From: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/hsw: Set correct Haswell PTE encodings.
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:16:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130715141655.GA1064@strange.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372960927-1112-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:02:03AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> From: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
>
> The cacheability controls have changed, and the bits have been
> rearranged in general.
>
> v2: Remove comments for snb/ivb cache leves, that's a separate change.
>
> v3: Resolve conflicts due to patch series reordering.
>
> v4: Rebased on top of Kenneth Graunke's ->pet_encode refactoring.
>
> v5: Removed eLLC bits for separate patch.
>
> In the internal repository this was:
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
--
Damien
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 66929ea..42262d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>
> /* PPGTT stuff */
> #define GEN6_GTT_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) ((addr) | (((addr) >> 28) & 0xff0))
> +#define HSW_GTT_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) ((addr) | (((addr) >> 28) & 0x7f0))
>
> #define GEN6_PDE_VALID (1 << 0)
> /* gen6+ has bit 11-4 for physical addr bit 39-32 */
> @@ -44,6 +45,14 @@
> #define GEN6_PTE_CACHE_LLC (2 << 1)
> #define GEN6_PTE_CACHE_LLC_MLC (3 << 1)
> #define GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) GEN6_GTT_ADDR_ENCODE(addr)
> +#define HSW_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) HSW_GTT_ADDR_ENCODE(addr)
> +
> +/* Cacheability Control is a 4-bit value. The low three bits are stored in *
> + * bits 3:1 of the PTE, while the fourth bit is stored in bit 11 of the PTE.
> + */
> +#define HSW_CACHEABILITY_CONTROL(bits) ((((bits) & 0x7) << 1) | \
> + (((bits) & 0x8) << (11 - 3)))
> +#define HSW_WB_LLC_AGE0 HSW_CACHEABILITY_CONTROL(0x3)
>
> static gen6_gtt_pte_t gen6_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
> enum i915_cache_level level)
> @@ -92,10 +101,10 @@ static gen6_gtt_pte_t hsw_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
> enum i915_cache_level level)
> {
> gen6_gtt_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_VALID;
> - pte |= GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr);
> + pte |= HSW_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr);
>
> if (level != I915_CACHE_NONE)
> - pte |= GEN6_PTE_CACHE_LLC;
> + pte |= HSW_WB_LLC_AGE0;
>
> return pte;
> }
> --
> 1.8.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-15 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-04 18:02 [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/hsw: Set correct Haswell PTE encodings Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Define some of the eLLC magic Ben Widawsky
2013-07-13 0:02 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2013-07-14 20:36 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: store eLLC size Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:42 ` [PATCH 3.5/5] drm/i915: Do eLLC detection earlier Ben Widawsky
2013-07-13 0:04 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2013-07-13 9:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-14 20:37 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-16 6:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: store eLLC size Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 18:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Use eLLC/LLC by default when available Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 18:40 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-13 0:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2013-07-04 18:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: debugfs entries for [e]LLC Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 18:40 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 18:46 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-09 18:35 ` Chad Versace
2013-07-09 20:16 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 18:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Add a param for eLLC size Ben Widawsky
2013-07-16 6:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-13 0:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: debugfs entries for [e]LLC Rodrigo Vivi
2013-07-13 0:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/hsw: Set correct Haswell PTE encodings Rodrigo Vivi
2013-07-14 20:34 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-15 14:16 ` Damien Lespiau [this message]
2013-07-15 14:23 ` Damien Lespiau
2013-07-15 16:54 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-16 6:00 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130715141655.GA1064@strange.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=damien.lespiau@intel.com \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox