From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:21:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150819192157.GC13372@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150819210830.6c52ebed@free-electrons.com>
Thomas, All,
On 2015-08-19 21:08 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:05:34 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
[--SNIP--]
> > Now, there are two questions:
> >
> > - will we need to _check_ for any arbitrary kernel option to be set,
> > and offer packages a simple mean to do so?
> >
> > - will we need to _force_ (on or off) any other kernel option, and
> > offer packages a simple mean to do so?
>
> We already do your second item.
No, we are not allowing any random package to set kernel options.
We do have infra for packages to tweak their *own* options, not those
of other packages (and history has proved it was not doable, I should
know, I tried and failed miserably with the lzo stuff).
> In general, I'd like to keep the handling of the kernel configuration
> to be as minimal as possible. Otherwise, we'll quickly enter a
> situation where we need to enable different kernel options depending on
> the kernel version. It can quickly become a real nightmare. Buildroot
> has always been about the user knowing what (s)he is doing, including
> in terms of making sure that the kernel configuration matches what is
> done in userspace.
I do fully agree with you on this position. Tweaking the kernel options
is a real hornet's nest...
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-19 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-17 16:50 [Buildroot] xtables-addons does not build for arm kernel 4.1.4 Jan Viktorin
2015-08-17 21:52 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-08-17 22:35 ` Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 13:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 13:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 1/2] pkg-utils: Define KCONFIG_ASSERT_OPT macro Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 19:16 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-19 13:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 2/2] xtables-addons: test CONFIG_MODULES=y in the kernel Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 17:46 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 19:05 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-19 19:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 19:21 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2015-08-19 20:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 21:05 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-08-21 13:22 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-21 13:41 ` Jeremy Rosen
2015-08-21 20:28 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-08-21 21:05 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-21 22:17 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150819192157.GC13372@free.fr \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox