All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"Ext4 Developers List" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/27] ext4: expand KUnit tests in fs/ext4/extents-test.c for file range operations
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 04:34:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-210364@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112040638.1576836-24-tytso@mit.edu>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] ext4: uninitialized invalidate_lock in ext_init_mock_inode()
- [Low] ext4: use-after-free of sb->s_bdev after deactivate_super() in
  extents_kunit_exit()
- [Low] ext4: i_data_sem and path leak on assertion abort in
  ext_expect_extent_at()
--

commit 0bbdba01f4f2a820793844a83a44fb01144fcc50
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ext4: expand KUnit tests in fs/ext4/extents-test.c for file range operations

This commit expands the ext4 extents KUnit test suite to cover
ext4_fallocate(), ext4_zero_range(), ext4_collapse_range(),
ext4_insert_range(), unwritten extent conversion helpers, ext4_fiemap(),
and ext4_get_es_cache().

> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents-test.c b/fs/ext4/extents-test.c
> index 7565a8aa4e106..4f1746be323ff 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents-test.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents-test.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -200,20 +210,29 @@ static void ext_init_mock_inode(struct ext4_inode_info *ei,
>  	inode->i_sb = sb;
>  	inode->i_ino = ino;
>  	inode->i_mode = S_IFREG | 0644;
> +	set_nlink(inode, 1);
>  	inode->i_blkbits = sb->s_blocksize_bits;
> -	inode->i_flags |= S_NOQUOTA;
> +	inode->i_flags |= S_NOQUOTA | S_NOSEC;
>  	inode->i_mapping = &inode->i_data;
> +	inode_set_iversion(inode, 1);
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&inode->i_lock);
>  	init_rwsem(&inode->i_rwsem);
> -	init_rwsem(&inode->i_data.invalidate_lock);
> +	address_space_init_once(&inode->i_data);
> +	inode->i_data.host = inode;
>  	inode_state_set_raw(inode, I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC);

[Severity: Medium]
Does replacing init_rwsem(&inode->i_data.invalidate_lock) with
address_space_init_once(&inode->i_data) leave invalidate_lock
uninitialized?

address_space_init_once() zeroes inode->i_data and initializes only
i_pages, i_mmap_rwsem, i_private_lock, and i_mmap; in the VFS,
invalidate_lock is initialized separately in inode_init_always_gfp().
When the new fallocate tests call ext4_fallocate() with punch hole, zero
range, collapse range, or insert range, filemap_invalidate_lock() acquires
this zeroed rw_semaphore, which triggers lockdep or CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS
warnings and deadlocks on CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT kernels.  Keeping
init_rwsem(&inode->i_data.invalidate_lock) after address_space_init_once()
avoids this.

[ ... ]

> @@ -267,6 +286,7 @@ static void extents_kunit_exit(struct kunit *test)
>  
>  	kfree(k_ctx.meta_blocks);
>  	kfree(sbi->s_es);
> +	kfree(sb->s_bdev->bd_queue);
>  	kfree(sb->s_bdev->bd_mapping);
>  	kfree(sb->s_bdev);
>  	kfree(sbi);

[Severity: Low]
Can dereferencing sb->s_bdev here use sb after it has been freed?

deactivate_super(sb) is called just above this hunk, which drops the final
reference on sb and schedules its destruction via RCU and
destroy_super_work(), unlike the error path in extents_kunit_init() which
frees sb->s_bdev->bd_queue, sb->s_bdev->bd_mapping, and sb->s_bdev before
deactivating the superblock.

[ ... ]

> +static void ext_expect_extent_at(struct kunit *test, struct inode *inode,
> +				 ext4_lblk_t lblk, unsigned short exp_len,
> +				 ext4_fsblk_t exp_pblk, bool exp_unwritten)
> +{
> +	struct ext4_ext_path *path;
> +	struct ext4_extent *ex;
> +
> +	down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> +	path = ext4_find_extent(inode, lblk, NULL, EXT4_EX_NOCACHE);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(path));
> +	ex = path[path->p_depth].p_ext;
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ex);
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block), lblk);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ex), exp_len);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ext4_ext_pblock(ex), exp_pblk);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, !!ext4_ext_is_unwritten(ex), exp_unwritten);
> +
> +	ext4_free_ext_path(path);
> +	up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> +}

[Severity: Low]
If KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE() or KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL() fails in
ext_expect_extent_at(), does the test abort with EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem
still held for read and path leaked?

Because KUNIT_ASSERT_* immediately terminates the test kthread,
extents_kunit_exit() -> ext_cleanup_inode() will then deadlock on
down_write(&ei->i_data_sem).

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112040638.1576836-1-tytso@mit.edu?part=23

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-12  4:06 [PATCH 00/27] ext4: add lots of KUnit tests! Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 01/27] ext4: add KUinit tests for fs/ext4/extents_status.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 02/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/extents.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 03/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for ext4_ext_split() leaf and index splitting Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 04/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/xattr.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 05/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/namei.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 06/27] ext4: expand KUnit tests for fs/ext4/mballoc.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 07/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/inline.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 08/27] ext4: zero s_fc_replay_state in ext4_fc_replay_cleanup() Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 09/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/fast_commit.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 10/27] ext4: expand KUnit tests for fs/ext4/inode.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 11/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/ialloc.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 12/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/balloc.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 13/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/orphan.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 14/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/block_validity.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 15/27] ext4: check multi-block overlap on left traversal in add_system_zone() Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 16/27] ext4: enable full feature coverage in fs/ext4/.kunitconfig Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 17/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/super.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 18/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/sysfs.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 19/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/ioctl.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 20/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/resize.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 21/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/migrate.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 22/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/indirect.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 23/27] ext4: expand KUnit tests in fs/ext4/extents-test.c for file range operations Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:34   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 24/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/fsmap.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 25/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/move_extent.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 26/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/mmp.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  4:06 ` [PATCH 27/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/dir.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12  4:41   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-210364@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.