From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Use eLLC/LLC by default when available
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 20:17:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130704181709.GH18285@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372960927-1112-4-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:02:06AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> DRI clients really should be using MOCS to get fine grained streaming
> cache controls. With that note, I *hope* that this patch doesn't improve
> performance overwhelmingly, because if it does - it means there is a
> problem elsewhere.
>
> In any case, the kernel, and old userspace should get some benefit from
> this, so let's do it. eLLC is always a good default, and really not
> using it is the special case for MOCS.
>
> References: http://www.intel.com/newsroom/kits/restricted/ha$well!/pdfs/4th_Gen_Intel_Core_PressBriefing_5-29.pdf (page 57)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Iris is the marketing name and likely to stick around for a bit (like HD
Graphics), I'd vote to use the codename for this thing here, i.e. crw.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 42262d0..0ff8073 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> #define HSW_CACHEABILITY_CONTROL(bits) ((((bits) & 0x7) << 1) | \
> (((bits) & 0x8) << (11 - 3)))
> #define HSW_WB_LLC_AGE0 HSW_CACHEABILITY_CONTROL(0x3)
> +#define HSW_WB_ELLC_LLC_AGE0 HSW_CACHEABILITY_CONTROL(0xb)
>
> static gen6_gtt_pte_t gen6_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
> enum i915_cache_level level)
> @@ -109,6 +110,18 @@ static gen6_gtt_pte_t hsw_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
> return pte;
> }
>
> +static gen6_gtt_pte_t iris_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
> + enum i915_cache_level level)
> +{
> + gen6_gtt_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_VALID;
> + pte |= HSW_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr);
> +
> + if (level != I915_CACHE_NONE)
> + pte |= HSW_WB_ELLC_LLC_AGE0;
> +
> + return pte;
> +}
> +
> static void gen6_write_pdes(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ppgtt->dev->dev_private;
> @@ -860,7 +873,9 @@ int i915_gem_gtt_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> } else {
> gtt->gtt_probe = gen6_gmch_probe;
> gtt->gtt_remove = gen6_gmch_remove;
> - if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
> + if (IS_HASWELL(dev) && dev_priv->ellc_size)
> + gtt->pte_encode = iris_pte_encode;
> + else if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
> gtt->pte_encode = hsw_pte_encode;
> else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
> gtt->pte_encode = byt_pte_encode;
> --
> 1.8.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-04 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-04 18:02 [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/hsw: Set correct Haswell PTE encodings Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Define some of the eLLC magic Ben Widawsky
2013-07-13 0:02 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2013-07-14 20:36 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: store eLLC size Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:42 ` [PATCH 3.5/5] drm/i915: Do eLLC detection earlier Ben Widawsky
2013-07-13 0:04 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2013-07-13 9:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-14 20:37 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-16 6:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: store eLLC size Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 18:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Use eLLC/LLC by default when available Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:17 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2013-07-04 18:40 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-13 0:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2013-07-04 18:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: debugfs entries for [e]LLC Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 18:40 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 18:46 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-09 18:35 ` Chad Versace
2013-07-09 20:16 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Add a param for eLLC size Ben Widawsky
2013-07-16 6:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-13 0:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: debugfs entries for [e]LLC Rodrigo Vivi
2013-07-13 0:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/hsw: Set correct Haswell PTE encodings Rodrigo Vivi
2013-07-14 20:34 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-15 14:16 ` Damien Lespiau
2013-07-15 14:23 ` Damien Lespiau
2013-07-15 16:54 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-16 6:00 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130704181709.GH18285@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox