All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LARTC] quantum vs. r2q ?
@ 2003-05-01  7:17 openings
  2003-05-01  9:20 ` Stef Coene
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: openings @ 2003-05-01  7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Thanks for your answer. stef.

My exmaple is not suitable. 

but, On 100Mbit Ethernet Network environment.

Some class's rate can be 1Mbps.

The other class's rate can be 30Mbps

In this situation, when r2q\x10, automatic set quantum value = 12500 (1Mbps class)  
                                               automatic set quantum value = 375000(30Mbps class) => too big!

                        when r2q\x100, automatic set quantum value = 1250 (1Mbps class)=> too small!
                                                automatic set quantum value = 37500 (30Mbps class) 

                        when r2q P, automatic set quantum value = 2500 (1Mbps class)
                                                automatic set quantum value = 75000 (30Mbps class)=> too big!

Searching of r2q value is too difficult. 

In above situation, 
I select r2q = 50, and when I create 30Mbps class, I use quantum0000 option.
Is this right?
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿË\x01\x14™¨¥Šx%ŠË\x7f,\x04S\vùšŠYšŸ÷lõ¯ç–^[m§ÿÿ™¨¥™©ÿvÏZþy\x7f™¨¥™©ÿ–+-ŠwèþV«µÁÎY3ÿ†Ûiÿÿåj»\þŠà

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-01  9:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-01  7:17 [LARTC] quantum vs. r2q ? openings
2003-05-01  9:20 ` Stef Coene

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.