Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* drm-intel-next forced update?
@ 2010-11-22 17:13 Peter Clifton
  2010-11-22 17:19 ` Chris Wilson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Clifton @ 2010-11-22 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Intel

Was this intentional?

 + a17577c...5f75377 drm-intel-next -> drm-intel/drm-intel-next  (forced update)


-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: drm-intel-next forced update?
  2010-11-22 17:13 drm-intel-next forced update? Peter Clifton
@ 2010-11-22 17:19 ` Chris Wilson
  2010-11-22 17:32   ` Peter Clifton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2010-11-22 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Clifton, Intel

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:13:21 +0000, Peter Clifton <pcjc2@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Was this intentional?
> 
>  + a17577c...5f75377 drm-intel-next -> drm-intel/drm-intel-next  (forced update)

Yes. 2 patches were moved to -fixes and I had left -next in an
inconsistent state last week (especially as I thought some major surgery
was about to be involved).
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: drm-intel-next forced update?
  2010-11-22 17:19 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2010-11-22 17:32   ` Peter Clifton
  2010-11-22 17:41     ` Chris Wilson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Clifton @ 2010-11-22 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson, Intel

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 17:19 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:13:21 +0000, Peter Clifton <pcjc2@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Was this intentional?
> > 
> >  + a17577c...5f75377 drm-intel-next -> drm-intel/drm-intel-next  (forced update)
> 
> Yes. 2 patches were moved to -fixes and I had left -next in an
> inconsistent state last week (especially as I thought some major surgery
> was about to be involved).

Ok, cool - just wanted to make sure I'd not missed anything.

I've just rebuilt (a backport) of drm-intel-next to try the fix for
tiling registers on resume. Since you added a Reported-By for me, I
guess this is the bug I saw with flash videos after resume?

Best wishes,

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: drm-intel-next forced update?
  2010-11-22 17:32   ` Peter Clifton
@ 2010-11-22 17:41     ` Chris Wilson
  2010-11-22 17:48       ` Peter Clifton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2010-11-22 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Clifton, Intel

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:32:18 +0000, Peter Clifton <pcjc2@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> I've just rebuilt (a backport) of drm-intel-next to try the fix for
> tiling registers on resume. Since you added a Reported-By for me, I
> guess this is the bug I saw with flash videos after resume?

Yes, I thought that was unlikely to be a coincidence that a bug existed
with the tiling registers upon resume and you seeing a tiling bug after
resume...

Hope it works,
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: drm-intel-next forced update?
  2010-11-22 17:41     ` Chris Wilson
@ 2010-11-22 17:48       ` Peter Clifton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Clifton @ 2010-11-22 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson, Intel

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 17:41 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:32:18 +0000, Peter Clifton <pcjc2@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> > I've just rebuilt (a backport) of drm-intel-next to try the fix for
> > tiling registers on resume. Since you added a Reported-By for me, I
> > guess this is the bug I saw with flash videos after resume?
> 
> Yes, I thought that was unlikely to be a coincidence that a bug existed
> with the tiling registers upon resume and you seeing a tiling bug after
> resume...

Tested, seems fixed with that change ;)

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-22 17:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-22 17:13 drm-intel-next forced update? Peter Clifton
2010-11-22 17:19 ` Chris Wilson
2010-11-22 17:32   ` Peter Clifton
2010-11-22 17:41     ` Chris Wilson
2010-11-22 17:48       ` Peter Clifton

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox