* [LARTC] quantum vs. r2q ?
@ 2003-05-01 7:17 openings
2003-05-01 9:20 ` Stef Coene
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: openings @ 2003-05-01 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Thanks for your answer. stef.
My exmaple is not suitable.
but, On 100Mbit Ethernet Network environment.
Some class's rate can be 1Mbps.
The other class's rate can be 30Mbps
In this situation, when r2q\x10, automatic set quantum value = 12500 (1Mbps class)
automatic set quantum value = 375000(30Mbps class) => too big!
when r2q\x100, automatic set quantum value = 1250 (1Mbps class)=> too small!
automatic set quantum value = 37500 (30Mbps class)
when r2q P, automatic set quantum value = 2500 (1Mbps class)
automatic set quantum value = 75000 (30Mbps class)=> too big!
Searching of r2q value is too difficult.
In above situation,
I select r2q = 50, and when I create 30Mbps class, I use quantum0000 option.
Is this right?
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿË\x01\x14™¨¥Šx%ŠË\x7f,\x04S\vùšŠYšŸ÷lõ¯ç–^[m§ÿÿ™¨¥™©ÿvÏZþy\x7f™¨¥™©ÿ–+-ŠwèþV«µÁÎY3ÿ†Ûiÿÿåj»\þŠà
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] quantum vs. r2q ?
2003-05-01 7:17 [LARTC] quantum vs. r2q ? openings
@ 2003-05-01 9:20 ` Stef Coene
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-05-01 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Thursday 01 May 2003 09:17, openings wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. stef.
>
> My exmaple is not suitable.
>
> but, On 100Mbit Ethernet Network environment.
>
> Some class's rate can be 1Mbps.
>
> The other class's rate can be 30Mbps
>
> In this situation, when r2q\x10, automatic set quantum value = 12500 (1Mbps
> class) automatic set quantum value = 375000(30Mbps class) => too big!
>
> when r2q\x100, automatic set quantum value = 1250
> (1Mbps class)=> too small! automatic set quantum value = 37500 (30Mbps
> class)
>
> when r2q P, automatic set quantum value = 2500
> (1Mbps class) automatic set quantum value = 75000 (30Mbps class)=> too
> big!
>
> Searching of r2q value is too difficult.
>
> In above situation,
> I select r2q = 50, and when I create 30Mbps class, I use quantum0000
> option. Is this right?
Yes. But don't worry about a wrong quantum. It's only used when 2 classes
are asking for more bandwidth then the rate.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-01 9:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-01 7:17 [LARTC] quantum vs. r2q ? openings
2003-05-01 9:20 ` Stef Coene
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.