From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/23] drm/i915: Sanitize the TypeC connect/detect sequences
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 17:58:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604145826.16424-13-imre.deak@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190604145826.16424-1-imre.deak@intel.com>
Make the order during detection more consistent: first reset the TypeC
port mode if needed (adding new helpers for this), then detect any
connected sink.
To check if a port mode reset is needed determine first the target port
mode based on the live status if a sink is already connected or the
PHY status complete flag otherwise.
Add a WARN in legacy mode if unexpectedly we can't set the unsafe mode
or if the FIA doesn't provide the 4 lanes required.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tc.c | 104 +++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tc.c
index d91381c0e87d..9832e2ddb92e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tc.c
@@ -188,43 +188,46 @@ static bool icl_tc_phy_set_safe_mode(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
* will require a lot of coordination with user space and thorough testing for
* the extra possible cases.
*/
-static bool icl_tc_phy_connect(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
+static void icl_tc_phy_connect(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, dig_port->base.port);
- u32 live_status_mask;
-
- if (dig_port->tc_mode != TC_PORT_LEGACY &&
- dig_port->tc_mode != TC_PORT_DP_ALT)
- return true;
if (!icl_tc_phy_status_complete(dig_port)) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %s: PHY not ready\n",
tc_port_name(dev_priv, tc_port));
- WARN_ON(dig_port->tc_legacy_port);
- return false;
+ goto out_set_tbt_alt_mode;
}
- if (!icl_tc_phy_set_safe_mode(dig_port, false))
- return false;
+ if (!icl_tc_phy_set_safe_mode(dig_port, false) &&
+ !WARN_ON(dig_port->tc_legacy_port))
+ goto out_set_tbt_alt_mode;
- if (dig_port->tc_mode == TC_PORT_LEGACY)
- return true;
+ if (dig_port->tc_legacy_port) {
+ WARN_ON(intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(dig_port) != 4);
+ dig_port->tc_mode = TC_PORT_LEGACY;
- live_status_mask = tc_port_live_status_mask(dig_port);
+ return;
+ }
/*
* Now we have to re-check the live state, in case the port recently
* became disconnected. Not necessary for legacy mode.
*/
- if (!(live_status_mask & BIT(TC_PORT_DP_ALT))) {
+ if (!(tc_port_live_status_mask(dig_port) & BIT(TC_PORT_DP_ALT))) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %s: PHY sudden disconnect\n",
tc_port_name(dev_priv, tc_port));
- icl_tc_phy_disconnect(dig_port);
- return false;
+ goto out_set_safe_mode;
}
- return true;
+ dig_port->tc_mode = TC_PORT_DP_ALT;
+
+ return;
+
+out_set_safe_mode:
+ icl_tc_phy_set_safe_mode(dig_port, true);
+out_set_tbt_alt_mode:
+ dig_port->tc_mode = TC_PORT_TBT_ALT;
}
/*
@@ -233,9 +236,6 @@ static bool icl_tc_phy_connect(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
*/
void icl_tc_phy_disconnect(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
- enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, dig_port->base.port);
-
switch (dig_port->tc_mode) {
case TC_PORT_LEGACY:
case TC_PORT_DP_ALT:
@@ -248,31 +248,41 @@ void icl_tc_phy_disconnect(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
default:
MISSING_CASE(dig_port->tc_mode);
}
-
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %s: mode %s disconnected\n",
- tc_port_name(dev_priv, tc_port),
- tc_port_mode_name(dig_port->tc_mode));
}
-static void icl_update_tc_port_type(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
- u32 live_status_mask)
+static enum tc_port_mode
+intel_tc_port_get_target_mode(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
{
- enum port port = intel_dig_port->base.port;
- enum tc_port_mode old_mode = intel_dig_port->tc_mode;
+ u32 live_status_mask = tc_port_live_status_mask(dig_port);
- if (!live_status_mask)
- return;
+ if (live_status_mask)
+ return fls(live_status_mask) - 1;
+
+ return icl_tc_phy_status_complete(dig_port) &&
+ dig_port->tc_legacy_port ? TC_PORT_LEGACY :
+ TC_PORT_TBT_ALT;
+}
- intel_dig_port->tc_mode = fls(live_status_mask) - 1;
+static void intel_tc_port_reset_mode(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
+ enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, dig_port->base.port);
+ enum tc_port_mode old_tc_mode = dig_port->tc_mode;
- if (old_mode != intel_dig_port->tc_mode)
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %s: port has mode %s\n",
- tc_port_name(dev_priv,
- intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, port)),
- tc_port_mode_name(intel_dig_port->tc_mode));
+ icl_tc_phy_disconnect(dig_port);
+ icl_tc_phy_connect(dig_port);
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %s: TC port mode reset (%s -> %s)\n",
+ tc_port_name(dev_priv, tc_port),
+ tc_port_mode_name(old_tc_mode),
+ tc_port_mode_name(dig_port->tc_mode));
}
+static bool
+intel_tc_port_needs_reset(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
+{
+ return intel_tc_port_get_target_mode(dig_port) != dig_port->tc_mode;
+}
/*
* The type-C ports are different because even when they are connected, they may
@@ -286,23 +296,9 @@ static void icl_update_tc_port_type(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
*/
bool intel_tc_port_connected(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
- u32 live_status_mask = tc_port_live_status_mask(dig_port);
+ if (intel_tc_port_needs_reset(dig_port))
+ intel_tc_port_reset_mode(dig_port);
- /*
- * The spec says we shouldn't be using the ISR bits for detecting
- * between TC and TBT. We should use DFLEXDPSP.
- */
- if (!live_status_mask && !dig_port->tc_legacy_port) {
- icl_tc_phy_disconnect(dig_port);
-
- return false;
- }
-
- icl_update_tc_port_type(dev_priv, dig_port, live_status_mask);
- if (!icl_tc_phy_connect(dig_port))
- return false;
-
- return true;
+ return tc_port_live_status_mask(dig_port) & BIT(dig_port->tc_mode);
}
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-04 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-04 14:58 [PATCH 00/23] drm/i915: Fix TypeC port mode switching Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 01/23] drm/i915/icl: Add support to read out the TBT PLL HW state Imre Deak
2019-06-07 17:36 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 02/23] drm/i915: Tune down WARNs about TBT AUX power well enabling Imre Deak
2019-06-07 17:50 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-08 13:33 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 03/23] drm/i915: Move the TypeC port handling code to a separate file Imre Deak
2019-06-06 8:42 ` Jani Nikula
2019-06-06 8:43 ` Jani Nikula
2019-06-06 9:09 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-10 22:57 ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-11 10:01 ` Jani Nikula
2019-06-07 17:56 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 04/23] drm/i915: Sanitize the terminology used for TypeC port modes Imre Deak
2019-06-07 19:15 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-08 13:43 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-10 23:21 ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-06-11 11:19 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 05/23] drm/i915: Don't enable the DDI-IO power in the TypeC TBT-alt mode Imre Deak
2019-06-07 19:23 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 06/23] drm/i915: Fix the TBT AUX power well enabling Imre Deak
2019-06-07 19:58 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-08 13:55 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 07/23] drm/i915: Use the correct AUX power domain in TypeC TBT-alt mode Imre Deak
2019-06-07 20:02 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 08/23] drm/i915: Unify the TypeC port notation in debug/error messages Imre Deak
2019-06-07 20:21 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-07 20:42 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-07 20:45 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-07 20:46 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 09/23] drm/i915: Factor out common parts from TypeC port handling functions Imre Deak
2019-06-06 8:47 ` Jani Nikula
2019-06-06 9:19 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-07 21:22 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-08 17:23 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-18 16:33 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-06-18 16:44 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 10/23] drm/i915: Wait for TypeC PHY complete flag to clear in safe mode Imre Deak
2019-06-07 21:32 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: Handle the TCCOLD power-down event Imre Deak
2019-06-07 21:41 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-08 17:31 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2019-06-07 22:15 ` [PATCH 12/23] drm/i915: Sanitize the TypeC connect/detect sequences Souza, Jose
2019-06-08 17:40 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 13/23] drm/i915: Fix the TypeC port mode sanitization during loading/resume Imre Deak
2019-06-07 22:39 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-08 17:50 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 14/23] drm/i915: Keep the TypeC port mode fixed for detect/AUX transfers Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 15/23] drm/i915: Sanitize the TypeC FIA lane configuration decoding Imre Deak
2019-06-07 22:49 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-18 16:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-06-18 16:46 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 16/23] drm/i915: Sanitize the shared DPLL reserve/release interface Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 17/23] drm/i915: Sanitize the shared DPLL find/reference interface Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 18/23] drm/i915/icl: Split getting the DPLLs to port type specific functions Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 19/23] drm/i915/icl: Reserve all required PLLs for TypeC ports Imre Deak
2019-06-07 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2019-06-18 17:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-06-18 18:02 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 20/23] drm/i915: Keep the TypeC port mode fixed when the port is active Imre Deak
2019-06-19 12:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-06-19 16:08 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 21/23] drm/i915: Add state verification for the TypeC port mode Imre Deak
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 22/23] drm/i915: Remove unneeded disconnect in TypeC legacy " Imre Deak
2019-06-08 0:18 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-04 14:58 ` [PATCH 23/23] drm/i915: WARN about invalid lane reversal in TBT-alt/DP-alt modes Imre Deak
2019-06-08 0:13 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-08 0:25 ` Souza, Jose
2019-06-04 17:30 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Fix TypeC port mode switching Patchwork
2019-06-04 17:39 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-06-05 5:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-06-05 16:36 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-06-07 17:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Fix TypeC port mode switching (rev2) Patchwork
2019-06-07 18:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-06-07 18:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-06-10 12:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190604145826.16424-13-imre.deak@intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox