generate a dummy data_fin for fallback socket
when the fallback subflow has completed data reception using
the current ack_seq.
We are going to introduce backlog usage for the msk soon, even
for fallback sockets: the above condition will be not be correct
as it will ignore data_seq sitting in the backlog.
Instead generate the dummy data_fin when the last data packet is
extracted by the fallback subflow.
The scenario with fallback socket receiving a reset while the
receive queue empty is caught via the generic 'all subflows closed'
timeout: ensure such timeout is zero for fallback sockets.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/ctrl.c | 2 ++
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 16 ++++++++--------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/ctrl.c b/net/mptcp/ctrl.c
index fed40dae5583a..4f7795968abe2 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/ctrl.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/ctrl.c
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ unsigned int mptcp_stale_loss_cnt(const struct net *net)
unsigned int mptcp_close_timeout(const struct sock *sk)
{
+ if (__mptcp_check_fallback(mptcp_sk(sk)))
+ return 0;
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
return TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN;
return mptcp_get_pernet(sock_net(sk))->close_timeout;
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index e8325890a3223..9baf3e54e46f2 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -1297,14 +1297,6 @@ static void subflow_sched_work_if_closed(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ss
if (!test_and_set_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, &msk->flags))
mptcp_schedule_work(sk);
-
- /* when the fallback subflow closes the rx side, trigger a 'dummy'
- * ingress data fin, so that the msk state will follow along
- */
- if (__mptcp_check_fallback(msk) && subflow_is_done(ssk) &&
- msk->first == ssk &&
- mptcp_update_rcv_data_fin(msk, READ_ONCE(msk->ack_seq), true))
- mptcp_schedule_work(sk);
}
static bool mptcp_subflow_fail(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
@@ -1437,6 +1429,14 @@ static bool subflow_check_data_avail(struct sock *ssk)
subflow->map_data_len = skb->len;
subflow->map_subflow_seq = tcp_sk(ssk)->copied_seq - subflow->ssn_offset;
WRITE_ONCE(subflow->data_avail, true);
+
+ /* last skb in closed fallback subflow: we are at data fin */
+ if (subflow_is_done(ssk) && ssk == msk->first &&
+ skb == skb_peek_tail(&ssk->sk_receive_queue)) {
+ mptcp_update_rcv_data_fin(msk, subflow->map_seq +
+ subflow->map_data_len, true);
+ subflow->map_data_fin = 1;
+ }
return true;
}
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 09/12] mptcp: leverage the sk backlog for RX packet processing.
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 08/12] mptcp: cleanup fallback data fin reception Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 10/12] mptcp: prevernt __mptcp_move_skbs() interfering with the fastpath Paolo Abeni
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
This streamline the RX path implementation and improves the RX
performances by reducing the subflow-level locking and the amount of
work done under the msk socket lock; the implementation mirror closely
the TCP backlog processing.
Note that MPTCP needs now to traverse the existing subflow looking for
data that was left there due to the msk receive buffer full, only after
that recvmsg completely empties the receive queue.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 02be42d3d11e6..07326c1e6fbae 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -355,6 +355,27 @@ static void mptcp_init_skb(struct sock *ssk,
skb_dst_drop(skb);
}
+static void __mptcp_add_backlog(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
+ struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *tail = sk->sk_backlog.tail;
+ bool fragstolen;
+ int delta;
+
+ if (tail && MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq == MPTCP_SKB_CB(tail)->end_seq) {
+ delta = __mptcp_try_coalesce(sk, tail, skb, &fragstolen);
+ if (delta) {
+ sk->sk_backlog.len += delta;
+ kfree_skb_partial(skb, fragstolen);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* mptcp checks the limit before adding the skb to the backlog */
+ __sk_add_backlog(sk, skb);
+ sk->sk_backlog.len += skb->truesize;
+}
+
static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
u64 copy_len = MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq;
@@ -643,7 +664,7 @@ static void mptcp_dss_corruption(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
}
static bool __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
- struct sock *ssk)
+ struct sock *ssk, bool own_msk)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
@@ -654,12 +675,13 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
pr_debug("msk=%p ssk=%p\n", msk, ssk);
tp = tcp_sk(ssk);
do {
+ int mem = own_msk ? sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk) : sk->sk_backlog.len;
u32 map_remaining, offset;
u32 seq = tp->copied_seq;
struct sk_buff *skb;
bool fin;
- if (sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk) > sk->sk_rcvbuf)
+ if (mem > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf))
break;
/* try to move as much data as available */
@@ -689,7 +711,11 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
mptcp_init_skb(ssk, skb, offset, len);
skb_orphan(skb);
- ret = __mptcp_move_skb(sk, skb) || ret;
+
+ if (own_msk)
+ ret |= __mptcp_move_skb(sk, skb);
+ else
+ __mptcp_add_backlog(sk, ssk, skb);
seq += len;
if (unlikely(map_remaining < len)) {
@@ -710,7 +736,7 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
} while (more_data_avail);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret && own_msk)
msk->last_data_recv = tcp_jiffies32;
return ret;
}
@@ -808,7 +834,7 @@ static bool move_skbs_to_msk(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
bool moved;
- moved = __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk);
+ moved = __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk, true);
__mptcp_ofo_queue(msk);
if (unlikely(ssk->sk_err))
__mptcp_subflow_error_report(sk, ssk);
@@ -823,18 +849,10 @@ static bool move_skbs_to_msk(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
return moved;
}
-static void __mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
-{
- struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
-
- /* Wake-up the reader only for in-sequence data */
- if (move_skbs_to_msk(msk, ssk) && mptcp_epollin_ready(sk))
- sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
-}
-
void mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
/* The peer can send data while we are shutting down this
* subflow at msk destruction time, but we must avoid enqueuing
@@ -844,13 +862,33 @@ void mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
return;
mptcp_data_lock(sk);
- if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))
- __mptcp_data_ready(sk, ssk);
- else
- __set_bit(MPTCP_DEQUEUE, &mptcp_sk(sk)->cb_flags);
+ if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
+ /* Wake-up the reader only for in-sequence data */
+ if (move_skbs_to_msk(msk, ssk) && mptcp_epollin_ready(sk))
+ sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
+ } else {
+ __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk, false);
+ if (unlikely(ssk->sk_err))
+ __set_bit(MPTCP_ERROR_REPORT, &msk->cb_flags);
+ }
mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
}
+static int mptcp_move_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+
+ if (__mptcp_move_skb(sk, skb)) {
+ msk->last_data_recv = tcp_jiffies32;
+ __mptcp_ofo_queue(msk);
+ /* notify ack seq update */
+ mptcp_cleanup_rbuf(msk, 0);
+ mptcp_check_data_fin(sk);
+ sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void mptcp_subflow_joined(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
{
mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk)->map_seq = READ_ONCE(msk->ack_seq);
@@ -2112,7 +2150,7 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk)
ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
slowpath = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
- ret = __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk) || ret;
+ ret = __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk, true) || ret;
if (unlikely(ssk->sk_err))
__mptcp_error_report(sk);
unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slowpath);
@@ -2188,8 +2226,12 @@ static int mptcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
copied += bytes_read;
- if (skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue) && __mptcp_move_skbs(sk))
- continue;
+ if (skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) {
+ __sk_flush_backlog(sk);
+ if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue) ||
+ __mptcp_move_skbs(sk))
+ continue;
+ }
/* only the MPTCP socket status is relevant here. The exit
* conditions mirror closely tcp_recvmsg()
@@ -2537,7 +2579,6 @@ static void __mptcp_close_subflow(struct sock *sk)
mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow);
}
-
}
static bool mptcp_close_tout_expired(const struct sock *sk)
@@ -3121,6 +3162,13 @@ bool __mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
pr_debug("msk=%p state=%d\n", sk, sk->sk_state);
mptcp_pm_connection_closed(msk);
+ /* process the backlog; note that it never destroies the msk */
+ local_bh_disable();
+ bh_lock_sock(sk);
+ __release_sock(sk);
+ bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+ local_bh_enable();
+
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE) {
__mptcp_destroy_sock(sk);
do_cancel_work = true;
@@ -3421,8 +3469,7 @@ void __mptcp_check_push(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
#define MPTCP_FLAGS_PROCESS_CTX_NEED (BIT(MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING) | \
BIT(MPTCP_RETRANSMIT) | \
- BIT(MPTCP_FLUSH_JOIN_LIST) | \
- BIT(MPTCP_DEQUEUE))
+ BIT(MPTCP_FLUSH_JOIN_LIST))
/* processes deferred events and flush wmem */
static void mptcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
@@ -3456,11 +3503,6 @@ static void mptcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
__mptcp_push_pending(sk, 0);
if (flags & BIT(MPTCP_RETRANSMIT))
__mptcp_retrans(sk);
- if ((flags & BIT(MPTCP_DEQUEUE)) && __mptcp_move_skbs(sk)) {
- /* notify ack seq update */
- mptcp_cleanup_rbuf(msk, 0);
- sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
- }
cond_resched();
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
@@ -3696,8 +3738,6 @@ static int mptcp_ioctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, int *karg)
return -EINVAL;
lock_sock(sk);
- if (__mptcp_move_skbs(sk))
- mptcp_cleanup_rbuf(msk, 0);
*karg = mptcp_inq_hint(sk);
release_sock(sk);
break;
@@ -3809,6 +3849,7 @@ static struct proto mptcp_prot = {
.sendmsg = mptcp_sendmsg,
.ioctl = mptcp_ioctl,
.recvmsg = mptcp_recvmsg,
+ .backlog_rcv = mptcp_move_skb,
.release_cb = mptcp_release_cb,
.hash = mptcp_hash,
.unhash = mptcp_unhash,
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 6ac58e92a1aa3..7bfd4e0d21a8a 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -124,7 +124,6 @@
#define MPTCP_FLUSH_JOIN_LIST 5
#define MPTCP_SYNC_STATE 6
#define MPTCP_SYNC_SNDBUF 7
-#define MPTCP_DEQUEUE 8
struct mptcp_skb_cb {
u64 map_seq;
@@ -408,6 +407,7 @@ static inline int mptcp_space_from_win(const struct sock *sk, int win)
static inline int __mptcp_space(const struct sock *sk)
{
return mptcp_win_from_space(sk, READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) -
+ READ_ONCE(sk->sk_backlog.len) -
sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk));
}
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 10/12] mptcp: prevernt __mptcp_move_skbs() interfering with the fastpath
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 09/12] mptcp: leverage the sk backlog for RX packet processing Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 11/12] mptcp: borrow forward memory from subflow Paolo Abeni
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
skbs will be left waiting in the subflow only in exceptional cases,
we want to avoid messing with the fast path by unintentionally
processing in __mptcp_move_skbs() packets landed into the subflows
after the last check.
Use a separate flag to mark delayed skbs and only process subflow
with such flag set. Also add new mibs to track the exceptional events.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- rebased
---
net/mptcp/mib.c | 2 ++
net/mptcp/mib.h | 4 ++++
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 40 ++++++++++++----------------------------
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/mib.c b/net/mptcp/mib.c
index 6003e47c770a7..ac5ccf81159de 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/mib.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/mib.c
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static const struct snmp_mib mptcp_snmp_list[] = {
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("DssFallback", MPTCP_MIB_DSSFALLBACK),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("SimultConnectFallback", MPTCP_MIB_SIMULTCONNFALLBACK),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("FallbackFailed", MPTCP_MIB_FALLBACKFAILED),
+ SNMP_MIB_ITEM("RcvDelayed", MPTCP_MIB_RCVDELAYED),
+ SNMP_MIB_ITEM("DelayedProcess", MPTCP_MIB_DELAYED_PROCESS),
};
/* mptcp_mib_alloc - allocate percpu mib counters
diff --git a/net/mptcp/mib.h b/net/mptcp/mib.h
index 309bac6fea325..f6d0eaea463e5 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/mib.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/mib.h
@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ enum linux_mptcp_mib_field {
MPTCP_MIB_DSSFALLBACK, /* Bad or missing DSS */
MPTCP_MIB_SIMULTCONNFALLBACK, /* Simultaneous connect */
MPTCP_MIB_FALLBACKFAILED, /* Can't fallback due to msk status */
+ MPTCP_MIB_RCVDELAYED, /* Data move from subflow is delayed due to msk
+ * receive buffer full
+ */
+ MPTCP_MIB_DELAYED_PROCESS, /* Delayed data moved in slowpath */
__MPTCP_MIB_MAX
};
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 07326c1e6fbae..3c514b6be4eb9 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -676,13 +676,17 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
tp = tcp_sk(ssk);
do {
int mem = own_msk ? sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk) : sk->sk_backlog.len;
+ bool over_limit = mem > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf);
u32 map_remaining, offset;
u32 seq = tp->copied_seq;
struct sk_buff *skb;
bool fin;
- if (mem > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf))
+ WRITE_ONCE(subflow->data_delayed, over_limit);
+ if (subflow->data_delayed) {
+ MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVDELAYED);
break;
+ }
/* try to move as much data as available */
map_remaining = subflow->map_data_len -
@@ -2108,32 +2112,13 @@ static void mptcp_rcv_space_adjust(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int copied)
msk->rcvq_space.time = mstamp;
}
-static struct mptcp_subflow_context *
-__mptcp_first_ready_from(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
- struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow)
-{
- struct mptcp_subflow_context *start_subflow = subflow;
-
- while (!READ_ONCE(subflow->data_avail)) {
- subflow = mptcp_next_subflow(msk, subflow);
- if (subflow == start_subflow)
- return NULL;
- }
- return subflow;
-}
-
static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
bool ret = false;
- if (list_empty(&msk->conn_list))
- return false;
-
- subflow = list_first_entry(&msk->conn_list,
- struct mptcp_subflow_context, node);
- for (;;) {
+ mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
struct sock *ssk;
bool slowpath;
@@ -2144,23 +2129,22 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk)
if (sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk) > sk->sk_rcvbuf)
break;
- subflow = __mptcp_first_ready_from(msk, subflow);
- if (!subflow)
- break;
+ if (!subflow->data_delayed)
+ continue;
ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
slowpath = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
- ret = __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk, true) || ret;
+ ret |= __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk, true);
if (unlikely(ssk->sk_err))
__mptcp_error_report(sk);
unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slowpath);
-
- subflow = mptcp_next_subflow(msk, subflow);
}
__mptcp_ofo_queue(msk);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_DELAYED_PROCESS);
mptcp_check_data_fin((struct sock *)msk);
+ }
return ret;
}
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 7bfd4e0d21a8a..a295ce11774ea 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
u8 reset_transient:1;
u8 reset_reason:4;
u8 stale_count;
+ bool data_delayed;
u32 subflow_id;
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 11/12] mptcp: borrow forward memory from subflow
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 10/12] mptcp: prevernt __mptcp_move_skbs() interfering with the fastpath Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 12/12] mptcp: make fallback backlog aware Paolo Abeni
2025-09-18 20:33 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement MPTCP CI
12 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
In the MPTCP receive path, we release the subflow allocated
fwd memory just to allocate it again shortly after for the msk.
That could increases the failures chances, especially during
backlog processing, when other actions could consume the just
released memory before the msk socket has a chance to do the
rcv allocation.
Replace the skb_orphan() call with an open-coded variant that
explicitly borrows, with a PAGE_SIZE granularity, the fwd memory
from the subflow socket instead of releasing it. During backlog
processing the borrowed memory is accounted at release_cb time.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- rebased
- explain why skb_orphan is removed
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 3c514b6be4eb9..50c63c40d5bca 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -333,11 +333,12 @@ static void mptcp_data_queue_ofo(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sk_buff *skb)
mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(sk);
}
-static void mptcp_init_skb(struct sock *ssk,
- struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, int copy_len)
+static int mptcp_init_skb(struct sock *ssk,
+ struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, int copy_len)
{
const struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
bool has_rxtstamp = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->has_rxtstamp;
+ int borrowed;
/* the skb map_seq accounts for the skb offset:
* mptcp_subflow_get_mapped_dsn() is based on the current tp->copied_seq
@@ -353,6 +354,15 @@ static void mptcp_init_skb(struct sock *ssk,
skb_ext_reset(skb);
skb_dst_drop(skb);
+
+ /* "borrow" the fwd memory from the subflow, instead of reclaiming it */
+ skb->destructor = NULL;
+ skb->sk = NULL;
+ atomic_sub(skb->truesize, &ssk->sk_rmem_alloc);
+ borrowed = ssk->sk_forward_alloc - sk_unused_reserved_mem(ssk);
+ borrowed &= ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1);
+ sk_forward_alloc_add(ssk, skb->truesize - borrowed);
+ return borrowed;
}
static void __mptcp_add_backlog(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
@@ -712,14 +722,17 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
if (offset < skb->len) {
size_t len = skb->len - offset;
+ int bmem;
- mptcp_init_skb(ssk, skb, offset, len);
- skb_orphan(skb);
+ bmem = mptcp_init_skb(ssk, skb, offset, len);
- if (own_msk)
+ if (own_msk) {
+ sk_forward_alloc_add(sk, bmem);
ret |= __mptcp_move_skb(sk, skb);
- else
+ } else {
+ msk->borrowed_fwd_mem += bmem;
__mptcp_add_backlog(sk, ssk, skb);
+ }
seq += len;
if (unlikely(map_remaining < len)) {
@@ -3506,6 +3519,8 @@ static void mptcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
if (__test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_SYNC_SNDBUF, &msk->cb_flags))
__mptcp_sync_sndbuf(sk);
}
+ sk_forward_alloc_add(sk, msk->borrowed_fwd_mem);
+ msk->borrowed_fwd_mem = 0;
}
/* MP_JOIN client subflow must wait for 4th ack before sending any data:
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index a295ce11774ea..ff87dd9a0da5a 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
u32 last_data_sent;
u32 last_data_recv;
u32 last_ack_recv;
+ int borrowed_fwd_mem;
unsigned long timer_ival;
u32 token;
unsigned long flags;
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 12/12] mptcp: make fallback backlog aware
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 11/12] mptcp: borrow forward memory from subflow Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 17:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-18 20:33 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement MPTCP CI
12 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-18 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
MPTCP can't relay on ack_seq outside the msk socket log scope. With
packets pending in the backlog, such value can be quite far from the
actual dummy correct sequence map value.
Fallback dummy mapping are in sequence by definition, generate the
data seq from the subflow sequence.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index 9baf3e54e46f2..8a64a1934d784 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -491,6 +491,9 @@ static void subflow_set_remote_key(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
mptcp_crypto_key_sha(subflow->remote_key, NULL, &subflow->iasn);
subflow->iasn++;
+ /* for fallback's sake */
+ subflow->map_seq = subflow->iasn;
+
WRITE_ONCE(msk->remote_key, subflow->remote_key);
WRITE_ONCE(msk->ack_seq, subflow->iasn);
WRITE_ONCE(msk->can_ack, true);
@@ -1425,9 +1428,12 @@ static bool subflow_check_data_avail(struct sock *ssk)
skb = skb_peek(&ssk->sk_receive_queue);
subflow->map_valid = 1;
- subflow->map_seq = READ_ONCE(msk->ack_seq);
subflow->map_data_len = skb->len;
subflow->map_subflow_seq = tcp_sk(ssk)->copied_seq - subflow->ssn_offset;
+ subflow->map_seq = __mptcp_expand_seq(subflow->map_seq,
+ subflow->iasn +
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq -
+ subflow->ssn_offset - 1);
WRITE_ONCE(subflow->data_avail, true);
/* last skb in closed fallback subflow: we are at data fin */
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement
2025-09-18 17:14 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement Paolo Abeni
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-18 17:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 12/12] mptcp: make fallback backlog aware Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-18 20:33 ` MPTCP CI
2025-09-19 2:22 ` Geliang Tang
12 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2025-09-18 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: mptcp
Hi Paolo,
Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
- KVM Validation: normal: Unstable: 5 failed test(s): packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
- KVM Validation: debug: Unstable: 5 failed test(s): packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
- KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/17836736262
Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/20282b41a458
Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=1003937
If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:
$ cd [kernel source code]
$ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
--pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
auto-normal
For more details:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)
Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement
2025-09-18 20:33 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement MPTCP CI
@ 2025-09-19 2:22 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 6:54 ` Paolo Abeni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2025-09-19 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp, Paolo Abeni
Hi Paolo,
On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 20:33 +0000, MPTCP CI wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
>
> Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
>
> - KVM Validation: normal: Unstable: 5 failed test(s):
> packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect
> selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap
> selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
> - KVM Validation: debug: Unstable: 5 failed test(s):
> packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect
> selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap
> selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
> - KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
> - Task:
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/17836736262
CI reports that this series breaks the mptcp_connect.sh test:
# INFO: disconnect
# 63 ns1 MPTCP -> ns1 (10.0.1.1:20001 ) MPTCP (duration
1348ms) [ OK ]
# 64 ns1 MPTCP -> ns1 (10.0.1.1:20002 ) TCP main_loop_s:
timed out
# (duration 61185ms) [FAIL] client exit code 124, server 2
#
# netns ns1-HugJD9 (listener) socket stat for 20002:
# Netid State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
# tcp TIME-WAIT 0 0 10.0.1.1:20002 10.0.1.1:47722
timer:(timewait,,0) ino:0 sk:2066
# ^I
# TcpActiveOpens 2 0.0
# TcpPassiveOpens 2 0.0
I also tested it on my end and found that starting from patch 8 "mptcp:
cleanup fallback data fin reception", the mptcp_connect.sh test has
been failing.
I apologize for not providing this feedback during the v1 review, but I
was too busy yesterday to complete the testing.
Thanks,
-Geliang
>
> Initiator: Patchew Applier
> Commits:
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/20282b41a458
> Patchwork:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=1003937
>
>
> If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same
> environment as
> the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:
>
> $ cd [kernel source code]
> $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm
> -it \
> --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
> auto-normal
>
> For more details:
>
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
>
>
> Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done
> to have a
> stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is
> possible some
> reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not
> hesitate to
> help us improve that ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> MPTCP GH Action bot
> Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement
2025-09-19 2:22 ` Geliang Tang
@ 2025-09-19 6:54 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 7:30 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 8:14 ` Matthieu Baerts
0 siblings, 2 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-09-19 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geliang Tang, MPTCP Linux
On 9/19/25 4:22 AM, Geliang Tang wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 20:33 +0000, MPTCP CI wrote:
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
>>
>> Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
>>
>> - KVM Validation: normal: Unstable: 5 failed test(s):
>> packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect
>> selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap
>> selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
>> - KVM Validation: debug: Unstable: 5 failed test(s):
>> packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect
>> selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap
>> selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
>> - KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
>> - KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
>> - Task:
>> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/17836736262
>
> CI reports that this series breaks the mptcp_connect.sh test:
>
> # INFO: disconnect
> # 63 ns1 MPTCP -> ns1 (10.0.1.1:20001 ) MPTCP (duration
> 1348ms) [ OK ]
> # 64 ns1 MPTCP -> ns1 (10.0.1.1:20002 ) TCP main_loop_s:
> timed out
> # (duration 61185ms) [FAIL] client exit code 124, server 2
> #
> # netns ns1-HugJD9 (listener) socket stat for 20002:
> # Netid State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
> # tcp TIME-WAIT 0 0 10.0.1.1:20002 10.0.1.1:47722
> timer:(timewait,,0) ino:0 sk:2066
> # ^I
> # TcpActiveOpens 2 0.0
> # TcpPassiveOpens 2 0.0
>
> I also tested it on my end and found that starting from patch 8 "mptcp:
> cleanup fallback data fin reception", the mptcp_connect.sh test has
> been failing.
>
> I apologize for not providing this feedback during the v1 review, but I
> was too busy yesterday to complete the testing.
Thank you very much for bisecting. I did not observe the failures on v1,
but I see them on v2 (which is quite suprising, giving no big changes in
there). I submitted v2 anyway to give syzkaller/CI a chance to run more.
I think patch 1-3 should be sane and effective, we can probably merge them.
Thanks,
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement
2025-09-19 6:54 ` Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-09-19 7:30 ` Geliang Tang
2025-09-19 8:14 ` Matthieu Baerts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2025-09-19 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, MPTCP Linux
On Fri, 2025-09-19 at 08:54 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 9/19/25 4:22 AM, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 20:33 +0000, MPTCP CI wrote:
> > > Hi Paolo,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
> > >
> > > Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
> > >
> > > - KVM Validation: normal: Unstable: 5 failed test(s):
> > > packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect
> > > selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap
> > > selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
> > > - KVM Validation: debug: Unstable: 5 failed test(s):
> > > packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect
> > > selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap
> > > selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
> > > - KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
> > > - KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
> > > - Task:
> > > https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/17836736262
> >
> > CI reports that this series breaks the mptcp_connect.sh test:
> >
> > # INFO: disconnect
> > # 63 ns1 MPTCP -> ns1 (10.0.1.1:20001 ) MPTCP (duration
> > 1348ms) [ OK ]
> > # 64 ns1 MPTCP -> ns1 (10.0.1.1:20002 ) TCP main_loop_s:
> > timed out
> > # (duration 61185ms) [FAIL] client exit code 124, server 2
> > #
> > # netns ns1-HugJD9 (listener) socket stat for 20002:
> > # Netid State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer
> > Address:Port
> > # tcp TIME-WAIT 0 0 10.0.1.1:20002
> > 10.0.1.1:47722
> > timer:(timewait,,0) ino:0 sk:2066
> > # ^I
> > # TcpActiveOpens 2 0.0
> > # TcpPassiveOpens 2 0.0
> >
> > I also tested it on my end and found that starting from patch 8
> > "mptcp:
> > cleanup fallback data fin reception", the mptcp_connect.sh test has
> > been failing.
> >
> > I apologize for not providing this feedback during the v1 review,
> > but I
> > was too busy yesterday to complete the testing.
>
> Thank you very much for bisecting. I did not observe the failures on
> v1,
> but I see them on v2 (which is quite suprising, giving no big changes
> in
> there). I submitted v2 anyway to give syzkaller/CI a chance to run
> more.
>
> I think patch 1-3 should be sane and effective, we can probably merge
> them.
Yes, indeed. I think patch 5 and patch 7 can be merged too. I have just
applied these 5 patches (1-3, 5, 7) to my tree and started testing.
Once all the tests pass, I will add my Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags
for them today.
Thanks,
-Geliang
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement
2025-09-19 6:54 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-09-19 7:30 ` Geliang Tang
@ 2025-09-19 8:14 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-19 13:11 ` Matthieu Baerts
1 sibling, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2025-09-19 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, Geliang Tang, MPTCP Linux
Hi Paolo,
On 19/09/2025 08:54, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 9/19/25 4:22 AM, Geliang Tang wrote:
>> On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 20:33 +0000, MPTCP CI wrote:
>>> Hi Paolo,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
>>>
>>> Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
>>>
>>> - KVM Validation: normal: Unstable: 5 failed test(s):
>>> packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect
>>> selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap
>>> selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
>>> - KVM Validation: debug: Unstable: 5 failed test(s):
>>> packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect
>>> selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap
>>> selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
>>> - KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
>>> - KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
>>> - Task:
>>> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/17836736262
>>
>> CI reports that this series breaks the mptcp_connect.sh test:
>>
>> # INFO: disconnect
>> # 63 ns1 MPTCP -> ns1 (10.0.1.1:20001 ) MPTCP (duration
>> 1348ms) [ OK ]
>> # 64 ns1 MPTCP -> ns1 (10.0.1.1:20002 ) TCP main_loop_s:
>> timed out
>> # (duration 61185ms) [FAIL] client exit code 124, server 2
>> #
>> # netns ns1-HugJD9 (listener) socket stat for 20002:
>> # Netid State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
>> # tcp TIME-WAIT 0 0 10.0.1.1:20002 10.0.1.1:47722
>> timer:(timewait,,0) ino:0 sk:2066
>> # ^I
>> # TcpActiveOpens 2 0.0
>> # TcpPassiveOpens 2 0.0
>>
>> I also tested it on my end and found that starting from patch 8 "mptcp:
>> cleanup fallback data fin reception", the mptcp_connect.sh test has
>> been failing.
>>
>> I apologize for not providing this feedback during the v1 review, but I
>> was too busy yesterday to complete the testing.
>
> Thank you very much for bisecting. I did not observe the failures on v1,
> but I see them on v2 (which is quite suprising, giving no big changes in
> there). I submitted v2 anyway to give syzkaller/CI a chance to run more.
It looks like the CI had the same issues with the v1:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/17795536153
> I think patch 1-3 should be sane and effective, we can probably merge them.
Thank you for that!
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 00/12] mptcp: receive path improvement
2025-09-19 8:14 ` Matthieu Baerts
@ 2025-09-19 13:11 ` Matthieu Baerts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2025-09-19 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: Geliang Tang, MPTCP Linux
On 19/09/2025 10:14, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On 19/09/2025 08:54, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> On 9/19/25 4:22 AM, Geliang Tang wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 20:33 +0000, MPTCP CI wrote:
>>>> Hi Paolo,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
>>>>
>>>> Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
>>>>
>>>> - KVM Validation: normal: Unstable: 5 failed test(s):
>>>> packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect
>>>> selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap
>>>> selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
>>>> - KVM Validation: debug: Unstable: 5 failed test(s):
>>>> packetdrill_mp_capable selftest_mptcp_connect
>>>> selftest_mptcp_connect_checksum selftest_mptcp_connect_mmap
>>>> selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile 🔴
>>>> - KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
>>>> - KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
>>>> - Task:
>>>> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/17836736262
>>>
>>> CI reports that this series breaks the mptcp_connect.sh test:
>>>
>>> # INFO: disconnect
>>> # 63 ns1 MPTCP -> ns1 (10.0.1.1:20001 ) MPTCP (duration
>>> 1348ms) [ OK ]
>>> # 64 ns1 MPTCP -> ns1 (10.0.1.1:20002 ) TCP main_loop_s:
>>> timed out
>>> # (duration 61185ms) [FAIL] client exit code 124, server 2
>>> #
>>> # netns ns1-HugJD9 (listener) socket stat for 20002:
>>> # Netid State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
>>> # tcp TIME-WAIT 0 0 10.0.1.1:20002 10.0.1.1:47722
>>> timer:(timewait,,0) ino:0 sk:2066
>>> # ^I
>>> # TcpActiveOpens 2 0.0
>>> # TcpPassiveOpens 2 0.0
>>>
>>> I also tested it on my end and found that starting from patch 8 "mptcp:
>>> cleanup fallback data fin reception", the mptcp_connect.sh test has
>>> been failing.
>>>
>>> I apologize for not providing this feedback during the v1 review, but I
>>> was too busy yesterday to complete the testing.
>>
>> Thank you very much for bisecting. I did not observe the failures on v1,
>> but I see them on v2 (which is quite suprising, giving no big changes in
>> there). I submitted v2 anyway to give syzkaller/CI a chance to run more.
>
> It looks like the CI had the same issues with the v1:
>
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/17795536153
Note that these issues were probably not visible on your side when you
developed the v1, with an older base. For mptcp_connect*.sh, it looks
like they are failing in the 'disconnect' part, due to a recent
modification in the selftests:
https://lore.kernel.org/20250912-net-mptcp-fix-sft-connect-v1-3-d40e77cbbf02@kernel.org
Now the TCP connections are listed, and one stays open. The packetdrill
failure looks strange: a RST is sent in reply to a FIN+ACK.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread