public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, "Kilarski,
	Bernard R" <bernard.r.kilarski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: set IDICOS to medium uncore resources
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 23:00:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120504210032.GI5443@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120504134027.579ea57e@jbarnes-x220>

On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 01:40:27PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri,  4 May 2012 18:58:59 -0700
> Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> 
> > I'm seeing about a 5% FPS improvement across various benchmarks on my
> > IVB i3. Rumor has it that the higher end parts show even more benefit.
> > 
> > This derives from a patch originally given to me by Bernard. The docs
> > are  confusing about the definition names (ie. medium really seems
> > like max), but it would seem it gives more cache to the GT at the
> > expense of uncore. This configuration makes the split most in favor
> > of the GT. I've not tried the other IDICOS values.
> 
> Bringing the IRC discussion here.  I think this is really at the
> expense (though not really) of the CPU, since it allows the GPU to use
> more of the shared CPU/GPU cache in the uncore.
> 
> You can fix up the #define names if you want; the MEDIUM etc may be
> from an old, incorrect doc.  They were added awhile back.

Another perk from me: Can you do some benchmarking of this for snb, too?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-04 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-05  1:58 [PATCH] drm/i915: set IDICOS to medium uncore resources Ben Widawsky
2012-05-04 20:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2012-05-04 21:00   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-05-07  6:02     ` Ben Widawsky
2012-05-06  3:04   ` Ben Widawsky
2012-05-07  6:51 ` Eric Anholt
2012-05-07 16:32   ` Ben Widawsky
2012-06-14  6:36   ` Eric Anholt
2012-06-18  8:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-16 10:29   ` Chris Wilson
2012-07-18 16:07     ` Eric Anholt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120504210032.GI5443@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
    --cc=bernard.r.kilarski@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox