DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.2 04/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:16:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709141640.249B71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709140600.90950-5-sj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `damon_pa_apply_probes` callback unconditionally returns 0 instead of computing and returning the maximum probe hits weighted sum when `return_max_wsum` is true, violating the updated API contract.
--

--- Patch [4]: [RFC PATCH v1.2 04/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum ---
commit ed82d24ec75fdb639533062e293614cb1cebe866
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>

mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum

This commit updates the apply_probes() callback protocol in the DAMON
operations to optionally return the maximum probe hits weighted sum. This
value is intended to help the core layer adjust regions in the future.

> diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
> index 3c2a4d673bf62..4e1845ce83870 100644
> --- a/include/linux/damon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
> @@ -648,7 +648,9 @@ enum damon_ops_id {
>   * of its update.  The value will be used for regions adjustment threshold.
>   * @apply_probes should apply the data attribute probes to each region and
>   * accordingly update the probe hits counter of the region.  It should also
> - * &set sampling_addr of each region if ``set_samples`` is true.
> + * &set sampling_addr of each region if ``set_samples`` is true.  It should
> + * also return maximum probe hits weighted sum of regions if
> + * ``return_max_wsum`` is true.
>   * @get_scheme_score should return the priority score of a region for a scheme
>   * as an integer in [0, &DAMOS_MAX_SCORE].
>   * @apply_scheme is called from @kdamond when a region for user provided

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/mm/damon/paddr.c b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> index ff4fcca949660..3eba3564a31fc 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/paddr.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static bool damon_pa_filter_pass(phys_addr_t pa, struct folio *folio,
>  	return pass;
>  }
>  
> -static void damon_pa_apply_probes(struct damon_ctx *ctx, bool set_samples)
> +static unsigned int damon_pa_apply_probes(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
> +		bool set_samples, bool return_max_wsum)
>  {
>  	struct damon_target *t;
>  	struct damon_region *r;
> @@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ static void damon_pa_apply_probes(struct damon_ctx *ctx, bool set_samples)
>  				folio_put(folio);
>  		}
>  	}
> +	return 0;

[Severity: Medium]
The kernel-doc for apply_probes states it should return the maximum probe hits
weighted sum if return_max_wsum is true.

However, damon_pa_apply_probes() unconditionally returns 0 here without
computing the weighted sum.

Will this cause the core layer to receive an incorrect threshold of 0 when it
starts passing return_max_wsum = true in the future?

>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709140600.90950-1-sj@kernel.org?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 14:05 [RFC PATCH v1.2 00/19] mm/damon: introduce data attributes only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 01/19] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_probe->weight SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 02/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probes() ops callback to set sampling address SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:47     ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 03/19] mm/damon/paddr: set samples in apply_probes() if requested SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:48     ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 04/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:16   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 14:49     ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 05/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_probe_hits_wsum() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 06/19] mm/damon/paddr: respect return_max_wsum SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 07/19] mm/damon/core: use abs_diff() instead of abs() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:54     ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 08/19] mm/damon/core: extend merge function to work with probe hits SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:56     ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 09/19] mm/damon/core: disallow probe_hits overflow on attrs only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 10/19] mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:58     ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 11/19] mm/damon/core: disable access monitoring when probe weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 12/19] mm/damon/core: set samples in apply_probes() if " SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:00     ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 13/19] mm/damon/core: s/max_nr_accesses/max_merge_score/ in kdamond_fn() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 14/19] mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:02     ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 15/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_has_probe_weight() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:03     ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 16/19] mm/damon/sysfs: implement probe/weight file SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 17/19] Docs/mm/damon/design: document attrs-only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 18/19] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: document weight sysfs file SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 19/19] Docs/ABI/damon: document probe weight file SJ Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260709141640.249B71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox