public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: rvda is relative from opregion base, not absolute
@ 2019-01-29 13:31 Jani Nikula
  2019-01-29 13:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/opregion: rvda is relative from opregion base, not absolute (rev2) Patchwork
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2019-01-29 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: jani.nikula

We've supported the opregion RVDA/RVDS fields for VBT size >= 6 KB since
commit 04ebaadb9f2d ("drm/i915/opregion: handle VBT sizes bigger than 6
KB"). That's three years, almost to the date.

The implementation was based on spec only, in anticipation of systems
with big VBT. Now, the spec has been changed. The RVDA is supposed to be
relative from the beginning of opregion, not absolute address.

This is obviously a backward/forward incompatible change. I've been told
there are no systems out there using the field. Fingers crossed. This
will still be problematic for older kernels, and we can only try to
backport the fix.

Fix the error path while at it.

Fixes: 04ebaadb9f2d ("drm/i915/opregion: handle VBT sizes bigger than 6 KB")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
index 30ae96c5c97c..30324b963e24 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ struct opregion_asle {
 	u64 fdss;
 	u32 fdsp;
 	u32 stat;
-	u64 rvda;	/* Physical address of raw vbt data */
+	u64 rvda;	/* Address of raw vbt data, relative from opregion */
 	u32 rvds;	/* Size of raw vbt data */
 	u8 rsvd[58];
 } __packed;
@@ -954,7 +954,13 @@ int intel_opregion_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 
 	if (opregion->header->opregion_ver >= 2 && opregion->asle &&
 	    opregion->asle->rvda && opregion->asle->rvds) {
-		opregion->rvda = memremap(opregion->asle->rvda,
+		/*
+		 * rvda is unsigned, relative from opregion base, and should
+		 * never point within opregion.
+		 */
+		WARN_ON(opregion->asle->rvda < OPREGION_SIZE);
+
+		opregion->rvda = memremap(asls + opregion->asle->rvda,
 					  opregion->asle->rvds,
 					  MEMREMAP_WB);
 		vbt = opregion->rvda;
@@ -966,6 +972,8 @@ int intel_opregion_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 			goto out;
 		} else {
 			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid VBT in ACPI OpRegion (RVDA)\n");
+			memunmap(opregion->rvda);
+			opregion->rvda = NULL;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: rvda is relative from opregion base, not absolute
@ 2018-12-13 13:47 Jani Nikula
  2018-12-13 14:06 ` Jani Nikula
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2018-12-13 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Jani Nikula

We've supported the opregion RVDA/RVDS fields for VBT size >= 6 KB since
commit 04ebaadb9f2d ("drm/i915/opregion: handle VBT sizes bigger than 6
KB"). That's three years, almost to the date.

The implementation was based on spec only, in anticipation of systems
with big VBT. Now, the spec has been changed. The RVDA is supposed to be
relative from the beginning of opregion, not absolute address.

This is obviously a backward/forward incompatible change. I've been told
there are no systems out there using the field. Fingers crossed. This
will still be problematic for older kernels, and we can only try to
backport the fix.

Fixes: 04ebaadb9f2d ("drm/i915/opregion: handle VBT sizes bigger than 6 KB")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
index b8f106d9ecf8..700fddaa8d9e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct opregion_asle {
 	u64 fdss;
 	u32 fdsp;
 	u32 stat;
-	u64 rvda;	/* Physical address of raw vbt data */
+	u64 rvda;	/* Address of raw vbt data, relative from opregion */
 	u32 rvds;	/* Size of raw vbt data */
 	u8 rsvd[58];
 } __packed;
@@ -955,7 +955,13 @@ int intel_opregion_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 
 	if (opregion->header->opregion_ver >= 2 && opregion->asle &&
 	    opregion->asle->rvda && opregion->asle->rvds) {
-		opregion->rvda = memremap(opregion->asle->rvda,
+		/*
+		 * rvda is unsigned, relative from opregion base, and should
+		 * never point within opregion.
+		 */
+		WARN_ON(opregion->asle->rvda < OPREGION_SIZE);
+
+		opregion->rvda = memremap(asls + opregion->asle->rvda,
 					  opregion->asle->rvds,
 					  MEMREMAP_WB);
 		vbt = opregion->rvda;
@@ -967,6 +973,8 @@ int intel_opregion_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 			goto out;
 		} else {
 			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid VBT in ACPI OpRegion (RVDA)\n");
+			memunmap(opregion->rvda);
+			opregion->rvda = NULL;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-31 11:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-29 13:31 [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: rvda is relative from opregion base, not absolute Jani Nikula
2019-01-29 13:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/opregion: rvda is relative from opregion base, not absolute (rev2) Patchwork
2019-01-31  8:24 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: rvda is relative from opregion base, not absolute Ville Syrjälä
2019-01-31  9:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/opregion: rvda is relative from opregion base, not absolute (rev3) Patchwork
2019-01-31 11:51 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: rvda is relative from opregion base, not absolute Jani Nikula
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-13 13:47 Jani Nikula
2018-12-13 14:06 ` Jani Nikula

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox