Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:08:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150819210830.6c52ebed@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150819190534.GA13372@free.fr>

Dear Yann E. MORIN,

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:05:34 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:

> I think the plan I'll be goign with is to add a hidden Kconfig knob that
> packages that want to build a kernel module will have to select.
> 
> Then, if that option is set, we can force-on support for modules in
> linux.mk. Note: if the option is not set, we would *not* disable support
> for modules, and let it as set in the user-provided (def)config file.
> 
> So, all in all, that would solve the xtables-addons issue, because we
> would be handling CONFIG_MODULE explicitly.

Sounds good to me.

> Now, there are two questions:
> 
>   - will we need to _check_ for any arbitrary kernel option to be set,
>     and offer packages a simple mean to do so?
> 
>   - will we need to _force_ (on or off) any other kernel option, and
>     offer packages a simple mean to do so?

We already do your second item.

In general, I'd like to keep the handling of the kernel configuration
to be as minimal as possible. Otherwise, we'll quickly enter a
situation where we need to enable different kernel options depending on
the kernel version. It can quickly become a real nightmare. Buildroot
has always been about the user knowing what (s)he is doing, including
in terms of making sure that the kernel configuration matches what is
done in userspace.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-19 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-17 16:50 [Buildroot] xtables-addons does not build for arm kernel 4.1.4 Jan Viktorin
2015-08-17 21:52 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-08-17 22:35   ` Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 13:14   ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 13:14     ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 1/2] pkg-utils: Define KCONFIG_ASSERT_OPT macro Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 19:16       ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-19 13:14     ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 2/2] xtables-addons: test CONFIG_MODULES=y in the kernel Jan Viktorin
2015-08-19 17:46     ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 0/2] Checking whether a certain CONFIG_* is set Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 19:05       ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-19 19:08         ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-08-19 19:21           ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-19 20:23             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 21:05         ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-08-21 13:22           ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-21 13:41             ` Jeremy Rosen
2015-08-21 20:28             ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-08-21 21:05               ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-21 22:17                 ` Peter Korsgaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150819210830.6c52ebed@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox