From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>,
"Kilarski, Bernard R" <bernard.r.kilarski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: set IDICOS to medium uncore resources
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 23:51:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877gwoo55d.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336183139-10286-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4146 bytes --]
On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:58:59 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> I'm seeing about a 5% FPS improvement across various benchmarks on my
> IVB i3. Rumor has it that the higher end parts show even more benefit.
>
> This derives from a patch originally given to me by Bernard. The docs
> are confusing about the definition names (ie. medium really seems like
> max), but it would seem it gives more cache to the GT at the expense of
> uncore. This configuration makes the split most in favor of the GT. I've
> not tried the other IDICOS values.
My IVB system started with an SNBPCR value of 0x1b40. To test the effect of
this patch, I just smashed the value of the reg at runtime:
Results:
x intel_reg_write 0x900c 0x001b40
+ intel_reg_write 0x900c 0x201b40
citybench:
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| xxx + |
| x xxx + + + |
| x xxx + +++ |
| x xxx + + ++++ |
| xx xxxx + + ++++ |
|x xxx x xxxx + + ++++++ ++ |
|xxxxx xxxxxxxx + + + + +*++++ ++ |
|xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx x +++++ ++++ +*+++++++ |
|xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx x ++++++++++ ++**+++++++ + + |
|xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx *++++++++++++ ****+*++++++++ + ++++++ +|
| |___________AM_________| |_________A_M_______| |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 118 335.779 387.456 354.306 352.63131 12.462796
+ 118 367.324 419.02 386.14 384.47139 10.970918
Difference at 95.0% confidence
31.8401 +/- 2.99585
9.02928% +/- 0.849569%
(Student's t, pooled s = 11.7406)
openarena:
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| + ++ xx xx x x xx |
| + + ++ + + xxxxxxx xxxxx |
| +++ ++++++++++ ++++++ ++ + x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xx|
|++ + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + x x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xx|
| |_________A________| |_____A____| |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 65 273.5 292.2 284 283.73385 4.2561822
+ 65 234.8 263.2 249.9 249.6 6.9873323
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-34.1338 +/- 1.989
-12.0302% +/- 0.70101%
nexuiz:
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| + |
| x + + |
| + x x xx *x+ +x |
|+ + + x *x+x xxx + x++ + x+*xxxx+x***x+++*x**+x ++ *+|
| |____|____________AAM____M_____|______| |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 33 74.314888 76.177197 75.424764 75.332161 0.48205891
+ 33 73.397254 76.219868 75.584749 75.363209 0.69408523
Using these 3 tests, this patch does not look like a win. Note that OA
is the most CPU-bound of these, while nexuiz is usually on the edge
between being CPU and GPU-bound, and citybench is definitely GPU
limited.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-05 1:58 [PATCH] drm/i915: set IDICOS to medium uncore resources Ben Widawsky
2012-05-04 20:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2012-05-04 21:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-05-07 6:02 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-05-06 3:04 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-05-07 6:51 ` Eric Anholt [this message]
2012-05-07 16:32 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-06-14 6:36 ` Eric Anholt
2012-06-18 8:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-16 10:29 ` Chris Wilson
2012-07-18 16:07 ` Eric Anholt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877gwoo55d.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net \
--to=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=bernard.r.kilarski@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox