Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Apply the PPS register unlock workaround more consistently

["Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:34:11PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Atm, we apply this workaround somewhat inconsistently at the following
> points: driver loading, LVDS init, eDP PPS init, system resume. As this
> workaround also affects registers other than PPS (timing, PLL) a more
> consistent way is to apply it early after the PPS HW context is known to
> be lost: driver loading, system resume and on VLV/CHV/BXT when turning
> on power domains.
> 
> This is needed by the next patch that removes saving/restoring of the
> PP_CONTROL register.
> 
> This also removes the incorrect programming of the workaround on HSW+
> PCH platforms which don't have the register locking mechanism.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c         |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c    | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c         |  4 +++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h        |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c       |  8 --------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c |  4 ++++
>  6 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 8cfc264..0fcd1c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1560,6 +1560,7 @@ static int i915_drm_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	i915_gem_resume(dev);
>  
>  	i915_restore_state(dev);
> +	intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
>  	intel_opregion_setup(dev_priv);
>  
>  	intel_init_pch_refclk(dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 3d5fd06..dc4e600 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -14635,6 +14635,32 @@ static bool intel_crt_present(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	int pps_num;
> +	int pps_idx;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * This w/a is needed at least on CPT/PPT, but to be sure apply it
> +	 * everywhere where registers can be write protected.
> +	 */
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 4 ||
> +	    HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv))
> +		pps_num = 1;
> +	else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv) ||
> +		 IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
> +		pps_num = 2;
> +	else
> +		pps_num = 0;

BXT shouldn't need the unlock, I think.

So I believe we just want

if (HAS_DDI())
	return;

if (VLV||CHV)
	num = 2;
else
	num = 1;

> +
> +	for (pps_idx = 0; pps_idx < pps_num; pps_idx++) {
> +		u32 val = I915_READ(PP_CONTROL(pps_idx));
> +
> +		val = (val & ~PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS;
> +		I915_WRITE(PP_CONTROL(pps_idx), val);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void intel_pps_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
> @@ -14643,6 +14669,8 @@ static void intel_pps_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		dev_priv->pps_mmio_base = VLV_PPS_BASE;
>  	else
>  		dev_priv->pps_mmio_base = PPS_BASE;
> +
> +	intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_device *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 76f5b72..b27f1c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1829,7 +1829,9 @@ static  u32 ironlake_get_pp_control(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->pps_mutex);
>  
>  	control = I915_READ(_pp_ctrl_reg(intel_dp));
> -	if (!IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
> +	if (WARN_ON((HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv) ||
> +		     IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) &&

!HAS_DDI

> +		     (control & PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) != PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS)) {
>  		control &= ~PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK;
>  		control |= PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index c29a429..cbce786 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1159,6 +1159,7 @@ void intel_mark_busy(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  void intel_mark_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  void intel_crtc_restore_mode(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
>  int intel_display_suspend(struct drm_device *dev);
> +void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  void intel_encoder_destroy(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
>  int intel_connector_init(struct intel_connector *);
>  struct intel_connector *intel_connector_alloc(void);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> index d5158e5..9a6e1ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> @@ -967,14 +967,6 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	int pipe;
>  	u8 pin;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Unlock registers and just leave them unlocked. Do this before
> -	 * checking quirk lists to avoid bogus WARNINGs.
> -	 */
> -	if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 4)
> -		I915_WRITE(PP_CONTROL(0),
> -			   I915_READ(PP_CONTROL(0)) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS);
> -
>  	if (!intel_lvds_supported(dev))
>  		return;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 1c603bb..8f51ae3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -592,6 +592,8 @@ void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling DC9\n");
>  
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
> +
> +	intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
>  }
>  
>  static void assert_csr_loaded(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -1145,6 +1147,8 @@ static void vlv_display_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	vlv_set_power_well(dev_priv, power_well, true);
>  
>  	vlv_display_power_well_init(dev_priv);
> +
> +	intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
>  }
>  
>  static void vlv_display_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx