From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.2 10/19] mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 07:58:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709145804.96776-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709143652.6A8E61F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>
On Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:36:51 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Low] Spelling mistake in comment.
> --
>
> --- Patch [10]: [RFC PATCH v1.2 10/19] mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow ---
> commit 3e76c3dde55500288f3eccb730acd26964bfdad2
> Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow
>
> This commit adds parameter validation to prevent probe hits weighted sum
> overflow. It ensures that the combination of probe weights and aggregation
> intervals does not exceed the maximum allowed values.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> > index 4f1425e56950b..b585e4bf035f1 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -1342,6 +1345,18 @@ static bool damon_valid_probe_params(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> > sample_interval = ctx->attrs.sample_interval ? : 1;
> > if (ctx->attrs.aggr_interval / sample_interval > U8_MAX)
> > return false;
> > +
> > + /* invlaid if probe hits weighted sum can overflow */
>
> [Severity: Low]
> This isn't a bug, but there is a typo in this comment ("invlaid" instead of
> "invalid").
Good finding. I will fix in the next revision.
>
> > + max_probe_hits = damon_nr_samples_per_aggr(&ctx->attrs);
> > + wsum = 0;
> > + damon_for_each_probe(probe, ctx) {
> > + if (probe->weight > UINT_MAX / max_probe_hits)
> > + return false;
> > + wsum_to_add = probe->weight * max_probe_hits;
> > + if (UINT_MAX - wsum < wsum_to_add)
> > + return false;
> > + wsum += wsum_to_add;
> > + }
> > return true;
> > }
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709140600.90950-1-sj@kernel.org?part=10
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 14:05 [RFC PATCH v1.2 00/19] mm/damon: introduce data attributes only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 01/19] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_probe->weight SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 02/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probes() ops callback to set sampling address SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:47 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 03/19] mm/damon/paddr: set samples in apply_probes() if requested SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:48 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 04/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:49 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 05/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_probe_hits_wsum() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 06/19] mm/damon/paddr: respect return_max_wsum SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 07/19] mm/damon/core: use abs_diff() instead of abs() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:54 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 08/19] mm/damon/core: extend merge function to work with probe hits SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:56 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 09/19] mm/damon/core: disallow probe_hits overflow on attrs only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 10/19] mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 14:58 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 11/19] mm/damon/core: disable access monitoring when probe weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 12/19] mm/damon/core: set samples in apply_probes() if " SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:00 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 13/19] mm/damon/core: s/max_nr_accesses/max_merge_score/ in kdamond_fn() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 14/19] mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:02 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 15/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_has_probe_weight() SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 15:03 ` SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 16/19] mm/damon/sysfs: implement probe/weight file SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 17/19] Docs/mm/damon/design: document attrs-only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 18/19] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: document weight sysfs file SJ Park
2026-07-09 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 19/19] Docs/ABI/damon: document probe weight file SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709145804.96776-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox