From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/24] drm/i915: Add ww context handling to context_barrier_task
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:30:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810103103.303818-12-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810103103.303818-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
This is required if we want to pass a ww context in intel_context_pin
and gen6_ppgtt_pin().
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c | 55 ++++++++++++++-----
.../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 22 +++-----
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
index db893f6c516b..34c8b0dd85e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -1106,6 +1106,7 @@ I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(static intel_engine_mask_t context_barrier_inject_fault);
static int context_barrier_task(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
intel_engine_mask_t engines,
bool (*skip)(struct intel_context *ce, void *data),
+ int (*pin)(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww, void *data),
int (*emit)(struct i915_request *rq, void *data),
void (*task)(void *data),
void *data)
@@ -1113,6 +1114,7 @@ static int context_barrier_task(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
struct context_barrier_task *cb;
struct i915_gem_engines_iter it;
struct i915_gem_engines *e;
+ struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
struct intel_context *ce;
int err = 0;
@@ -1150,10 +1152,21 @@ static int context_barrier_task(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
if (skip && skip(ce, data))
continue;
- rq = intel_context_create_request(ce);
+ i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
+retry:
+ err = intel_context_pin(ce);
+ if (err)
+ goto err;
+
+ if (pin)
+ err = pin(ce, &ww, data);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_unpin;
+
+ rq = i915_request_create(ce);
if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
err = PTR_ERR(rq);
- break;
+ goto err_unpin;
}
err = 0;
@@ -1163,6 +1176,16 @@ static int context_barrier_task(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
err = i915_active_add_request(&cb->base, rq);
i915_request_add(rq);
+err_unpin:
+ intel_context_unpin(ce);
+err:
+ if (err == -EDEADLK) {
+ err = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
+ if (!err)
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&ww);
+
if (err)
break;
}
@@ -1218,6 +1241,17 @@ static void set_ppgtt_barrier(void *data)
i915_vm_close(old);
}
+static int pin_ppgtt_update(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww, void *data)
+{
+ struct i915_address_space *vm = ce->vm;
+
+ if (!HAS_LOGICAL_RING_CONTEXTS(vm->i915))
+ /* ppGTT is not part of the legacy context image */
+ return gen6_ppgtt_pin(i915_vm_to_ppgtt(vm));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int emit_ppgtt_update(struct i915_request *rq, void *data)
{
struct i915_address_space *vm = rq->context->vm;
@@ -1274,20 +1308,10 @@ static int emit_ppgtt_update(struct i915_request *rq, void *data)
static bool skip_ppgtt_update(struct intel_context *ce, void *data)
{
- if (!test_bit(CONTEXT_ALLOC_BIT, &ce->flags))
- return true;
-
if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_CONTEXTS(ce->engine->i915))
- return false;
-
- if (!atomic_read(&ce->pin_count))
- return true;
-
- /* ppGTT is not part of the legacy context image */
- if (gen6_ppgtt_pin(i915_vm_to_ppgtt(ce->vm)))
- return true;
-
- return false;
+ return !ce->state;
+ else
+ return !atomic_read(&ce->pin_count);
}
static int set_ppgtt(struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv,
@@ -1338,6 +1362,7 @@ static int set_ppgtt(struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv,
*/
err = context_barrier_task(ctx, ALL_ENGINES,
skip_ppgtt_update,
+ pin_ppgtt_update,
emit_ppgtt_update,
set_ppgtt_barrier,
old);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
index 9160a335c684..fa40006b453a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -1920,8 +1920,8 @@ static int mock_context_barrier(void *arg)
return -ENOMEM;
counter = 0;
- err = context_barrier_task(ctx, 0,
- NULL, NULL, mock_barrier_task, &counter);
+ err = context_barrier_task(ctx, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ mock_barrier_task, &counter);
if (err) {
pr_err("Failed at line %d, err=%d\n", __LINE__, err);
goto out;
@@ -1933,11 +1933,8 @@ static int mock_context_barrier(void *arg)
}
counter = 0;
- err = context_barrier_task(ctx, ALL_ENGINES,
- skip_unused_engines,
- NULL,
- mock_barrier_task,
- &counter);
+ err = context_barrier_task(ctx, ALL_ENGINES, skip_unused_engines,
+ NULL, NULL, mock_barrier_task, &counter);
if (err) {
pr_err("Failed at line %d, err=%d\n", __LINE__, err);
goto out;
@@ -1957,8 +1954,8 @@ static int mock_context_barrier(void *arg)
counter = 0;
context_barrier_inject_fault = BIT(RCS0);
- err = context_barrier_task(ctx, ALL_ENGINES,
- NULL, NULL, mock_barrier_task, &counter);
+ err = context_barrier_task(ctx, ALL_ENGINES, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ mock_barrier_task, &counter);
context_barrier_inject_fault = 0;
if (err == -ENXIO)
err = 0;
@@ -1972,11 +1969,8 @@ static int mock_context_barrier(void *arg)
goto out;
counter = 0;
- err = context_barrier_task(ctx, ALL_ENGINES,
- skip_unused_engines,
- NULL,
- mock_barrier_task,
- &counter);
+ err = context_barrier_task(ctx, ALL_ENGINES, skip_unused_engines,
+ NULL, NULL, mock_barrier_task, &counter);
if (err) {
pr_err("Failed at line %d, err=%d\n", __LINE__, err);
goto out;
--
2.28.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-10 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 10:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/24] drm/i915: Correct the locking hierarchy in gem Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 9:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-11 12:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-12 7:56 ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/24] drm/i915: Revert relocation chaining commits Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 12:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 13:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 15:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-12 21:29 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/24] drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/24] drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 17:41 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/24] drm/i915: Parse command buffer earlier in eb_relocate(slow) Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 17:44 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/24] drm/i915: Use per object locking in execbuf, v12 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:59 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 12:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 14:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] dummy empty commit Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 14:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-11 11:56 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/24] drm/i915: Use ww locking in intel_renderstate Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 7:52 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2020-08-11 8:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/24] drm/i915: Add ww context handling to context_barrier_task Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/24] drm/i915: Nuke arguments to eb_pin_engine Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 8:12 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/24] drm/i915: Pin engine before pinning all objects, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:01 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/24] drm/i915: Rework intel_context pinning to do everything outside of pin_mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:14 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 10:38 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/24] drm/i915: Make sure execbuffer always passes ww state to i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:32 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-12 20:28 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 11:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/24] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object/client_blt.c to use ww locking as well, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:39 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/24] drm/i915: Kill last user of intel_context_create_request outside of selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:41 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/24] drm/i915: Convert i915_perf to ww locking as well Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:53 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 11:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/24] drm/i915: Dirty hack to fix selftests locking inversion Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:58 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/24] drm/i915/selftests: Fix locking inversion in lrc selftest Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:59 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/24] drm/i915: Use ww pinning for intel_context_create_request() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:02 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/24] drm/i915: Move i915_vma_lock in the selftests to avoid lock inversion, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:09 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/24] drm/i915: Add ww locking to vm_fault_gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:16 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/24] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:31 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Correct the locking hierarchy in gem Patchwork
2020-08-10 10:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-08-10 11:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-08-11 8:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/24] " Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200810103103.303818-12-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox