From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation"
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:30:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810103103.303818-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810103103.303818-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
This reverts commit 0f1dd02295f35dcdcbaafcbcbbec0753884ab974.
With the WW locking, we will drop all references only at the
end, so refcounting can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 124 +++++++-----------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 12a130f92e72..7051af5ad8d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -41,11 +41,6 @@ struct eb_vma {
u32 handle;
};
-struct eb_vma_array {
- struct kref kref;
- struct eb_vma vma[];
-};
-
enum {
FORCE_CPU_RELOC = 1,
FORCE_GTT_RELOC,
@@ -58,6 +53,7 @@ enum {
#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP BIT(29)
#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS BIT(28)
#define __EXEC_OBJECT_INTERNAL_FLAGS (~0u << 28) /* all of the above */
+#define __EXEC_OBJECT_RESERVED (__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN | __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE)
#define __EXEC_HAS_RELOC BIT(31)
#define __EXEC_INTERNAL_FLAGS (~0u << 31)
@@ -295,7 +291,6 @@ struct i915_execbuffer {
*/
int lut_size;
struct hlist_head *buckets; /** ht for relocation handles */
- struct eb_vma_array *array;
struct eb_fence *fences;
unsigned long num_fences;
@@ -308,62 +303,8 @@ static inline bool eb_use_cmdparser(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
eb->args->batch_len);
}
-static struct eb_vma_array *eb_vma_array_create(unsigned int count)
-{
- struct eb_vma_array *arr;
-
- arr = kvmalloc(struct_size(arr, vma, count), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
- if (!arr)
- return NULL;
-
- kref_init(&arr->kref);
- arr->vma[0].vma = NULL;
-
- return arr;
-}
-
-static inline void eb_unreserve_vma(struct eb_vma *ev)
-{
- struct i915_vma *vma = ev->vma;
-
- if (unlikely(ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE))
- __i915_vma_unpin_fence(vma);
-
- if (ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN)
- __i915_vma_unpin(vma);
-
- ev->flags &= ~(__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN |
- __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE);
-}
-
-static void eb_vma_array_destroy(struct kref *kref)
-{
- struct eb_vma_array *arr = container_of(kref, typeof(*arr), kref);
- struct eb_vma *ev = arr->vma;
-
- while (ev->vma) {
- eb_unreserve_vma(ev);
- i915_vma_put(ev->vma);
- ev++;
- }
-
- kvfree(arr);
-}
-
-static void eb_vma_array_put(struct eb_vma_array *arr)
-{
- kref_put(&arr->kref, eb_vma_array_destroy);
-}
-
static int eb_create(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
{
- /* Allocate an extra slot for use by the command parser + sentinel */
- eb->array = eb_vma_array_create(eb->buffer_count + 2);
- if (!eb->array)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- eb->vma = eb->array->vma;
-
if (!(eb->args->flags & I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT)) {
unsigned int size = 1 + ilog2(eb->buffer_count);
@@ -397,10 +338,8 @@ static int eb_create(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
break;
} while (--size);
- if (unlikely(!size)) {
- eb_vma_array_put(eb->array);
+ if (unlikely(!size))
return -ENOMEM;
- }
eb->lut_size = size;
} else {
@@ -511,6 +450,26 @@ eb_pin_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
return !eb_vma_misplaced(entry, vma, ev->flags);
}
+static inline void __eb_unreserve_vma(struct i915_vma *vma, unsigned int flags)
+{
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!(flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN));
+
+ if (unlikely(flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE))
+ __i915_vma_unpin_fence(vma);
+
+ __i915_vma_unpin(vma);
+}
+
+static inline void
+eb_unreserve_vma(struct eb_vma *ev)
+{
+ if (!(ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN))
+ return;
+
+ __eb_unreserve_vma(ev->vma, ev->flags);
+ ev->flags &= ~__EXEC_OBJECT_RESERVED;
+}
+
static int
eb_validate_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry,
@@ -933,13 +892,31 @@ eb_get_vma(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb, unsigned long handle)
}
}
+static void eb_release_vmas(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+ const unsigned int count = eb->buffer_count;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+ struct eb_vma *ev = &eb->vma[i];
+ struct i915_vma *vma = ev->vma;
+
+ if (!vma)
+ break;
+
+ eb->vma[i].vma = NULL;
+
+ if (ev->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN)
+ __eb_unreserve_vma(vma, ev->flags);
+
+ i915_vma_put(vma);
+ }
+}
+
static void eb_destroy(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(eb->reloc_cache.rq);
- if (eb->array)
- eb_vma_array_put(eb->array);
-
if (eb->lut_size > 0)
kfree(eb->buckets);
}
@@ -2022,12 +1999,9 @@ static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
err = i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, eb->request, flags);
i915_vma_unlock(vma);
- eb_unreserve_vma(ev);
}
ww_acquire_fini(&acquire);
- eb_vma_array_put(fetch_and_zero(&eb->array));
-
if (unlikely(err))
goto err_skip;
@@ -2324,7 +2298,6 @@ static int eb_parse(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].vma = i915_vma_get(shadow);
eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN;
eb->batch = &eb->vma[eb->buffer_count++];
- eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].vma = NULL;
eb->trampoline = trampoline;
eb->batch_start_offset = 0;
@@ -2990,6 +2963,8 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
args->flags |= __EXEC_HAS_RELOC;
eb.exec = exec;
+ eb.vma = (struct eb_vma *)(exec + args->buffer_count + 1);
+ eb.vma[0].vma = NULL;
eb.invalid_flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_UNKNOWN_FLAGS;
reloc_cache_init(&eb.reloc_cache, eb.i915);
@@ -3199,6 +3174,8 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
if (batch->private)
intel_gt_buffer_pool_put(batch->private);
err_vma:
+ if (eb.exec)
+ eb_release_vmas(&eb);
if (eb.trampoline)
i915_vma_unpin(eb.trampoline);
eb_unpin_engine(&eb);
@@ -3218,7 +3195,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
static size_t eb_element_size(void)
{
- return sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2);
+ return sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2) + sizeof(struct eb_vma);
}
static bool check_buffer_count(size_t count)
@@ -3274,7 +3251,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
/* Copy in the exec list from userland */
exec_list = kvmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*exec_list),
__GFP_NOWARN | GFP_KERNEL);
- exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count, eb_element_size(),
+ exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count + 1, eb_element_size(),
__GFP_NOWARN | GFP_KERNEL);
if (exec_list == NULL || exec2_list == NULL) {
drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
@@ -3351,7 +3328,8 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
if (err)
return err;
- exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count, eb_element_size(),
+ /* Allocate an extra slot for use by the command parser */
+ exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(count + 1, eb_element_size(),
__GFP_NOWARN | GFP_KERNEL);
if (exec2_list == NULL) {
drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Failed to allocate exec list for %zd buffers\n",
--
2.28.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-10 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 10:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/24] drm/i915: Correct the locking hierarchy in gem Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 9:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-11 12:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-12 7:56 ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/24] drm/i915: Revert relocation chaining commits Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 12:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 13:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-10 10:30 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2020-08-11 15:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/24] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation" Daniel Vetter
2020-08-12 21:29 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/24] drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/24] drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 17:41 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/24] drm/i915: Parse command buffer earlier in eb_relocate(slow) Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 17:44 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/24] drm/i915: Use per object locking in execbuf, v12 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:59 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 12:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 14:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] dummy empty commit Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 14:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-11 11:56 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/24] drm/i915: Use ww locking in intel_renderstate Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 7:52 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/24] drm/i915: Add ww context handling to context_barrier_task Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 8:09 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/24] drm/i915: Nuke arguments to eb_pin_engine Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-11 8:12 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/24] drm/i915: Pin engine before pinning all objects, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:01 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/24] drm/i915: Rework intel_context pinning to do everything outside of pin_mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:14 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 10:38 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/24] drm/i915: Make sure execbuffer always passes ww state to i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:32 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-12 20:28 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 11:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/24] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object/client_blt.c to use ww locking as well, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:39 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/24] drm/i915: Kill last user of intel_context_create_request outside of selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:41 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/24] drm/i915: Convert i915_perf to ww locking as well Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:53 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-19 11:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/24] drm/i915: Dirty hack to fix selftests locking inversion Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:58 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/24] drm/i915/selftests: Fix locking inversion in lrc selftest Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 19:59 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/24] drm/i915: Use ww pinning for intel_context_create_request() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:02 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/24] drm/i915: Move i915_vma_lock in the selftests to avoid lock inversion, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:09 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/24] drm/i915: Add ww locking to vm_fault_gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:16 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/24] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-08-12 20:31 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-10 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Correct the locking hierarchy in gem Patchwork
2020-08-10 10:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-08-10 11:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-08-11 8:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/24] " Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200810103103.303818-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox