From: Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
intel-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
Jerry Zuo <Jerry.Zuo-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>,
David Airlie <airlied-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
Juston Li <juston.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/20] drm/dp_mst: Restart last_connected_port_and_mstb() if topology ref fails
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:16:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190110091630.GD21184@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109003516.14752-8-lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 07:35:04PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> While this isn't a complete fix, this will improve the reliability of
> drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() pretty significantly during
> hotplug events, since there's a chance that the in-memory topology tree
> may not be fully updated when drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb()
> is called and thus might end up causing our search to fail on an mstb
> whose topology refcount has reached 0, but has not yet been removed from
> it's parent.
>
> Ideally, we should further fix this problem by ensuring that we deal
> with the potential for racing with a hotplug event, which would look
> like this:
>
> * drm_dp_payload_send_msg() retrieves the last living relative of mstb
> with drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb()
> * drm_dp_payload_send_msg() starts building payload message
> At the same time, mstb gets unplugged from the topology and is no
> longer the actual last living relative of the original mstb
> * drm_dp_payload_send_msg() tries sending the payload message, hub times
> out
> * Hub timed out, we give up and run away-resulting in the payload being
> leaked
>
> This could be fixed by restarting the
> drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() search whenever we get a
> timeout, sending the payload to the new mstb, then repeating until
> either the entire topology is removed from the system or
> drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() fails. But since the above
> race condition is not terribly likely, we'll address that in a later
> patch series once we've improved the recovery handling for VCPI
> allocations in the rest of the DP MST helpers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jerry Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
> Cc: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index c53cf7eb1dbc..bafc85f08606 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -2047,24 +2047,50 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_port *drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_to_mstb(struct drm
> return drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_to_mstb(mstb->port_parent->parent);
> }
>
> -static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> - struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
> - int *port_num)
> +/**
> + * drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() - Find the last living relatives
> + * in a topology of a given branch device
> + * @mgr: The topology manager to use
> + * @mstb: The disconnected branch device
> + * @port_num: Where to store the number of the last connected port
> + *
> + * Searches upwards in the topology starting from @mstb to try to find the
> + * closest available parent of @mstb that's still connected to the rest of the
> + * topology. This can be used in order to perform operations like releasing
> + * payloads, where the branch device which owned the payload may no longer be
> + * around and thus would require that the payload on the last living relative
> + * be freed instead.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * The last connected &drm_dp_mst_branch in the topology that was a parent of
> + * @mstb, if there is one.
> + */
Since this is an internal function and we don't pull it into the kerneldoc
there's a good chance the details will bitrot (since 0day won't spot when
e.g. the arguments change). It'd just keep a small explaining why we need
to do this and drop the other bits. Either way:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> +static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *
> +drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> + struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
> + int *port_num)
> {
> struct drm_dp_mst_branch *rmstb = NULL;
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *found_port;
> +
> mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
> - if (mgr->mst_primary) {
> + if (!mgr->mst_primary)
> + goto out;
> +
> + do {
> found_port = drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_to_mstb(mstb);
> + if (!found_port)
> + break;
>
> - if (found_port) {
> + if (drm_dp_mst_topology_try_get_mstb(found_port->parent)) {
> rmstb = found_port->parent;
> - if (drm_dp_mst_topology_try_get_mstb(rmstb))
> - *port_num = found_port->port_num;
> - else
> - rmstb = NULL;
> + *port_num = found_port->port_num;
> + } else {
> + /* Search again, starting from this parent */
> + mstb = found_port->parent;
> }
> - }
> + } while (!rmstb);
> +out:
> mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> return rmstb;
> }
> @@ -2113,6 +2139,14 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>
> drm_dp_queue_down_tx(mgr, txmsg);
>
> + /*
> + * FIXME: there is a small chance that between getting the last
> + * connected mstb and sending the payload message, the last connected
> + * mstb could also be removed from the topology. In the future, this
> + * needs to be fixed by restarting the
> + * drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() search in the event of a
> + * timeout if the topology is still connected to the system.
> + */
> ret = drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply(mstb, txmsg);
> if (ret > 0) {
> if (txmsg->reply.reply_type == 1)
> --
> 2.20.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-10 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 0:34 [PATCH v5 00/20] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] drm/amdgpu/display: Keep malloc ref to MST port Lyude Paul
[not found] ` <20190109003516.14752-1-lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-09 0:34 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] drm/dp_mst: Fix some formatting in drm_dp_add_port() Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:34 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] drm/dp_mst: Fix some formatting in drm_dp_payload_send_msg() Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] drm/dp_mst: Fix some formatting in drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi() Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] drm/dp_mst: Fix some formatting in drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi() Lyude Paul
[not found] ` <20190109003516.14752-5-lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-10 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] drm/dp_mst: Rename drm_dp_mst_get_validated_(port|mstb)_ref and friends Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports Lyude Paul
[not found] ` <20190109003516.14752-7-lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-10 9:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] drm/dp_mst: Restart last_connected_port_and_mstb() if topology ref fails Lyude Paul
[not found] ` <20190109003516.14752-8-lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-10 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] drm/dp_mst: Stop releasing VCPI when removing ports from topology Lyude Paul
2019-01-10 9:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] drm/dp_mst: Fix payload deallocation on hotplugs using malloc refs Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] drm/i915: Keep malloc references to MST ports Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] drm/nouveau: Remove bogus cleanup in nv50_mstm_add_connector() Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] drm/nouveau: Remove unnecessary VCPI checks in nv50_msto_cleanup() Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] drm/nouveau: Keep malloc references to MST ports Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] drm/nouveau: Stop unsetting mstc->port, use malloc refs Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] drm/nouveau: Grab payload lock in nv50_msto_payload() Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros Lyude Paul
2019-01-10 9:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations Lyude Paul
[not found] ` <20190109003516.14752-19-lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-10 9:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] drm/dp_mst: Check payload count in drm_dp_mst_atomic_check() Lyude Paul
[not found] ` <20190109003516.14752-20-lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-10 9:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-01-09 0:35 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] drm/nouveau: Use atomic VCPI helpers for MST Lyude Paul
2019-01-09 0:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup (rev5) Patchwork
2019-01-09 1:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-01-09 10:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190110091630.GD21184@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel-/w4ywyx8dfk@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Jerry.Zuo-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
--cc=airlied-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
--cc=harry.wentland-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
--cc=intel-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
--cc=juston.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox