From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, "Kilarski,
Bernard R" <bernard.r.kilarski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: set IDICOS to medium uncore resources
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:29:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342434609_3829@CP5-2952> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120618083554.GB4773@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:35:54 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 06:58:59PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > I'm seeing about a 5% FPS improvement across various benchmarks on my
> > IVB i3. Rumor has it that the higher end parts show even more benefit.
> >
> > This derives from a patch originally given to me by Bernard. The docs
> > are confusing about the definition names (ie. medium really seems like
> > max), but it would seem it gives more cache to the GT at the expense of
> > uncore. This configuration makes the split most in favor of the GT. I've
> > not tried the other IDICOS values.
> >
> > Cc: "Kilarski, Bernard R" <bernard.r.kilarski@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> Queued for -next, with Eric's ack added. Although I've had fix the patch,
> it didn't compile :(
So this introduces a 10% (205 to 185 fps on an i7-3720qm @10x7) performance
regression on good old CPU bound padman, but one large win with alpha
compositing the same texture over and over again (fishtank 7.8s to 6.8s).
Oh well, there's plenty of overhead in mesa to recover -- reading the
profiles it is rate limited by the cpu overhead in i965_dri.so.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-16 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-05 1:58 [PATCH] drm/i915: set IDICOS to medium uncore resources Ben Widawsky
2012-05-04 20:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2012-05-04 21:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-05-07 6:02 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-05-06 3:04 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-05-07 6:51 ` Eric Anholt
2012-05-07 16:32 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-06-14 6:36 ` Eric Anholt
2012-06-18 8:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-16 10:29 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2012-07-18 16:07 ` Eric Anholt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1342434609_3829@CP5-2952 \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=bernard.r.kilarski@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox