From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Koichiro Den" <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Track non-LL mode in DMA data
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 17:15:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260620171541.E59501F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260620170040.3756043-7-den@valinux.co.jp>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Calling pci_free_irq_vectors() in remove() violates API guidelines for devices enabled with pcim_enable_device() and leads to a double free.
--
commit 4807e012ff4fafc258bc7806f34cdce5751bf7bf
Author: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
Subject: dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Track non-LL mode in DMA data
The dw-edma-pcie driver copies static template data into a mutable
dw_edma_pcie_data instance before applying capability-derived updates. This
commit keeps the derived non-LL mode in that copy as well.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> index 70ea031147d18..0ea8d59782b44 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -326,7 +327,6 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> struct dw_edma_chip *chip;
> int err, nr_irqs;
> int i, mask;
> - bool non_ll = false;
>
> if (!pdata)
> return -ENODEV;
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a potential problem in how this
driver handles IRQ cleanup.
[Severity: High]
Does dw_edma_pcie_remove() result in a double-free of the IRQ vectors?
This driver calls pcim_enable_device() in dw_edma_pcie_probe(), which marks
the PCI device as managed. Later in the probe function,
pci_alloc_irq_vectors() is called, which automatically registers a devres
action to free the vectors on device detach.
However, dw_edma_pcie_remove() manually calls pci_free_irq_vectors():
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c:dw_edma_pcie_remove() {
...
/* Freeing IRQs */
pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
}
Since the devres action remains registered, will it attempt to free the IRQs
again, causing a double-free on driver unload?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260620170040.3756043-1-den@valinux.co.jp?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-20 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-20 17:00 [PATCH v3 00/13] dmaengine: dw-edma: Prepare for PCI EP DMA (part 1/3) Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add per-channel interrupt routing control Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add core quiesce operations Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add delegated channel request helpers Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] dmaengine: dw-edma: Initialize IRQ data before requesting IRQs Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add partial channel ownership mode Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Track non-LL mode in DMA data Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Add capability match data Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Rename vsec_data to dma_data Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Add platform ops to match data Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Add register offset match flag Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Factor out descriptor block address lookup Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Handle optional data blocks Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:00 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Add chip flags to match data Koichiro Den
2026-06-20 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260620171541.E59501F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox