Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status
@ 2018-03-16  1:21 Dhinakaran Pandiyan
  2018-03-16  1:41 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan @ 2018-03-16  1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: igt-dev; +Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan, Rodrigo Vivi

Kernel does not expose the "Active: " flag in edp_psr_status anymore.
So test for "HW Enabled & Active bit: yes", although this isn't completely
accurate either for frontbuffer tests. Let's go with this for now until
the kernel exposes HW PSR status.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105519
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
---
 tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c            | 2 +-
 tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
index b01c769c..280ddbd7 100644
--- a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
+++ b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(int fd)
 	char buf[256];
 
 	igt_debugfs_read(fd, "i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
-	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n");
+	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
 }
 
 static bool psr_wait_until_enabled(int fd)
diff --git a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
index 2b85392d..5cba4158 100644
--- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
+++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
@@ -781,8 +781,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(void)
 	char buf[256];
 
 	debugfs_read("i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
-	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n") &&
-	       strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
+	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
 }
 
 static void psr_print_status(void)
-- 
2.14.1

_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status
  2018-03-16  1:21 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status Dhinakaran Pandiyan
@ 2018-03-16  1:41 ` Patchwork
  2018-03-16  3:11 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-03-16  1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran; +Cc: igt-dev

== Series Details ==

Series: tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/40070/
State : success

== Summary ==

IGT patchset tested on top of latest successful build
2e92134b4e4f754239f9721b8781ce2fc0aab07c tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Reduce fbc status spam, v2.

with latest DRM-Tip kernel build CI_DRM_3935
9ac56f76a6a2 drm-tip: 2018y-03m-15d-22h-52m-42s UTC integration manifest

No testlist changes.

---- Known issues:

Test gem_mmap_gtt:
        Subgroup basic-small-bo-tiledx:
                pass       -> FAIL       (fi-gdg-551) fdo#102575
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
                pass       -> INCOMPLETE (fi-snb-2520m) fdo#103713

fdo#102575 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102575
fdo#103713 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103713

fi-bdw-5557u     total:285  pass:264  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:429s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:285  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:441s
fi-blb-e6850     total:285  pass:220  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:64  time:379s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:285  pass:239  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:539s
fi-bwr-2160      total:285  pass:180  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:105 time:296s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:285  pass:256  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:515s
fi-byt-j1900     total:285  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:518s
fi-byt-n2820     total:285  pass:246  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:505s
fi-cfl-8700k     total:285  pass:257  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:408s
fi-cfl-s2        total:285  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:580s
fi-cfl-u         total:285  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:508s
fi-cnl-drrs      total:285  pass:254  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:525s
fi-cnl-y3        total:285  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:598s
fi-elk-e7500     total:285  pass:226  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:59  time:417s
fi-gdg-551       total:285  pass:176  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:108 time:318s
fi-glk-1         total:285  pass:257  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:539s
fi-hsw-4770      total:285  pass:258  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:401s
fi-ilk-650       total:285  pass:225  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:421s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:285  pass:256  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:464s
fi-ivb-3770      total:285  pass:252  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:33  time:427s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:285  pass:260  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:474s
fi-kbl-7567u     total:285  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:469s
fi-kbl-r         total:285  pass:258  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:514s
fi-pnv-d510      total:285  pass:219  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:656s
fi-skl-6260u     total:285  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:441s
fi-skl-6600u     total:285  pass:258  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:532s
fi-skl-6700hq    total:285  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:540s
fi-skl-6700k2    total:285  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:510s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:285  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:505s
fi-skl-guc       total:285  pass:257  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:427s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:285  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:446s
fi-snb-2520m     total:242  pass:208  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:33 
fi-snb-2600      total:285  pass:245  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:40  time:400s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_1142/issues.html
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning for tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status
  2018-03-16  1:21 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status Dhinakaran Pandiyan
  2018-03-16  1:41 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2018-03-16  3:11 ` Patchwork
  2018-03-16  6:29 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Lofstedt, Marta
  2018-03-16 16:19 ` Maarten Lankhorst
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-03-16  3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran; +Cc: igt-dev

== Series Details ==

Series: tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/40070/
State : warning

== Summary ==

---- Possible new issues:

Test gem_tiled_swapping:
        Subgroup non-threaded:
                skip       -> PASS       (shard-snb)
Test kms_draw_crc:
        Subgroup draw-method-xrgb2101010-blt-xtiled:
                skip       -> PASS       (shard-snb)
Test kms_universal_plane:
        Subgroup cursor-fb-leak-pipe-a:
                pass       -> SKIP       (shard-snb)

---- Known issues:

Test gem_eio:
        Subgroup in-flight-external:
                incomplete -> PASS       (shard-apl) fdo#105341
Test gem_exec_suspend:
        Subgroup basic-s3:
                skip       -> PASS       (shard-snb) fdo#104311
Test kms_cursor_crc:
        Subgroup cursor-256x256-suspend:
                pass       -> SKIP       (shard-snb) fdo#103375
Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup 2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible:
                fail       -> PASS       (shard-hsw) fdo#102887 +1
        Subgroup 2x-plain-flip-ts-check:
                fail       -> PASS       (shard-hsw) fdo#100368
Test kms_plane_multiple:
        Subgroup atomic-pipe-a-tiling-x:
                fail       -> PASS       (shard-snb) fdo#103166
Test kms_vblank:
        Subgroup pipe-a-accuracy-idle:
                pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#102583

fdo#105341 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105341
fdo#104311 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104311
fdo#103375 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103375
fdo#102887 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102887
fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
fdo#103166 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
fdo#102583 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102583

shard-apl        total:3442 pass:1814 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:7   skip:1619 time:13093s
shard-hsw        total:3442 pass:1766 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:1671 time:11883s
shard-snb        total:3442 pass:1355 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:2083 time:7205s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-kbl        total:2134 pass:1192 dwarn:7   dfail:0   fail:4   skip:929 time:5620s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_1142/shards.html
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status
  2018-03-16  1:21 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status Dhinakaran Pandiyan
  2018-03-16  1:41 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
  2018-03-16  3:11 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork
@ 2018-03-16  6:29 ` Lofstedt, Marta
  2018-03-16 16:27   ` Maarten Lankhorst
  2018-03-20 11:26   ` Lofstedt, Marta
  2018-03-16 16:19 ` Maarten Lankhorst
  3 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lofstedt, Marta @ 2018-03-16  6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
  Cc: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran, Vivi, Rodrigo

I would RB this if there was some kms_frontbuffer_tracking PSR related tests that was run on PW.

Could you re-send this together with a HACK patch on fast-feedback.testlist where you replace the standard tests with some kms_frontbuffer_tracking PSR related tests that was hit on the bug?

/Marta

> -----Original Message-----
> From: igt-dev [mailto:igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Dhinakaran Pandiyan
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 3:21 AM
> To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo
> <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update
> check for PSR status
> 
> Kernel does not expose the "Active: " flag in edp_psr_status anymore.
> So test for "HW Enabled & Active bit: yes", although this isn't completely
> accurate either for frontbuffer tests. Let's go with this for now until the
> kernel exposes HW PSR status.
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105519
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c            | 2 +-
>  tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c index
> b01c769c..280ddbd7 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(int fd)
>  	char buf[256];
> 
>  	igt_debugfs_read(fd, "i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
> -	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n");
> +	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
>  }
> 
>  static bool psr_wait_until_enabled(int fd) diff --git
> a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> index 2b85392d..5cba4158 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> @@ -781,8 +781,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(void)
>  	char buf[256];
> 
>  	debugfs_read("i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
> -	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n") &&
> -	       strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
> +	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
>  }
> 
>  static void psr_print_status(void)
> --
> 2.14.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status
  2018-03-16  1:21 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status Dhinakaran Pandiyan
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-03-16  6:29 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Lofstedt, Marta
@ 2018-03-16 16:19 ` Maarten Lankhorst
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2018-03-16 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dhinakaran Pandiyan, igt-dev; +Cc: Rodrigo Vivi

Op 16-03-18 om 02:21 schreef Dhinakaran Pandiyan:
> Kernel does not expose the "Active: " flag in edp_psr_status anymore.
> So test for "HW Enabled & Active bit: yes", although this isn't completely
> accurate either for frontbuffer tests. Let's go with this for now until
> the kernel exposes HW PSR status.
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105519
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c            | 2 +-
>  tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
> index b01c769c..280ddbd7 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(int fd)
>  	char buf[256];
>  
>  	igt_debugfs_read(fd, "i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
> -	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n");
> +	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
>  }
>  
>  static bool psr_wait_until_enabled(int fd)
> diff --git a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> index 2b85392d..5cba4158 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> @@ -781,8 +781,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(void)
>  	char buf[256];
>  
>  	debugfs_read("i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
> -	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n") &&
> -	       strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
> +	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
>  }
>  
>  static void psr_print_status(void)

Hey,

If enable_psr is set to link standby, won't "Main link in standby mode: yes" also be a valid way of entering PSR?

This is probably the case for HSW, I've sent my own patch for this..

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/211060/

~Maarten

_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status
  2018-03-16  6:29 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Lofstedt, Marta
@ 2018-03-16 16:27   ` Maarten Lankhorst
  2018-03-20 11:26   ` Lofstedt, Marta
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2018-03-16 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lofstedt, Marta, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran,
	igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
  Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo

Op 16-03-18 om 07:29 schreef Lofstedt, Marta:
> I would RB this if there was some kms_frontbuffer_tracking PSR related tests that was run on PW.
>
> Could you re-send this together with a HACK patch on fast-feedback.testlist where you replace the standard tests with some kms_frontbuffer_tracking PSR related tests that was hit on the bug?
>
Same..

Link standby mode only matches the dev_priv->link_standby parameter not the actual hw mode, so this patch is

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: igt-dev [mailto:igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
>> Dhinakaran Pandiyan
>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 3:21 AM
>> To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo
>> <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update
>> check for PSR status
>>
>> Kernel does not expose the "Active: " flag in edp_psr_status anymore.
>> So test for "HW Enabled & Active bit: yes", although this isn't completely
>> accurate either for frontbuffer tests. Let's go with this for now until the
>> kernel exposes HW PSR status.
>>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105519
>> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c            | 2 +-
>>  tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 3 +--
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c index
>> b01c769c..280ddbd7 100644
>> --- a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
>> +++ b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
>> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(int fd)
>>  	char buf[256];
>>
>>  	igt_debugfs_read(fd, "i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
>> -	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n");
>> +	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
>>  }
>>
>>  static bool psr_wait_until_enabled(int fd) diff --git
>> a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
>> index 2b85392d..5cba4158 100644
>> --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
>> +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
>> @@ -781,8 +781,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(void)
>>  	char buf[256];
>>
>>  	debugfs_read("i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
>> -	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n") &&
>> -	       strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
>> +	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
>>  }
>>
>>  static void psr_print_status(void)
>> --
>> 2.14.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> igt-dev mailing list
>> igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev


_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status
  2018-03-16  6:29 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Lofstedt, Marta
  2018-03-16 16:27   ` Maarten Lankhorst
@ 2018-03-20 11:26   ` Lofstedt, Marta
  2018-03-20 11:36     ` Maarten Lankhorst
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lofstedt, Marta @ 2018-03-20 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran, 'igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org'
  Cc: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran, Vivi, Rodrigo

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/40137/

has no failing PST frombuffer_tracking tests. So,

Reviewed-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lofstedt, Marta
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 8:30 AM
> To: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>; igt-
> dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo
> <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update
> check for PSR status
> 
> I would RB this if there was some kms_frontbuffer_tracking PSR related tests
> that was run on PW.
> 
> Could you re-send this together with a HACK patch on fast-feedback.testlist
> where you replace the standard tests with some kms_frontbuffer_tracking
> PSR related tests that was hit on the bug?
> 
> /Marta
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: igt-dev [mailto:igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> > Of Dhinakaran Pandiyan
> > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 3:21 AM
> > To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>; Vivi,
> > Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
> > Update check for PSR status
> >
> > Kernel does not expose the "Active: " flag in edp_psr_status anymore.
> > So test for "HW Enabled & Active bit: yes", although this isn't
> > completely accurate either for frontbuffer tests. Let's go with this
> > for now until the kernel exposes HW PSR status.
> >
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105519
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c            | 2 +-
> >  tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 3 +--
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c index
> > b01c769c..280ddbd7 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
> > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(int fd)
> >  	char buf[256];
> >
> >  	igt_debugfs_read(fd, "i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
> > -	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n");
> > +	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
> >  }
> >
> >  static bool psr_wait_until_enabled(int fd) diff --git
> > a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > index 2b85392d..5cba4158 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > @@ -781,8 +781,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(void)
> >  	char buf[256];
> >
> >  	debugfs_read("i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
> > -	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n") &&
> > -	       strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
> > +	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
> >  }
> >
> >  static void psr_print_status(void)
> > --
> > 2.14.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > igt-dev mailing list
> > igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status
  2018-03-20 11:26   ` Lofstedt, Marta
@ 2018-03-20 11:36     ` Maarten Lankhorst
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2018-03-20 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lofstedt, Marta, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran,
	'igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org'
  Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo

Op 20-03-18 om 12:26 schreef Lofstedt, Marta:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/40137/
>
> has no failing PST frombuffer_tracking tests. So,
>
> Reviewed-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lofstedt, Marta
>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 8:30 AM
>> To: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>; igt-
>> dev@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo
>> <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Subject: RE: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update
>> check for PSR status
>>
>> I would RB this if there was some kms_frontbuffer_tracking PSR related tests
>> that was run on PW.
>>
>> Could you re-send this together with a HACK patch on fast-feedback.testlist
>> where you replace the standard tests with some kms_frontbuffer_tracking
>> PSR related tests that was hit on the bug?
>>
>> /Marta
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: igt-dev [mailto:igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
>>> Of Dhinakaran Pandiyan
>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 3:21 AM
>>> To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> Cc: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>; Vivi,
>>> Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>>> Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
>>> Update check for PSR status
>>>
>>> Kernel does not expose the "Active: " flag in edp_psr_status anymore.
>>> So test for "HW Enabled & Active bit: yes", although this isn't
>>> completely accurate either for frontbuffer tests. Let's go with this
>>> for now until the kernel exposes HW PSR status.
>>>
>>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105519
>>> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c            | 2 +-
>>>  tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 3 +--
>>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c index
>>> b01c769c..280ddbd7 100644
>>> --- a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
>>> +++ b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
>>> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(int fd)
>>>  	char buf[256];
>>>
>>>  	igt_debugfs_read(fd, "i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
>>> -	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n");
>>> +	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  static bool psr_wait_until_enabled(int fd) diff --git
>>> a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
>>> index 2b85392d..5cba4158 100644
>>> --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
>>> +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
>>> @@ -781,8 +781,7 @@ static bool psr_is_enabled(void)
>>>  	char buf[256];
>>>
>>>  	debugfs_read("i915_edp_psr_status", buf);
>>> -	return strstr(buf, "\nActive: yes\n") &&
>>> -	       strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
>>> +	return strstr(buf, "\nHW Enabled & Active bit: yes\n");
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  static void psr_print_status(void)
>>> --
>>> 2.14.1
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> igt-dev mailing list
>>> igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

Thanks, pushed.

_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-03-20 11:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-03-16  1:21 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Update check for PSR status Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-03-16  1:41 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-03-16  3:11 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork
2018-03-16  6:29 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Lofstedt, Marta
2018-03-16 16:27   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2018-03-20 11:26   ` Lofstedt, Marta
2018-03-20 11:36     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2018-03-16 16:19 ` Maarten Lankhorst

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox