From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Ext4 Developers List" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/indirect.c
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 04:46:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-210391@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112040638.1576836-23-tytso@mit.edu>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] ext4: indirect-test: UAF in ind_test_free_inode() after RCU
grace period
- [Low] ext4: uncleaned percpu_counter and uninited work/timer in
ind_test_init()
It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
introduce:
- [Critical] ext4: incomplete error check in ext4_ind_map_blocks() [1]
--
commit ebeb5ffec6cf1b1539b939ab7329a1923d9ae24c
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/indirect.c
This commit adds the ext4_indirect_test KUnit test suite for indirect block
mapping, truncation, and hole punching, and routes indirect block buffer
lookups through ext4_sb_getblk().
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/indirect-test.c b/fs/ext4/indirect-test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..add5662adc3ba
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/ext4/indirect-test.c
[ ... ]
> +static void ind_test_free_inode(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, 0, EXT_MAX_BLOCKS);
> + kfree(EXT4_I(inode));
> +}
> +
> +static void ind_test_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + truncate_inode_pages_final(&inode->i_data);
> + clear_inode(inode);
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
Can ind_test_free_inode() trigger a use-after-free on ctx->sbi after the
test finishes?
At the end of each test, iput() runs ind_test_evict_inode() synchronously
and queues i_callback() -> ind_test_free_inode() via call_rcu(). KUnit
then runs ind_test_cleanup() without an rcu_barrier() and frees ctx, so
when the RCU callback later runs ext4_es_remove_extent(), it dereferences
EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb) inside the freed ctx.
Moving ext4_es_remove_extent() into ind_test_evict_inode() and calling
rcu_barrier() in ind_test_cleanup() before deactivating sb would avoid
this.
[ ... ]
> +static void ind_test_cleanup(struct ind_test_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + struct super_block *sb = ctx->sb;
> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = &ctx->sbi;
> + struct ind_mock_blk *blk, *tmp;
> +
> + if (sb) {
> + cancel_work_sync(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work);
> + timer_delete_sync(&sbi->s_err_report);
> + }
> +
> + if (ctx->es_shrinker_inited) {
> + ext4_es_unregister_shrinker(sbi);
> + ctx->es_shrinker_inited = false;
> + }
> +
> + if (ctx->counters_inited) {
> + percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter);
> + percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_dirtyclusters_counter);
> + percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
> + ctx->counters_inited = false;
> + }
[ ... ]
> + ctx->sb = sb;
> + up_write(&sb->s_umount);
> +
> + ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, ind_test_cleanup_action, ctx);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
[ ... ]
> + INIT_WORK(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work, ind_test_sb_upd_work);
> + timer_setup(&sbi->s_err_report, ind_test_err_timer, 0);
[ ... ]
> + ret = percpu_counter_init(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter, 4096,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + ret = percpu_counter_init(&sbi->s_dirtyclusters_counter, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + ret = percpu_counter_init(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter, 200, GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + ctx->counters_inited = true;
[Severity: Low]
If the second or third percpu_counter_init() fails, does KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ()
abort while ctx->counters_inited is still false? ind_test_cleanup() then
skips percpu_counter_destroy(), leaking the earlier counter and leaving it
linked in the global percpu_counters list when ctx is freed.
Also, ctx->sb is set before kunit_add_action_or_reset(), whereas
s_sb_upd_work and s_err_report are initialized later, so if
kunit_add_action_or_reset() fails, ind_test_cleanup() calls
cancel_work_sync() and timer_delete_sync() on uninitialized structures.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/indirect.c b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
> index 5aec759eed705..5b2b2be73a90a 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/indirect.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static Indirect *ext4_get_branch(struct inode *inode, int depth,
> ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> goto failure;
> }
> - bh = sb_getblk(sb, key);
> + bh = ext4_sb_getblk(sb, key);
> if (unlikely(!bh)) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto failure;
[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but when ext4_get_branch()
fails with -EFSCORRUPTED or -ENOMEM [1], doesn't
ext4_ind_map_blocks() miss the error when EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE is set?
fs/ext4/indirect.c:ext4_ind_map_blocks() {
...
/* Failed read of indirect block */
if (err == -EIO)
goto cleanup;
...
}
Because ext4_ind_map_blocks() only checks for err == -EIO, it treats the
partial chain returned on -ENOMEM or -EFSCORRUPTED as a hole, allocates new
blocks, and splices them over the existing indirect block pointer,
orphaning the original subtree and corrupting the file.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-2bfbc9ba-6121-45d3-a664-11e7452ad5d6
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112040638.1576836-1-tytso@mit.edu?part=22
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 4:06 [PATCH 00/27] ext4: add lots of KUnit tests! Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 01/27] ext4: add KUinit tests for fs/ext4/extents_status.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 02/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/extents.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 03/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for ext4_ext_split() leaf and index splitting Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 04/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/xattr.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 05/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/namei.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 06/27] ext4: expand KUnit tests for fs/ext4/mballoc.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 07/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/inline.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 08/27] ext4: zero s_fc_replay_state in ext4_fc_replay_cleanup() Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 09/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/fast_commit.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 10/27] ext4: expand KUnit tests for fs/ext4/inode.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 11/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/ialloc.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 12/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/balloc.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 13/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/orphan.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 14/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/block_validity.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 15/27] ext4: check multi-block overlap on left traversal in add_system_zone() Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 16/27] ext4: enable full feature coverage in fs/ext4/.kunitconfig Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 17/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/super.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 18/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/sysfs.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 19/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/ioctl.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 20/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/resize.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 21/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/migrate.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 22/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/indirect.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 23/27] ext4: expand KUnit tests in fs/ext4/extents-test.c for file range operations Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 24/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/fsmap.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 25/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/move_extent.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 26/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/mmp.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:06 ` [PATCH 27/27] ext4: add KUnit tests for fs/ext4/dir.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-11-12 4:41 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-210391@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.