From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.2 10/19] mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:36:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709143652.6A8E61F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709140600.90950-11-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Spelling mistake in comment.
--
--- Patch [10]: [RFC PATCH v1.2 10/19] mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow ---
commit 3e76c3dde55500288f3eccb730acd26964bfdad2
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow
This commit adds parameter validation to prevent probe hits weighted sum
overflow. It ensures that the combination of probe weights and aggregation
intervals does not exceed the maximum allowed values.
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index 4f1425e56950b..b585e4bf035f1 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1342,6 +1345,18 @@ static bool damon_valid_probe_params(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> sample_interval = ctx->attrs.sample_interval ? : 1;
> if (ctx->attrs.aggr_interval / sample_interval > U8_MAX)
> return false;
> +
> + /* invlaid if probe hits weighted sum can overflow */
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but there is a typo in this comment ("invlaid" instead of
"invalid").
> + max_probe_hits = damon_nr_samples_per_aggr(&ctx->attrs);
> + wsum = 0;
> + damon_for_each_probe(probe, ctx) {
> + if (probe->weight > UINT_MAX / max_probe_hits)
> + return false;
> + wsum_to_add = probe->weight * max_probe_hits;
> + if (UINT_MAX - wsum < wsum_to_add)
> + return false;
> + wsum += wsum_to_add;
> + }
> return true;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709140600.90950-1-sj@kernel.org?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 14:05 [RFC PATCH v1.2 00/19] mm/damon: introduce data attributes only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 01/19] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_probe->weight SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 02/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probes() ops callback to set sampling address SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:47 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 03/19] mm/damon/paddr: set samples in apply_probes() if requested SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:48 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 04/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:49 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 05/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_probe_hits_wsum() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 06/19] mm/damon/paddr: respect return_max_wsum SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 07/19] mm/damon/core: use abs_diff() instead of abs() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:54 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 08/19] mm/damon/core: extend merge function to work with probe hits SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:56 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 09/19] mm/damon/core: disallow probe_hits overflow on attrs only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 10/19] mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:36 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 14:58 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 11/19] mm/damon/core: disable access monitoring when probe weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 12/19] mm/damon/core: set samples in apply_probes() if " SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:00 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 13/19] mm/damon/core: s/max_nr_accesses/max_merge_score/ in kdamond_fn() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 14/19] mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:02 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 15/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_has_probe_weight() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:03 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 16/19] mm/damon/sysfs: implement probe/weight file SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 17/19] Docs/mm/damon/design: document attrs-only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 18/19] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: document weight sysfs file SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 19/19] Docs/ABI/damon: document probe weight file SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709143652.6A8E61F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox