From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation"
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:12:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811151200.GE2352366@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810103103.303818-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:30:43PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This reverts commit 0f1dd02295f35dcdcbaafcbcbbec0753884ab974.
Needs some help with dim cite.
> With the WW locking, we will drop all references only at the
> end, so refcounting can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
The patch isn't a 1:1 revert, we've lost 3 lines in eb_move_to_gpu, but I
convinved myself that the cleanup path calling eb_release_vmas will take
care of that too, and hence this is a legit simplification. I guess maybe
wrongly squashed in change from one of the later patches, iirc. we've
discussed that there months ago.
Anyway, with the commit message ammended this is:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 124 +++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 12a130f92e72..7051af5ad8d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -41,11 +41,6 @@ struct eb_vma {
> u32 handle;
> };
>
> -struct eb_vma_array {
> - struct kref kref;
> - struct eb_vma vma[];
> -};
> -
> enum {
> FORCE_CPU_RELOC = 1,
> FORCE_GTT_RELOC,
> @@ -58,6 +53,7 @@ enum {
> #define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP BIT(29)
> #define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS BIT(28)
> #define __EXEC_OBJECT_INTERNAL_FLAGS (~0u << 28) /* all of the above */
> +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_RESERVED (__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN | __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE)
>
> #define __EXEC_HAS_RELOC BIT(31)
> #define __EXEC_INTERNAL_FLAGS (~0u << 31)
> @@ -295,7 +291,6 @@ struct i915_execbuffer {
> */
> int lut_size;
> struct hlist_head *buckets; /** ht for relocation handles */
> - struct eb_vma_array *array;
>
> struct eb_fence *fences;
> unsigned long num_fences;
> @@ -308,62 +303,8 @@ static inline bool eb_use_cmdparser(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> eb->args->batch_len);
> }
>
> -static struct eb_vma_array *eb_vma_array_create(unsigned int count)
> -{
> - struct eb_vma_array *arr;
> -
> - arr = kvmalloc(struct_size(arr, vma, count), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> - if (!arr)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - kref_init(&arr->kref);
> - arr->vma[0].vma = NULL;
> -
> - return arr;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void eb_unreserve_vma(struct eb_vma *ev)
> -{
> - struct i915_vma *vma = ev->vma;
> -
> - if (unlikely(ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE))
> - __i915_vma_unpin_fence(vma);
> -
> - if (ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN)
> - __i915_vma_unpin(vma);
> -
> - ev->flags &= ~(__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN |
> - __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE);
> -}
> -
> -static void eb_vma_array_destroy(struct kref *kref)
> -{
> - struct eb_vma_array *arr = container_of(kref, typeof(*arr), kref);
> - struct eb_vma *ev = arr->vma;
> -
> - while (ev->vma) {
> - eb_unreserve_vma(ev);
> - i915_vma_put(ev->vma);
> - ev++;
> - }
> -
> - kvfree(arr);
> -}
> -
> -static void eb_vma_array_put(struct eb_vma_array *arr)
> -{
> - kref_put(&arr->kref, eb_vma_array_destroy);
> -}
> -
> static int eb_create(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> {
> - /* Allocate an extra slot for use by the command parser + sentinel */
> - eb->array = eb_vma_array_create(eb->buffer_count + 2);
> - if (!eb->array)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - eb->vma = eb->array->vma;
> -
> if (!(eb->args->flags & I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT)) {
> unsigned int size = 1 + ilog2(eb->buffer_count);
>
> @@ -397,10 +338,8 @@ static int eb_create(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> break;
> } while (--size);
>
> - if (unlikely(!size)) {
> - eb_vma_array_put(eb->array);
> + if (unlikely(!size))
> return -ENOMEM;
> - }
>
> eb->lut_size = size;
> } else {
> @@ -511,6 +450,26 @@ eb_pin_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
> return !eb_vma_misplaced(entry, vma, ev->flags);
> }
>
> +static inline void __eb_unreserve_vma(struct i915_vma *vma, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!(flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN));
> +
> + if (unlikely(flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE))
> + __i915_vma_unpin_fence(vma);
> +
> + __i915_vma_unpin(vma);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +eb_unreserve_vma(struct eb_vma *ev)
> +{
> + if (!(ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN))
> + return;
> +
> + __eb_unreserve_vma(ev->vma, ev->flags);
> + ev->flags &= ~__EXEC_OBJECT_RESERVED;
> +}
> +
> static int
> eb_validate_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
> struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry,
> @@ -933,13 +892,31 @@ eb_get_vma(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb, unsigned long handle)
> }
> }
>
> +static void eb_release_vmas(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> +{
> + const unsigned int count = eb->buffer_count;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> + struct eb_vma *ev = &eb->vma[i];
> + struct i915_vma *vma = ev->vma;
> +
> + if (!vma)
> + break;
> +
> + eb->vma[i].vma = NULL;
> +
> + if (ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN)
> + __eb_unreserve_vma(vma, ev->flags);
> +
> + i915_vma_put(vma);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void eb_destroy(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> {
> GEM_BUG_ON(eb->reloc_cache.rq);
>
> - if (eb->array)
> - eb_vma_array_put(eb->array);
> -
> if (eb->lut_size > 0)
> kfree(eb->buckets);
> }
> @@ -2022,12 +1999,9 @@ static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> err = i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, eb->request, flags);
>
> i915_vma_unlock(vma);
> - eb_unreserve_vma(ev);
> }
> ww_acquire_fini(&acquire);
>
> - eb_vma_array_put(fetch_and_zero(&eb->array));
> -
> if (unlikely(err))
> goto err_skip;
>
> @@ -2324,7 +2298,6 @@ static int eb_parse(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].vma = i915_vma_get(shadow);
> eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN;
> eb->batch = &eb->vma[eb->buffer_count++];
> - eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].vma = NULL;
>
> eb->trampoline = trampoline;
> eb->batch_start_offset = 0;
> @@ -2990,6 +2963,8 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
> args->flags |= __EXEC_HAS_RELOC;
>
> eb.exec = exec;
> + eb.vma = (struct eb_vma *)(exec + args->buffer_count + 1);
> + eb.vma[0].vma = NULL;
>
> eb.invalid_flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_UNKNOWN_FLAGS;
> reloc_cache_init(&eb.reloc_cache, eb.i915);
> @@ -3199,6 +3174,8 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
> if (batch->private)
> intel_gt_buffer_pool_put(batch->private);
> err_vma:
> + if (eb.exec)
> + eb_release_vmas(&eb);
> if (eb.trampoline)
> i915_vma_unpin(eb.trampoline);
> eb_unpin_engine(&eb);
> @@ -3218,7 +3195,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>
> static size_t eb_element_size(void)
> {
> - return sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2);
> + return sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2) + sizeof(struct eb_vma);
> }
>
> static bool check_buffer_count(size_t count)
> @@ -3274,7 +3251,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> /* Copy in the exec list from userland */
> exec_list = kvmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*exec_list),
> __GFP_NOWARN | GFP_KERNEL);
> - exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count, eb_element_size(),
> + exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count + 1, eb_element_size(),
> __GFP_NOWARN | GFP_KERNEL);
> if (exec_list == NULL || exec2_list == NULL) {
> drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
> @@ -3351,7 +3328,8 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count, eb_element_size(),
> + /* Allocate an extra slot for use by the command parser */
> + exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count + 1, eb_element_size(),
> __GFP_NOWARN | GFP_KERNEL);
> if (exec2_list == NULL) {
> drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Failed to allocate exec list for %zd buffers\n",
> --
> 2.28.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-11 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 10:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/24] drm/i915: Correct the locking hierarchy in gem Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 9:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-11 12:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-12 7:56 ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/24] drm/i915: Revert relocation chaining commits Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 12:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 13:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 15:12 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-08-12 21:29 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/24] drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/24] drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 17:41 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/24] drm/i915: Parse command buffer earlier in eb_relocate(slow) Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 17:44 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/24] drm/i915: Use per object locking in execbuf, v12 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:59 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 12:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 14:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] dummy empty commit Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 14:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-11 11:56 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/24] drm/i915: Use ww locking in intel_renderstate Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 7:52 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/24] drm/i915: Add ww context handling to context_barrier_task Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 8:09 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/24] drm/i915: Nuke arguments to eb_pin_engine Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 8:12 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/24] drm/i915: Pin engine before pinning all objects, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:01 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/24] drm/i915: Rework intel_context pinning to do everything outside of pin_mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:14 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 10:38 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/24] drm/i915: Make sure execbuffer always passes ww state to i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:32 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-12 20:28 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 11:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/24] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object/client_blt.c to use ww locking as well, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:39 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/24] drm/i915: Kill last user of intel_context_create_request outside of selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:41 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/24] drm/i915: Convert i915_perf to ww locking as well Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:53 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 11:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/24] drm/i915: Dirty hack to fix selftests locking inversion Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:58 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/24] drm/i915/selftests: Fix locking inversion in lrc selftest Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:59 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/24] drm/i915: Use ww pinning for intel_context_create_request() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:02 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/24] drm/i915: Move i915_vma_lock in the selftests to avoid lock inversion, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:09 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/24] drm/i915: Add ww locking to vm_fault_gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:16 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/24] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:31 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Correct the locking hierarchy in gem Patchwork
2020-08-10 10:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-08-10 11:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-08-11 8:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/24] " Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200811151200.GE2352366@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox