Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 22:28:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877foo75em.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150821132227.GA3753@free.fr> (Yann E. MORIN's message of "Fri,  21 Aug 2015 15:22:27 +0200")

>>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> writes:

Hi,

 >> > I think the plan I'll be goign with is to add a hidden Kconfig knob that
 >> > packages that want to build a kernel module will have to select.
 >> 
 >> Why not just like the kernel-module infrastructure handle it like I
 >> proposed? I don't think it is very nice that people have to remember to
 >> add the select as well (and chances are they won't notice if they
 >> forget).

 > Because that would not work for packages in br2-external trees, as I
 > already explained.

Are you sure? I didn't try it, but as we only *USE* the variable when
LINUX_KCONFIG_FIXUP_CMDS runs, which is after all the .mk files have
been parsed I think it should work?


> I know you are not using br2-external (and also do not really see the
 > point of it), but a lot of people find this to be a really important
 > feature. I also suspect some of our (corporate) users did choose
 > Buildroot (partly) because of br2-external.

It's true that I don't personally use br2-external and don't find it
such a killer feature, I *DO* acknowledge that some people do (which is
why I merged the support for it in the first place) and will try to keep
it working as good as possible. With that said, we have a lot of other
requirements for Buildroot (like keeping it simple), so will not bend
over backwards to improve br2-external support if it means making big
compromises elsewhere.

br2-external stuff will always been more limited than normal packages in
the tree.


 >> Like Thomas says, we are already doing the 2nd option and I think it
 >> makes sense to keep on doing so - So I don't think there's a common need
 >> for the first.

 > Still, we are currently not allowing another package to set kernel
 > options _from_ that package's .mk file. All we have is the kernel
 > (de)activating options based on the presence of other packages, and that
 > excludes packages from br2-external. Unless Buildroot is modified
 > accordingly (but then br2-external looses its attractiveness for that
 > package).

Ok, but if all of these use the kernel-module infrastructure (which
linux.mk knows about), then this should work for CONFIG_MODULES, right?
It naturally cannot work for random other config settings.

-- 
Venlig hilsen,
Peter Korsgaard 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-21 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-17 16:50 [Buildroot] xtables-addons does not build for arm kernel 4.1.4 Jan Viktorin
2015-08-17 21:52 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-08-17 22:35   ` Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 13:14   ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 13:14     ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 1/2] pkg-utils: Define KCONFIG_ASSERT_OPT macro Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 19:16       ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-19 13:14     ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 2/2] xtables-addons: test CONFIG_MODULES=y in the kernel Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 17:46     ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 19:05       ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-19 19:08         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 19:21           ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-19 20:23             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 21:05         ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-08-21 13:22           ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-21 13:41             ` Jeremy Rosen
2015-08-21 20:28             ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2015-08-21 21:05               ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-21 22:17                 ` Peter Korsgaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877foo75em.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
    --to=peter@korsgaard.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox