* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers @ 2015-09-07 12:36 Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-07 19:38 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-07 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hi, I am new to buildroot & looking forward to try my hands on creating :--: linux Kernel Rfile system Uboot For embedded system. I want to know from your experience which board shall i go for :-- Raspberrypi b version AT91SAM9260 What i think as something is already existing in buildroot & linux kernel for support of these two boards, so its good for freshers to learn all these process on these boards. Means 32 bit controller whose specs are clearly define so that one can try hand on creating/configuring memory drivers for sdram or Nand , creating device drivers , configuring uboot & architecture specific files, porting linux & rfsystem & uboot made by yourself ? Regards, Katoch -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20150907/f500b8a5/attachment.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-07 12:36 [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-07 19:38 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 2015-09-08 2:13 ` Dinesh Guleria 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2015-09-07 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot On 07-09-15 14:36, Dinesh Guleria wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to buildroot & looking forward to try my hands on creating :--: > linux Kernel > Rfile system > Uboot > > For embedded system. > > I want to know from your experience which board shall i go for :-- > Raspberrypi b version Problem with Raspberry Pi is that it's rather difficult to understand the SoC, and its software support is pretty unusual (i.e., far from upstream). > AT91SAM9260 That's a SoC, not a board. There are a bunch of devboards with the processor, but can you still get them? Probably the at91sam9g45m10ek or atmel_sama5d3_xplained are a better fit. The MIPS creator CI20 is also nice. But that's not ARM, of course. > What i think as something is already existing in buildroot & linux kernel for > support of these two boards, so its good for freshers to learn all these process > on these boards. > > Means 32 bit controller whose specs are clearly define so that one can try hand > on creating/configuring memory drivers for sdram or Nand , creating device > drivers , configuring uboot & architecture specific files, porting linux & > rfsystem & uboot made by yourself ? These things are _not_ something I would advise for an absolute beginner. Experienced consultants like me plan two to four weeks of full-time work for porting everything from a devboard to a custom board. So starting from scratch is definitely an ambitious goal. Start out with just building and installing the boot loader, kernel and rootfs for which support already exists. Then maybe you can bump the U-Boot and kernel version (and contribute patches, of course). Anyway, any devboard you can get probably already has U-Boot and kernel support, otherwise they wouldn't be able to sell it. So unless you're developing a custom board, re-implementing those from scratch is just duplicate work. Regards, Arnout > > Regards, > Katoch > > > > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot at busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot > -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-07 19:38 ` Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2015-09-08 2:13 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-08 7:17 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-08 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Thanks Arnout, for your reply. This one is quiet expensive :-- http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-38394/l/evaluation-kit-for-at91sam9g45 It seems to be good bet for beginners as it is low cost, what do you say ? http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-65651?CMP=KNC-PS-G-APAC-GEN-MAN Does it comes with uboot installed ? Does this buildroot support SAMA5D3 & board in above link ? http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot Please suggest. Regards, Dinesh On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote: > On 07-09-15 14:36, Dinesh Guleria wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am new to buildroot & looking forward to try my hands on creating :--: > > linux Kernel > > Rfile system > > Uboot > > > > For embedded system. > > > > I want to know from your experience which board shall i go for :-- > > Raspberrypi b version > > Problem with Raspberry Pi is that it's rather difficult to understand the > SoC, > and its software support is pretty unusual (i.e., far from upstream). > > > AT91SAM9260 > > That's a SoC, not a board. There are a bunch of devboards with the > processor, > but can you still get them? Probably the at91sam9g45m10ek or > atmel_sama5d3_xplained are a better fit. > > The MIPS creator CI20 is also nice. But that's not ARM, of course. > > > What i think as something is already existing in buildroot & linux > kernel for > > support of these two boards, so its good for freshers to learn all these > process > > on these boards. > > > > Means 32 bit controller whose specs are clearly define so that one can > try hand > > on creating/configuring memory drivers for sdram or Nand , creating > device > > drivers , configuring uboot & architecture specific files, porting linux > & > > rfsystem & uboot made by yourself ? > > These things are _not_ something I would advise for an absolute beginner. > Experienced consultants like me plan two to four weeks of full-time work > for > porting everything from a devboard to a custom board. So starting from > scratch > is definitely an ambitious goal. > > Start out with just building and installing the boot loader, kernel and > rootfs > for which support already exists. Then maybe you can bump the U-Boot and > kernel > version (and contribute patches, of course). > > Anyway, any devboard you can get probably already has U-Boot and kernel > support, otherwise they wouldn't be able to sell it. So unless you're > developing > a custom board, re-implementing those from scratch is just duplicate work. > > Regards, > Arnout > > > > > Regards, > > Katoch > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > buildroot mailing list > > buildroot at busybox.net > > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot > > > > > -- > Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be > Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 > Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be > G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven > LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle > GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20150908/f0718fc4/attachment.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-08 2:13 ` Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-08 7:17 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 2015-09-08 8:56 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-08 10:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2015-09-08 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hi Dinesh, [Please don't top-post] On 08-09-15 04:13, Dinesh Guleria wrote: > Thanks Arnout, for your reply. > > This one is quiet expensive :-- > http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-38394/l/evaluation-kit-for-at91sam9g45 Ah yes I forgot that - I got mine for free :-) Check out the linuxgizmos article [1] for a nice overview of low-cost boards. Some of them have a buildroot defconfig. If you take one which doesn't, you can develop it yourself and contribute :-) > It seems to be good bet for beginners as it is low cost, what do you say ? > http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-65651?CMP=KNC-PS-G-APAC-GEN-MAN That's the atmel_sama5d3_xplained I mentioned. Wow, it is still relatively expensive... > Does it comes with uboot installed ? I have no idea, but it is fully supported by Buildroot, both for booting from SD card and booting from flash. > Does this buildroot support SAMA5D3 & board in above link ? Yes. > http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot Well, the linux4sam fork is relatively old. In addition, there are some changes in it that are incorrect. So I'd stick to upstream buildroot :-) Regards, Arnout [1] http://linuxgizmos.com/ringing-in-2015-with-40-linux-friendly-hacker-sbcs/ > > Please suggest. > > Regards, > Dinesh > [snip] -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-08 7:17 ` Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2015-09-08 8:56 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-08 10:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2015-09-08 16:16 ` Luca Ceresoli 2015-09-08 10:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni 1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-08 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot So i will go for atmel_sama5d3_xplained . http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-38394/l/evaluation-kit-for-at91sam9g45 >> I have no idea, but it is fully supported by Buildroot, both for booting from SD card and booting from flash. With seggers j- link can i flash uboot to the Nand flash of this board ? Regards, Katoch On 8 Sep 2015 12:48, "Arnout Vandecappelle" <arnout@mind.be> wrote: > Hi Dinesh, > > [Please don't top-post] > > On 08-09-15 04:13, Dinesh Guleria wrote: > > Thanks Arnout, for your reply. > > > > This one is quiet expensive :-- > > > http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-38394/l/evaluation-kit-for-at91sam9g45 > > Ah yes I forgot that - I got mine for free :-) > > Check out the linuxgizmos article [1] for a nice overview of low-cost > boards. > Some of them have a buildroot defconfig. If you take one which doesn't, > you can > develop it yourself and contribute :-) > > > > It seems to be good bet for beginners as it is low cost, what do you > say ? > > > http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-65651?CMP=KNC-PS-G-APAC-GEN-MAN > > That's the atmel_sama5d3_xplained I mentioned. Wow, it is still relatively > expensive... > > > Does it comes with uboot installed ? > > I have no idea, but it is fully supported by Buildroot, both for booting > from > SD card and booting from flash. > > > > Does this buildroot support SAMA5D3 & board in above link ? > > Yes. > > > > http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot > > Well, the linux4sam fork is relatively old. In addition, there are some > changes > in it that are incorrect. So I'd stick to upstream buildroot :-) > > > Regards, > Arnout > > [1] > http://linuxgizmos.com/ringing-in-2015-with-40-linux-friendly-hacker-sbcs/ > > > > > Please suggest. > > > > Regards, > > Dinesh > > > [snip] > > > -- > Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be > Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 > Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be > G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven > LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle > GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20150908/c20f5629/attachment.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-08 8:56 ` Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-08 10:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2015-09-08 16:16 ` Luca Ceresoli 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-09-08 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 14:26:31 +0530, Dinesh Guleria wrote: > With seggers j- link can i flash uboot to the Nand flash of this board ? You don't need that. The Atmel SoCs have a built-in "monitor" that you can talk to over the USB device port. It requires a tool called SAM-BA. If you're looking at beginning with the Atmel Xplained, you can follow the slides/labs at http://free-electrons.com/training/embedded-linux/, this training is done on this platform, and will teach you how to build and flash the bootloader, how to build and run a kernel, how to build your minimal userspace, how to use Buildroot, etc. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-08 8:56 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-08 10:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-09-08 16:16 ` Luca Ceresoli 2015-09-08 18:03 ` Dinesh Guleria 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Luca Ceresoli @ 2015-09-08 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Dear Dinesh, Dinesh Guleria wrote: > So i will go for atmel_sama5d3_xplained . > http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-38394/l/evaluation-kit-for-at91sam9g45 > > >> I have no idea, but it is fully supported by Buildroot, both for > booting from > SD card and booting from flash. > > With seggers j- link can i flash uboot to the Nand flash of this board ? To flash the bootloader on the sama5d3_xplained board you don't need any JTAG interface. You just need to remove the NAND CS jumper on the board and connect on UART with the sam-ba tool. The labs from the Free Electrons training material have detailed information on how to do that: http://free-electrons.com/doc/training/embedded-linux/ -- Luca ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-08 16:16 ` Luca Ceresoli @ 2015-09-08 18:03 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-12 11:11 ` Dinesh Guleria 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-08 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Thanks for the info. Regards, Dinesh On 8 Sep 2015 21:46, "Luca Ceresoli" <luca@lucaceresoli.net> wrote: > Dear Dinesh, > > Dinesh Guleria wrote: > >> So i will go for atmel_sama5d3_xplained . >> >> http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-38394/l/evaluation-kit-for-at91sam9g45 >> >> >> I have no idea, but it is fully supported by Buildroot, both for >> booting from >> SD card and booting from flash. >> >> With seggers j- link can i flash uboot to the Nand flash of this board ? >> > > To flash the bootloader on the sama5d3_xplained board you don't need > any JTAG interface. You just need to remove the NAND CS jumper on the > board and connect on UART with the sam-ba tool. > > The labs from the Free Electrons training material have detailed > information on how to do that: > http://free-electrons.com/doc/training/embedded-linux/ > > -- > Luca > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20150908/58099dcd/attachment.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-08 18:03 ` Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-12 11:11 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-13 11:51 ` Dinesh Guleria 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-12 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Please suggest will it be worth buying these accessories with following board :-- http://www.element14.com/community/mobile/mobile-access.jspa#jive-content?content=%2Fapi%2Fcore%2Fv3%2Fcontents%2F625493 This LCD supports 16/24 bit RGB TFT display. So will it be compatible with this board ? *WIFI_Dongle :--* http://www.element14.com/community/mobile/mobile-access.jspa#jive-content?content=%2Fcommunity%2Fapi%2Fcore%2Fv3%2Fcontents%3Ffilter%3DentityDescriptor(102%2C68464) *4.3 LCD MODULE AND ADAPTER BOARD :--* http://www.element14.com/community/mobile/mobile-access.jspa#jive-content?content=%2Fcommunity%2Fapi%2Fcore%2Fv3%2Fcontents%3Ffilter%3DentityDescriptor(102%2C68483) *Converter Cable - USB to 3-pin TTL UART :--* http://www.element14.com/community/mobile/mobile-access.jspa#jive-content?content=%2Fcommunity%2Fapi%2Fcore%2Fv3%2Fcontents%3Ffilter%3DentityDescriptor(102%2C76605) Regards, Dinesh On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Dinesh Guleria <din.gulu.er@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the info. > > Regards, > Dinesh > On 8 Sep 2015 21:46, "Luca Ceresoli" <luca@lucaceresoli.net> wrote: > >> Dear Dinesh, >> >> Dinesh Guleria wrote: >> >>> So i will go for atmel_sama5d3_xplained . >>> >>> http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-38394/l/evaluation-kit-for-at91sam9g45 >>> >>> >> I have no idea, but it is fully supported by Buildroot, both for >>> booting from >>> SD card and booting from flash. >>> >>> With seggers j- link can i flash uboot to the Nand flash of this board ? >>> >> >> To flash the bootloader on the sama5d3_xplained board you don't need >> any JTAG interface. You just need to remove the NAND CS jumper on the >> board and connect on UART with the sam-ba tool. >> >> The labs from the Free Electrons training material have detailed >> information on how to do that: >> http://free-electrons.com/doc/training/embedded-linux/ >> >> -- >> Luca >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20150912/eb3e0727/attachment.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-12 11:11 ` Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-13 11:51 ` Dinesh Guleria 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-13 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Actually i mean to say can i use this lcd with gtk & QT libraries or other linux graphical libraries. Then i will opt to buy this lcd as its cost is almost sane as board cost. Regards, Dinesh On 12 Sep 2015 16:41, "Dinesh Guleria" <din.gulu.er@gmail.com> wrote: > Please suggest will it be worth buying these accessories with following > board :-- > > http://www.element14.com/community/mobile/mobile-access.jspa#jive-content?content=%2Fapi%2Fcore%2Fv3%2Fcontents%2F625493 > > This LCD supports 16/24 bit RGB TFT display. So will it be compatible with > this board ? > > > *WIFI_Dongle :--* > > http://www.element14.com/community/mobile/mobile-access.jspa#jive-content?content=%2Fcommunity%2Fapi%2Fcore%2Fv3%2Fcontents%3Ffilter%3DentityDescriptor(102%2C68464) > *4.3 LCD MODULE AND ADAPTER BOARD :--* > > http://www.element14.com/community/mobile/mobile-access.jspa#jive-content?content=%2Fcommunity%2Fapi%2Fcore%2Fv3%2Fcontents%3Ffilter%3DentityDescriptor(102%2C68483) > *Converter Cable - USB to 3-pin TTL UART :--* > > http://www.element14.com/community/mobile/mobile-access.jspa#jive-content?content=%2Fcommunity%2Fapi%2Fcore%2Fv3%2Fcontents%3Ffilter%3DentityDescriptor(102%2C76605) > > Regards, > Dinesh > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Dinesh Guleria <din.gulu.er@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks for the info. >> >> Regards, >> Dinesh >> On 8 Sep 2015 21:46, "Luca Ceresoli" <luca@lucaceresoli.net> wrote: >> >>> Dear Dinesh, >>> >>> Dinesh Guleria wrote: >>> >>>> So i will go for atmel_sama5d3_xplained . >>>> >>>> http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-38394/l/evaluation-kit-for-at91sam9g45 >>>> >>>> >> I have no idea, but it is fully supported by Buildroot, both for >>>> booting from >>>> SD card and booting from flash. >>>> >>>> With seggers j- link can i flash uboot to the Nand flash of this board ? >>>> >>> >>> To flash the bootloader on the sama5d3_xplained board you don't need >>> any JTAG interface. You just need to remove the NAND CS jumper on the >>> board and connect on UART with the sam-ba tool. >>> >>> The labs from the Free Electrons training material have detailed >>> information on how to do that: >>> http://free-electrons.com/doc/training/embedded-linux/ >>> >>> -- >>> Luca >>> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20150913/4c1284cb/attachment.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-08 7:17 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 2015-09-08 8:56 ` Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-08 10:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2015-09-08 11:28 ` Alexandre Belloni 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-09-08 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Arnout, On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:17:36 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot > > Well, the linux4sam fork is relatively old. In addition, there are some changes > in it that are incorrect. So I'd stick to upstream buildroot :-) My colleague Alexandre Belloni has recently updated or added numerous Atmel defconfigs, and Atmel's plan is to deprecate their Buildroot fork and to just tell people to use the upstream version (at least that's what I understood). Alex? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-08 10:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-09-08 11:28 ` Alexandre Belloni 2015-09-08 12:34 ` Dinesh Guleria 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Alexandre Belloni @ 2015-09-08 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hi, On 08/09/2015 at 12:01:22 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote : > Arnout, > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:17:36 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > > > http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot > > > > Well, the linux4sam fork is relatively old. In addition, there are some changes > > in it that are incorrect. So I'd stick to upstream buildroot :-) > > My colleague Alexandre Belloni has recently updated or added numerous > Atmel defconfigs, and Atmel's plan is to deprecate their Buildroot fork > and to just tell people to use the upstream version (at least that's > what I understood). > > Alex? > It is deprecated, this will be announced this week. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-08 11:28 ` Alexandre Belloni @ 2015-09-08 12:34 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-08 13:26 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 2015-09-08 13:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-08 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot >> don't need that. But seggers jlink(i.e jtag tool) can be used as an alternative tool to burn uboot , kernel to NAND of this board right ? >> The Atmel SoCs have a built-in "monitor" that you can talk to over the USB device port. It requires a tool called SAM-BA. Ok great. So i need only a hardware USB cable for this no external hardware device right ? http:// <http://www.atmel.com/tools/atmelsam-bain-systemprogrammer.aspx> www.atmel.com <http://www.atmel.com/tools/atmelsam-bain-systemprogrammer.aspx>/tools/ <http://www.atmel.com/tools/atmelsam-bain-systemprogrammer.aspx> atmelsam-bain-systemprogrammer.aspx <http://www.atmel.com/tools/atmelsam-bain-systemprogrammer.aspx> So i can burn uboot, kernel & rfilesystem to the board NAND flash using usb cable & SAM-BA software tool, right ? >> you're looking at beginning with the Atmel Xplained, you can follow the slides/labs Thanks for pointing me to such a wonderful material, it means a lot to me. Do these two below link point to same board which is mentioned on your site ? http://www.element14.com/community/mobile/mobile-access.jspa#jive-content?content=%2Fapi%2Fcore%2Fv3%2Fcontents%2F625493 http://www.atmel.com/tools/ATSAMA5D3-XPLD.aspx >> Atmel's plan is to deprecate their Buildroot fork >> It is deprecated, this will be announced this week. I did not understood this statement on one hand you are saying buildroot supports Atmel SAM soc & on other hand you are saying support will be depreciated from next week. Regards Katoch Hi, On 08/09/2015 at 12:01:22 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote : > Arnout, > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:17:36 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > > > http:// <http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot> www.at91.com <http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot>/ <http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot>linux4sam <http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot>/bin/view/ <http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot>Linux4SAM <http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot>/ <http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot>BuildRoot <http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot> > > > > Well, the linux4sam fork is relatively old. In addition, there are some changes > > in it that are incorrect. So I'd stick to upstream buildroot :-) > > My colleague Alexandre Belloni has recently updated or added numerous > Atmel defconfigs, and Atmel's plan is to deprecate their Buildroot fork > and to just tell people to use the upstream version (at least that's > what I understood). > > Alex? > It is deprecated, this will be announced this week. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http:// <http://free-electrons.com>free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20150908/51905773/attachment.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-08 12:34 ` Dinesh Guleria @ 2015-09-08 13:26 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 2015-09-08 13:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2015-09-08 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot On 08-09-15 14:34, Dinesh Guleria wrote: >>> Atmel's plan is to deprecate their Buildroot fork >>> It is deprecated, this will be announced this week. > I did not understood this statement on one hand you are saying buildroot > supports Atmel SAM soc & on other hand you are saying support will be > depreciated from next week. The linux4sam fork of buildroot will be deprecated, because the official buildroot has sufficient support for Atmel chips. I hope they'll also update the linux4sam wiki pages to remove all references to that fork... Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers 2015-09-08 12:34 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-08 13:26 ` Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2015-09-08 13:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-09-08 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Dinesh, Could you improve a bit the way you quote text when replying to e-mails? Your quoting style makes it quite hard to reply. On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 18:04:28 +0530, Dinesh Guleria wrote: > >> don't need that. > But seggers jlink(i.e jtag tool) can be used as an alternative tool to burn > uboot , kernel to NAND of this board right ? Yes, probably. > >> The Atmel SoCs have a built-in "monitor" that you > can talk to over the USB device port. It requires a tool called SAM-BA. > Ok great. So i need only a hardware USB cable for this no external hardware > device right ? Yes, correct. > So i can burn uboot, kernel & rfilesystem to the board NAND flash using usb > cable & SAM-BA software tool, right ? Absolutely. > >> you're looking at beginning with the Atmel Xplained, you can follow > the slides/labs > Thanks for pointing me to such a wonderful material, it means a lot to me. > Do these two below link point to same board which is mentioned on your site > ? > http://www.element14.com/community/mobile/mobile-access.jspa#jive-content?content=%2Fapi%2Fcore%2Fv3%2Fcontents%2F625493 > > http://www.atmel.com/tools/ATSAMA5D3-XPLD.aspx Yes, it is this board. > >> Atmel's plan is to deprecate their Buildroot fork > >> It is deprecated, this will be announced this week. > I did not understood this statement on one hand you are saying buildroot > supports Atmel SAM soc & on other hand you are saying support will be > depreciated from next week. Atmel used to have a fork of Buildroot with the support for their boards. Instead of having such a fork, they decided to now support their boards directly in the official Buildroot. Their fork is therefore no longer necessary and will be deprecated. Just use the official Buildroot. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-13 11:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-09-07 12:36 [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-07 19:38 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 2015-09-08 2:13 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-08 7:17 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 2015-09-08 8:56 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-08 10:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2015-09-08 16:16 ` Luca Ceresoli 2015-09-08 18:03 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-12 11:11 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-13 11:51 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-08 10:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2015-09-08 11:28 ` Alexandre Belloni 2015-09-08 12:34 ` Dinesh Guleria 2015-09-08 13:26 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 2015-09-08 13:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox