From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.2 14/19] mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 08:02:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709150204.97055-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709144901.96D8C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:49:01 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] Missing validation for `apply_probes` callback when probe weights are configured leads to complete DAMON region collapse.
> --
>
> --- Patch [14]: [RFC PATCH v1.2 14/19] mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set ---
> commit a4d0e22d5d4d741ec6086d8f49fefbab2c3b57bd
> Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set
>
> When probe weights are set, DAMON merges regions based on their probe
> hits weighted sum. But the merge threshold is calculated based on the
> access frequency. Update it to retrieve the maximum probe hits weighted
> sum in the snapshot from apply_probes() ops callback, and generate the
> threshold based on it.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> > index 8837b2129baa6..12c66edecd783 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -3776,9 +3777,18 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
> >
> > if (!access_check_disabled && ctx->ops.check_accesses)
> > max_merge_score = ctx->ops.check_accesses(ctx);
> > - if (ctx->ops.apply_probes)
> > - ctx->ops.apply_probes(ctx, access_check_disabled,
> > - false);
> > + if (ctx->ops.apply_probes) {
> > + if (time_after_eq(ctx->passed_sample_intervals,
> > + next_aggregation_sis) &&
> > + access_check_disabled)
> > + get_max_wsum = true;
> > + else
> > + get_max_wsum = false;
> > + max_wsum = ctx->ops.apply_probes(ctx,
> > + access_check_disabled, get_max_wsum);
> > + if (get_max_wsum)
> > + max_merge_score = max_wsum;
> > + }
>
> [Severity: High]
> If a configuration has probe weights enabled (so access_check_disabled is
> true) but the active operations do not implement the apply_probes callback
> (like vaddr or fvaddr), does max_merge_score remain 0 here?
>
> It appears that skipping both check_accesses() and apply_probes() leaves
> max_merge_score at 0. Later, when kdamond_merge_regions() is called with a
> threshold of 0, and all regions have 0 probe hits, damon_merge_regions_of()
> would see a difference of 0 between adjacent regions.
>
> Could this lead to aggressive merging of all regions up to sz_limit,
> effectively collapsing the fine-grained region layout?
>
> Should there be a validation check in damon_valid_probe_params() to reject
> configurations where probe weights are set but ctx->ops.apply_probes is
> missing?
No, this is an intentional design. The user should correctly config DAMON.
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709140600.90950-1-sj@kernel.org?part=14
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 14:05 [RFC PATCH v1.2 00/19] mm/damon: introduce data attributes only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 01/19] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_probe->weight SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 02/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probes() ops callback to set sampling address SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:47 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 03/19] mm/damon/paddr: set samples in apply_probes() if requested SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:48 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 04/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:49 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 05/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_probe_hits_wsum() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 06/19] mm/damon/paddr: respect return_max_wsum SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 07/19] mm/damon/core: use abs_diff() instead of abs() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:54 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 08/19] mm/damon/core: extend merge function to work with probe hits SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:56 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 09/19] mm/damon/core: disallow probe_hits overflow on attrs only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 10/19] mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:58 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 11/19] mm/damon/core: disable access monitoring when probe weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 12/19] mm/damon/core: set samples in apply_probes() if " SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:00 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 13/19] mm/damon/core: s/max_nr_accesses/max_merge_score/ in kdamond_fn() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 14/19] mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:02 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 15/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_has_probe_weight() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:03 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 16/19] mm/damon/sysfs: implement probe/weight file SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 17/19] Docs/mm/damon/design: document attrs-only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 18/19] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: document weight sysfs file SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 19/19] Docs/ABI/damon: document probe weight file SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709150204.97055-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox