From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:46:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150819194643.1fad6062@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439990076-10412-1-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com>
Dear Jan Viktorin,
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:14:34 +0200, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> this short patch series introduces a way how to check whether certain
> CONFIG_* entries are set to an expected value in a selected .config
> file. When building a package that requires a certain CONFIG_* to be
> set (as in the case of xtables-addons), Buildroot can either force
> to set the config or just error out a message.
>
> I could not find any suitable mechanism for this in Buildroot (if there
> is one, please give me a reference) so I propose a simple extension of
> KCONFIG_*_OPT util macros. It is then implemented for xtables-addons to
> check whether CONFIG_MODULES are set in the Linux Kernel .config.
There is some discussion already going on on this topic, around the
pkg-kernel-module infrastructure. We recently committed a patch that
makes the infrastructure verify that the kernel has been built with
module support, and if not, bail out with a clear error message:
http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=8df95d926e963601c727defeb4ab90ce2368da70
However, Peter Korsgaard raised the concern that we should instead just
forcefully enable CONFIG_MODULES=y in the configuration in such a case.
There has then been some discussion with Yann on how to achieve that
properly. Please see the thread at
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2015-August/137511.html.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-19 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-17 16:50 [Buildroot] xtables-addons does not build for arm kernel 4.1.4 Jan Viktorin
2015-08-17 21:52 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-08-17 22:35 ` Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 13:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 13:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 1/2] pkg-utils: Define KCONFIG_ASSERT_OPT macro Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 19:16 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-19 13:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 2/2] xtables-addons: test CONFIG_MODULES=y in the kernel Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 17:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-08-19 19:05 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-19 19:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 19:21 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-19 20:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 21:05 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-08-21 13:22 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-21 13:41 ` Jeremy Rosen
2015-08-21 20:28 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-08-21 21:05 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-21 22:17 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150819194643.1fad6062@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox