Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation"
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:12:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811151200.GE2352366@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810103103.303818-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:30:43PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This reverts commit 0f1dd02295f35dcdcbaafcbcbbec0753884ab974.

Needs some help with dim cite.

> With the WW locking, we will drop all references only at the
> end, so refcounting can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

The patch isn't a 1:1 revert, we've lost 3 lines in eb_move_to_gpu, but I
convinved myself that the cleanup path calling eb_release_vmas will take
care of that too, and hence this is a legit simplification. I guess maybe
wrongly squashed in change from one of the later patches, iirc. we've
discussed that there months ago.

Anyway, with the commit message ammended this is:

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    | 124 +++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 12a130f92e72..7051af5ad8d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -41,11 +41,6 @@ struct eb_vma {
>  	u32 handle;
>  };
>  
> -struct eb_vma_array {
> -	struct kref kref;
> -	struct eb_vma vma[];
> -};
> -
>  enum {
>  	FORCE_CPU_RELOC = 1,
>  	FORCE_GTT_RELOC,
> @@ -58,6 +53,7 @@ enum {
>  #define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP		BIT(29)
>  #define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS	BIT(28)
>  #define __EXEC_OBJECT_INTERNAL_FLAGS	(~0u << 28) /* all of the above */
> +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_RESERVED (__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN | __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE)
>  
>  #define __EXEC_HAS_RELOC	BIT(31)
>  #define __EXEC_INTERNAL_FLAGS	(~0u << 31)
> @@ -295,7 +291,6 @@ struct i915_execbuffer {
>  	 */
>  	int lut_size;
>  	struct hlist_head *buckets; /** ht for relocation handles */
> -	struct eb_vma_array *array;
>  
>  	struct eb_fence *fences;
>  	unsigned long num_fences;
> @@ -308,62 +303,8 @@ static inline bool eb_use_cmdparser(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  		 eb->args->batch_len);
>  }
>  
> -static struct eb_vma_array *eb_vma_array_create(unsigned int count)
> -{
> -	struct eb_vma_array *arr;
> -
> -	arr = kvmalloc(struct_size(arr, vma, count), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> -	if (!arr)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	kref_init(&arr->kref);
> -	arr->vma[0].vma = NULL;
> -
> -	return arr;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void eb_unreserve_vma(struct eb_vma *ev)
> -{
> -	struct i915_vma *vma = ev->vma;
> -
> -	if (unlikely(ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE))
> -		__i915_vma_unpin_fence(vma);
> -
> -	if (ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN)
> -		__i915_vma_unpin(vma);
> -
> -	ev->flags &= ~(__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN |
> -		       __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE);
> -}
> -
> -static void eb_vma_array_destroy(struct kref *kref)
> -{
> -	struct eb_vma_array *arr = container_of(kref, typeof(*arr), kref);
> -	struct eb_vma *ev = arr->vma;
> -
> -	while (ev->vma) {
> -		eb_unreserve_vma(ev);
> -		i915_vma_put(ev->vma);
> -		ev++;
> -	}
> -
> -	kvfree(arr);
> -}
> -
> -static void eb_vma_array_put(struct eb_vma_array *arr)
> -{
> -	kref_put(&arr->kref, eb_vma_array_destroy);
> -}
> -
>  static int eb_create(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  {
> -	/* Allocate an extra slot for use by the command parser + sentinel */
> -	eb->array = eb_vma_array_create(eb->buffer_count + 2);
> -	if (!eb->array)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	eb->vma = eb->array->vma;
> -
>  	if (!(eb->args->flags & I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT)) {
>  		unsigned int size = 1 + ilog2(eb->buffer_count);
>  
> @@ -397,10 +338,8 @@ static int eb_create(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  				break;
>  		} while (--size);
>  
> -		if (unlikely(!size)) {
> -			eb_vma_array_put(eb->array);
> +		if (unlikely(!size))
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> -		}
>  
>  		eb->lut_size = size;
>  	} else {
> @@ -511,6 +450,26 @@ eb_pin_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  	return !eb_vma_misplaced(entry, vma, ev->flags);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void __eb_unreserve_vma(struct i915_vma *vma, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!(flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN));
> +
> +	if (unlikely(flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE))
> +		__i915_vma_unpin_fence(vma);
> +
> +	__i915_vma_unpin(vma);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +eb_unreserve_vma(struct eb_vma *ev)
> +{
> +	if (!(ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN))
> +		return;
> +
> +	__eb_unreserve_vma(ev->vma, ev->flags);
> +	ev->flags &= ~__EXEC_OBJECT_RESERVED;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  eb_validate_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  		struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry,
> @@ -933,13 +892,31 @@ eb_get_vma(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb, unsigned long handle)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void eb_release_vmas(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> +{
> +	const unsigned int count = eb->buffer_count;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		struct eb_vma *ev = &eb->vma[i];
> +		struct i915_vma *vma = ev->vma;
> +
> +		if (!vma)
> +			break;
> +
> +		eb->vma[i].vma = NULL;
> +
> +		if (ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN)
> +			__eb_unreserve_vma(vma, ev->flags);
> +
> +		i915_vma_put(vma);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void eb_destroy(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  {
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(eb->reloc_cache.rq);
>  
> -	if (eb->array)
> -		eb_vma_array_put(eb->array);
> -
>  	if (eb->lut_size > 0)
>  		kfree(eb->buckets);
>  }
> @@ -2022,12 +1999,9 @@ static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  			err = i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, eb->request, flags);
>  
>  		i915_vma_unlock(vma);
> -		eb_unreserve_vma(ev);
>  	}
>  	ww_acquire_fini(&acquire);
>  
> -	eb_vma_array_put(fetch_and_zero(&eb->array));
> -
>  	if (unlikely(err))
>  		goto err_skip;
>  
> @@ -2324,7 +2298,6 @@ static int eb_parse(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  	eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].vma = i915_vma_get(shadow);
>  	eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN;
>  	eb->batch = &eb->vma[eb->buffer_count++];
> -	eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].vma = NULL;
>  
>  	eb->trampoline = trampoline;
>  	eb->batch_start_offset = 0;
> @@ -2990,6 +2963,8 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>  		args->flags |= __EXEC_HAS_RELOC;
>  
>  	eb.exec = exec;
> +	eb.vma = (struct eb_vma *)(exec + args->buffer_count + 1);
> +	eb.vma[0].vma = NULL;
>  
>  	eb.invalid_flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_UNKNOWN_FLAGS;
>  	reloc_cache_init(&eb.reloc_cache, eb.i915);
> @@ -3199,6 +3174,8 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	if (batch->private)
>  		intel_gt_buffer_pool_put(batch->private);
>  err_vma:
> +	if (eb.exec)
> +		eb_release_vmas(&eb);
>  	if (eb.trampoline)
>  		i915_vma_unpin(eb.trampoline);
>  	eb_unpin_engine(&eb);
> @@ -3218,7 +3195,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>  
>  static size_t eb_element_size(void)
>  {
> -	return sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2);
> +	return sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2) + sizeof(struct eb_vma);
>  }
>  
>  static bool check_buffer_count(size_t count)
> @@ -3274,7 +3251,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  	/* Copy in the exec list from userland */
>  	exec_list = kvmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*exec_list),
>  				   __GFP_NOWARN | GFP_KERNEL);
> -	exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count, eb_element_size(),
> +	exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count + 1, eb_element_size(),
>  				    __GFP_NOWARN | GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (exec_list == NULL || exec2_list == NULL) {
>  		drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
> @@ -3351,7 +3328,8 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count, eb_element_size(),
> +	/* Allocate an extra slot for use by the command parser */
> +	exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count + 1, eb_element_size(),
>  				    __GFP_NOWARN | GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (exec2_list == NULL) {
>  		drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Failed to allocate exec list for %zd buffers\n",
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-10 10:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/24] drm/i915: Correct the locking hierarchy in gem Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11  9:33   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-11 12:11   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-12  7:56   ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/24] drm/i915: Revert relocation chaining commits Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 12:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 13:39   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 15:12   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-08-12 21:29   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/24] drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/24] drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 17:41   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/24] drm/i915: Parse command buffer earlier in eb_relocate(slow) Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 17:44   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/24] drm/i915: Use per object locking in execbuf, v12 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:59   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 12:58   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 14:18   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] dummy empty commit Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 14:58   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11  7:34   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-11 11:56     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/24] drm/i915: Use ww locking in intel_renderstate Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11  7:52   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/24] drm/i915: Add ww context handling to context_barrier_task Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11  8:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/24] drm/i915: Nuke arguments to eb_pin_engine Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11  8:12   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/24] drm/i915: Pin engine before pinning all objects, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:01   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/24] drm/i915: Rework intel_context pinning to do everything outside of pin_mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:14   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 10:38     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/24] drm/i915: Make sure execbuffer always passes ww state to i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:32   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-12 20:28     ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 11:54     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/24] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object/client_blt.c to use ww locking as well, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:39   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/24] drm/i915: Kill last user of intel_context_create_request outside of selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:41   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/24] drm/i915: Convert i915_perf to ww locking as well Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:53   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 11:57     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/24] drm/i915: Dirty hack to fix selftests locking inversion Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:58   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/24] drm/i915/selftests: Fix locking inversion in lrc selftest Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:59   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/24] drm/i915: Use ww pinning for intel_context_create_request() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:02   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/24] drm/i915: Move i915_vma_lock in the selftests to avoid lock inversion, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/24] drm/i915: Add ww locking to vm_fault_gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:16   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/24] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:31   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Correct the locking hierarchy in gem Patchwork
2020-08-10 10:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-08-10 11:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-08-11  8:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/24] " Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200811151200.GE2352366@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox