Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/24] drm/i915: Revert relocation chaining commits.
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:41:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811124157.GC2352366@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810103103.303818-3-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:30:41PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This reverts commit 964a9b0f611ee ("drm/i915/gem: Use chained reloc batches")
> and commit 0e97fbb080553 ("drm/i915/gem: Use a single chained reloc batches
> for a single execbuf").
> 
> When adding ww locking to execbuf, it's hard enough to deal with a
> single BO that is part of relocation execution. Chaining is hard to
> get right, and with GPU relocation deprecated, it's best to drop this
> altogether, instead of trying to fix something we will remove.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    | 171 ++++--------------
>  .../i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_execbuffer.c  |   8 +-
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index c6a613d92a13..6acbd08f82f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -276,9 +276,7 @@ struct i915_execbuffer {
>  		bool has_fence : 1;
>  		bool needs_unfenced : 1;
>  
> -		struct i915_vma *target;
>  		struct i915_request *rq;
> -		struct i915_vma *rq_vma;
>  		u32 *rq_cmd;
>  		unsigned int rq_size;
>  	} reloc_cache;
> @@ -973,7 +971,7 @@ static void reloc_cache_init(struct reloc_cache *cache,
>  	cache->needs_unfenced = INTEL_INFO(i915)->unfenced_needs_alignment;
>  	cache->node.flags = 0;
>  	cache->rq = NULL;
> -	cache->target = NULL;
> +	cache->rq_size = 0;

This hunk is from e3d291301f99 ("drm/i915/gem: Implement legacy
MI_STORE_DATA_IMM") and reverted here, needed to not totally break the
selftest. Which this patch also updates aside from just the 2 reverts.
Otherwise this seems to match the reconstruted revert I've done here.

Please mention that in the commit message, with that:

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>



>  }
>  
>  static inline void *unmask_page(unsigned long p)
> @@ -995,122 +993,29 @@ static inline struct i915_ggtt *cache_to_ggtt(struct reloc_cache *cache)
>  	return &i915->ggtt;
>  }
>  
> -#define RELOC_TAIL 4
> -
> -static int reloc_gpu_chain(struct reloc_cache *cache)
> +static void reloc_gpu_flush(struct reloc_cache *cache)
>  {
> -	struct intel_gt_buffer_pool_node *pool;
> -	struct i915_request *rq = cache->rq;
> -	struct i915_vma *batch;
> -	u32 *cmd;
> -	int err;
> -
> -	pool = intel_gt_get_buffer_pool(rq->engine->gt, PAGE_SIZE);
> -	if (IS_ERR(pool))
> -		return PTR_ERR(pool);
> -
> -	batch = i915_vma_instance(pool->obj, rq->context->vm, NULL);
> -	if (IS_ERR(batch)) {
> -		err = PTR_ERR(batch);
> -		goto out_pool;
> -	}
> -
> -	err = i915_vma_pin(batch, 0, 0, PIN_USER | PIN_NONBLOCK);
> -	if (err)
> -		goto out_pool;
> -
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(cache->rq_size + RELOC_TAIL > PAGE_SIZE  / sizeof(u32));
> -	cmd = cache->rq_cmd + cache->rq_size;
> -	*cmd++ = MI_ARB_CHECK;
> -	if (cache->gen >= 8)
> -		*cmd++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START_GEN8;
> -	else if (cache->gen >= 6)
> -		*cmd++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START;
> -	else
> -		*cmd++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | MI_BATCH_GTT;
> -	*cmd++ = lower_32_bits(batch->node.start);
> -	*cmd++ = upper_32_bits(batch->node.start); /* Always 0 for gen<8 */
> -	i915_gem_object_flush_map(cache->rq_vma->obj);
> -	i915_gem_object_unpin_map(cache->rq_vma->obj);
> -	cache->rq_vma = NULL;
> -
> -	err = intel_gt_buffer_pool_mark_active(pool, rq);
> -	if (err == 0) {
> -		i915_vma_lock(batch);
> -		err = i915_request_await_object(rq, batch->obj, false);
> -		if (err == 0)
> -			err = i915_vma_move_to_active(batch, rq, 0);
> -		i915_vma_unlock(batch);
> -	}
> -	i915_vma_unpin(batch);
> -	if (err)
> -		goto out_pool;
> +	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = cache->rq->batch->obj;
>  
> -	cmd = i915_gem_object_pin_map(batch->obj,
> -				      cache->has_llc ?
> -				      I915_MAP_FORCE_WB :
> -				      I915_MAP_FORCE_WC);
> -	if (IS_ERR(cmd)) {
> -		err = PTR_ERR(cmd);
> -		goto out_pool;
> -	}
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(cache->rq_size >= obj->base.size / sizeof(u32));
> +	cache->rq_cmd[cache->rq_size] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
>  
> -	/* Return with batch mapping (cmd) still pinned */
> -	cache->rq_cmd = cmd;
> -	cache->rq_size = 0;
> -	cache->rq_vma = batch;
> +	__i915_gem_object_flush_map(obj, 0, sizeof(u32) * (cache->rq_size + 1));
> +	i915_gem_object_unpin_map(obj);
>  
> -out_pool:
> -	intel_gt_buffer_pool_put(pool);
> -	return err;
> -}
> +	intel_gt_chipset_flush(cache->rq->engine->gt);
>  
> -static unsigned int reloc_bb_flags(const struct reloc_cache *cache)
> -{
> -	return cache->gen > 5 ? 0 : I915_DISPATCH_SECURE;
> -}
> -
> -static int reloc_gpu_flush(struct reloc_cache *cache)
> -{
> -	struct i915_request *rq;
> -	int err;
> -
> -	rq = fetch_and_zero(&cache->rq);
> -	if (!rq)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	if (cache->rq_vma) {
> -		struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = cache->rq_vma->obj;
> -
> -		GEM_BUG_ON(cache->rq_size >= obj->base.size / sizeof(u32));
> -		cache->rq_cmd[cache->rq_size++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> -
> -		__i915_gem_object_flush_map(obj,
> -					    0, sizeof(u32) * cache->rq_size);
> -		i915_gem_object_unpin_map(obj);
> -	}
> -
> -	err = 0;
> -	if (rq->engine->emit_init_breadcrumb)
> -		err = rq->engine->emit_init_breadcrumb(rq);
> -	if (!err)
> -		err = rq->engine->emit_bb_start(rq,
> -						rq->batch->node.start,
> -						PAGE_SIZE,
> -						reloc_bb_flags(cache));
> -	if (err)
> -		i915_request_set_error_once(rq, err);
> -
> -	intel_gt_chipset_flush(rq->engine->gt);
> -	i915_request_add(rq);
> -
> -	return err;
> +	i915_request_add(cache->rq);
> +	cache->rq = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static void reloc_cache_reset(struct reloc_cache *cache)
>  {
>  	void *vaddr;
>  
> +	if (cache->rq)
> +		reloc_gpu_flush(cache);
> +
>  	if (!cache->vaddr)
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -1309,6 +1214,7 @@ static int reloc_move_to_gpu(struct i915_request *rq, struct i915_vma *vma)
>  
>  static int __reloc_gpu_alloc(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  			     struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> +			     struct i915_vma *vma,
>  			     unsigned int len)
>  {
>  	struct reloc_cache *cache = &eb->reloc_cache;
> @@ -1331,7 +1237,7 @@ static int __reloc_gpu_alloc(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  		goto out_pool;
>  	}
>  
> -	batch = i915_vma_instance(pool->obj, eb->context->vm, NULL);
> +	batch = i915_vma_instance(pool->obj, vma->vm, NULL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(batch)) {
>  		err = PTR_ERR(batch);
>  		goto err_unmap;
> @@ -1367,6 +1273,16 @@ static int __reloc_gpu_alloc(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  	if (err)
>  		goto err_request;
>  
> +	err = reloc_move_to_gpu(rq, vma);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_request;
> +
> +	err = eb->engine->emit_bb_start(rq,
> +					batch->node.start, PAGE_SIZE,
> +					cache->gen > 5 ? 0 : I915_DISPATCH_SECURE);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto skip_request;
> +
>  	i915_vma_lock(batch);
>  	err = i915_request_await_object(rq, batch->obj, false);
>  	if (err == 0)
> @@ -1381,7 +1297,6 @@ static int __reloc_gpu_alloc(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  	cache->rq = rq;
>  	cache->rq_cmd = cmd;
>  	cache->rq_size = 0;
> -	cache->rq_vma = batch;
>  
>  	/* Return with batch mapping (cmd) still pinned */
>  	goto out_pool;
> @@ -1410,9 +1325,12 @@ static u32 *reloc_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  {
>  	struct reloc_cache *cache = &eb->reloc_cache;
>  	u32 *cmd;
> -	int err;
> +
> +	if (cache->rq_size > PAGE_SIZE/sizeof(u32) - (len + 1))
> +		reloc_gpu_flush(cache);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!cache->rq)) {
> +		int err;
>  		struct intel_engine_cs *engine = eb->engine;
>  
>  		if (!reloc_can_use_engine(engine)) {
> @@ -1421,31 +1339,11 @@ static u32 *reloc_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  				return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>  		}
>  
> -		err = __reloc_gpu_alloc(eb, engine, len);
> +		err = __reloc_gpu_alloc(eb, engine, vma, len);
>  		if (unlikely(err))
>  			return ERR_PTR(err);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (vma != cache->target) {
> -		err = reloc_move_to_gpu(cache->rq, vma);
> -		if (unlikely(err)) {
> -			i915_request_set_error_once(cache->rq, err);
> -			return ERR_PTR(err);
> -		}
> -
> -		cache->target = vma;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (unlikely(cache->rq_size + len >
> -		     PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(u32) - RELOC_TAIL)) {
> -		err = reloc_gpu_chain(cache);
> -		if (unlikely(err)) {
> -			i915_request_set_error_once(cache->rq, err);
> -			return ERR_PTR(err);
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(cache->rq_size + len >= PAGE_SIZE  / sizeof(u32));
>  	cmd = cache->rq_cmd + cache->rq_size;
>  	cache->rq_size += len;
>  
> @@ -1793,20 +1691,15 @@ static int eb_relocate(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  	/* The objects are in their final locations, apply the relocations. */
>  	if (eb->args->flags & __EXEC_HAS_RELOC) {
>  		struct eb_vma *ev;
> -		int flush;
>  
>  		list_for_each_entry(ev, &eb->relocs, reloc_link) {
>  			err = eb_relocate_vma(eb, ev);
>  			if (err)
> -				break;
> +				return err;
>  		}
> -
> -		flush = reloc_gpu_flush(&eb->reloc_cache);
> -		if (!err)
> -			err = flush;
>  	}
>  
> -	return err;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index a49016f8ee0d..580884cffec3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -53,13 +53,13 @@ static int __igt_gpu_reloc(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Skip to the end of the cmd page */
> -	i = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(u32) - RELOC_TAIL - 1;
> +	i = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(u32) - 1;
>  	i -= eb->reloc_cache.rq_size;
>  	memset32(eb->reloc_cache.rq_cmd + eb->reloc_cache.rq_size,
>  		 MI_NOOP, i);
>  	eb->reloc_cache.rq_size += i;
>  
> -	/* Force batch chaining */
> +	/* Force next batch */
>  	if (!__reloc_entry_gpu(eb, vma,
>  			       offsets[2] * sizeof(u32),
>  			       2)) {
> @@ -69,9 +69,7 @@ static int __igt_gpu_reloc(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!eb->reloc_cache.rq);
>  	rq = i915_request_get(eb->reloc_cache.rq);
> -	err = reloc_gpu_flush(&eb->reloc_cache);
> -	if (err)
> -		goto put_rq;
> +	reloc_gpu_flush(&eb->reloc_cache);
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(eb->reloc_cache.rq);
>  
>  	err = i915_gem_object_wait(obj, I915_WAIT_INTERRUPTIBLE, HZ / 2);
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-10 10:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/24] drm/i915: Correct the locking hierarchy in gem Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11  9:33   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-11 12:11   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-12  7:56   ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/24] drm/i915: Revert relocation chaining commits Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 12:41   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 13:39   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 15:12   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-12 21:29   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/24] drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/24] drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 17:41   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/24] drm/i915: Parse command buffer earlier in eb_relocate(slow) Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 17:44   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/24] drm/i915: Use per object locking in execbuf, v12 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:59   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 12:58   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 14:18   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] dummy empty commit Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 14:58   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11  7:34   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-11 11:56     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/24] drm/i915: Use ww locking in intel_renderstate Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11  7:52   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/24] drm/i915: Add ww context handling to context_barrier_task Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11  8:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/24] drm/i915: Nuke arguments to eb_pin_engine Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11  8:12   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/24] drm/i915: Pin engine before pinning all objects, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:01   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/24] drm/i915: Rework intel_context pinning to do everything outside of pin_mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:14   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 10:38     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/24] drm/i915: Make sure execbuffer always passes ww state to i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:32   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-12 20:28     ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 11:54     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/24] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object/client_blt.c to use ww locking as well, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:39   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/24] drm/i915: Kill last user of intel_context_create_request outside of selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:41   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/24] drm/i915: Convert i915_perf to ww locking as well Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:53   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 11:57     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/24] drm/i915: Dirty hack to fix selftests locking inversion Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:58   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/24] drm/i915/selftests: Fix locking inversion in lrc selftest Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:59   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/24] drm/i915: Use ww pinning for intel_context_create_request() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:02   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/24] drm/i915: Move i915_vma_lock in the selftests to avoid lock inversion, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/24] drm/i915: Add ww locking to vm_fault_gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:16   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/24] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:31   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Correct the locking hierarchy in gem Patchwork
2020-08-10 10:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-08-10 11:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-08-11  8:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/24] " Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200811124157.GC2352366@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox