public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/61] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED for userptr
Date: Fri,  2 Oct 2020 14:58:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201002125939.50817-14-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201002125939.50817-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

We should not allow this any more, as it will break with the new userptr
implementation, it could still be made to work, but there's no point in
doing so.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |  2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |  4 ++
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h  |  2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c   | 64 ++++++-------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |  2 +
 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index ea2242f1b5b8..c30fa5790a47 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1966,8 +1966,10 @@ static noinline int eb_relocate_parse_slow(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
 		err = 0;
 	}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
 	if (!err)
 		flush_workqueue(eb->i915->mm.userptr_wq);
+#endif
 
 err_relock:
 	i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&eb->ww, true);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index 9b737eb231f2..358c3342343c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -514,7 +514,11 @@ void __i915_gem_object_invalidate_frontbuffer(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 static inline bool
 i915_gem_object_is_userptr(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
 	return obj->userptr.mm;
+#else
+	return false;
+#endif
 }
 
 static inline void
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
index dbb6f6171165..970d20b30ebd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
 	unsigned long *bit_17;
 
 	union {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
 		struct i915_gem_userptr {
 			uintptr_t ptr;
 
@@ -293,6 +294,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
 			struct i915_mmu_object *mmu_object;
 			struct work_struct *work;
 		} userptr;
+#endif
 
 		unsigned long scratch;
 		u64 encode;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
index 3fd63fdd7466..a2b7f6db2f1a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
 #include "i915_gem_object.h"
 #include "i915_scatterlist.h"
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER)
+
 struct i915_mm_struct {
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915;
@@ -24,7 +26,6 @@ struct i915_mm_struct {
 	struct rcu_work work;
 };
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER)
 #include <linux/interval_tree.h>
 
 struct i915_mmu_notifier {
@@ -217,15 +218,11 @@ i915_mmu_notifier_find(struct i915_mm_struct *mm)
 }
 
 static int
-i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
-				    unsigned flags)
+i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 {
 	struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn;
 	struct i915_mmu_object *mo;
 
-	if (flags & I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED)
-		return capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ? 0 : -EPERM;
-
 	if (GEM_WARN_ON(!obj->userptr.mm))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -258,38 +255,6 @@ i915_mmu_notifier_free(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn,
 	kfree(mn);
 }
 
-#else
-
-static void
-__i915_gem_userptr_set_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool value)
-{
-}
-
-static void
-i915_gem_userptr_release__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
-{
-}
-
-static int
-i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
-				    unsigned flags)
-{
-	if ((flags & I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED) == 0)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
-		return -EPERM;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static void
-i915_mmu_notifier_free(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn,
-		       struct mm_struct *mm)
-{
-}
-
-#endif
 
 static struct i915_mm_struct *
 __i915_mm_struct_find(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct mm_struct *real)
@@ -731,6 +696,8 @@ static const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops i915_gem_userptr_ops = {
 	.release = i915_gem_userptr_release,
 };
 
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Creates a new mm object that wraps some normal memory from the process
  * context - user memory.
@@ -771,12 +738,12 @@ i915_gem_userptr_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
 		       void *data,
 		       struct drm_file *file)
 {
-	static struct lock_class_key lock_class;
+	static struct lock_class_key __maybe_unused lock_class;
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
 	struct drm_i915_gem_userptr *args = data;
-	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
-	int ret;
-	u32 handle;
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object __maybe_unused *obj;
+	int __maybe_unused ret;
+	u32 __maybe_unused handle;
 
 	if (!HAS_LLC(dev_priv) && !HAS_SNOOP(dev_priv)) {
 		/* We cannot support coherent userptr objects on hw without
@@ -815,6 +782,9 @@ i915_gem_userptr_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
 	if (!access_ok((char __user *)(unsigned long)args->user_ptr, args->user_size))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
+	if (args->flags & I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
 	if (args->flags & I915_USERPTR_READ_ONLY) {
 		/*
 		 * On almost all of the older hw, we cannot tell the GPU that
@@ -824,6 +794,7 @@ i915_gem_userptr_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
 			return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
 	obj = i915_gem_object_alloc();
 	if (obj == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -845,7 +816,7 @@ i915_gem_userptr_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
 	 */
 	ret = i915_gem_userptr_init__mm_struct(obj);
 	if (ret == 0)
-		ret = i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(obj, args->flags);
+		ret = i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(obj);
 	if (ret == 0)
 		ret = drm_gem_handle_create(file, &obj->base, &handle);
 
@@ -856,10 +827,14 @@ i915_gem_userptr_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
 
 	args->handle = handle;
 	return 0;
+#else
+	return -ENODEV;
+#endif
 }
 
 int i915_gem_init_userptr(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
 	spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->mm_lock);
 	hash_init(dev_priv->mm_structs);
 
@@ -869,11 +844,14 @@ int i915_gem_init_userptr(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 				0);
 	if (!dev_priv->mm.userptr_wq)
 		return -ENOMEM;
+#endif
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 void i915_gem_cleanup_userptr(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
 	destroy_workqueue(dev_priv->mm.userptr_wq);
+#endif
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 7356bec35708..e5689eb2864a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -589,12 +589,14 @@ struct i915_gem_mm {
 	struct notifier_block vmap_notifier;
 	struct shrinker shrinker;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
 	/**
 	 * Workqueue to fault in userptr pages, flushed by the execbuf
 	 * when required but otherwise left to userspace to try again
 	 * on EAGAIN.
 	 */
 	struct workqueue_struct *userptr_wq;
+#endif
 
 	/* shrinker accounting, also useful for userland debugging */
 	u64 shrink_memory;
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-02 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-02 12:58 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/61] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/61] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/61] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/61] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/61] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/61] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/61] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/61] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/61] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/61] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/61] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 20:14   ` Ruhl, Michael J
2020-10-12 14:13     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-19 17:54       ` Ruhl, Michael J
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/61] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/61] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/61] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/61] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/61] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/61] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/61] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/61] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/61] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/61] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/61] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/61] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/61] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/61] drm/i915: Make intel_init_workaround_bb more compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/61] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/61] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/61] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/61] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/61] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/61] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/61] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/61] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/61] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/61] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/61] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/61] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/61] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/61] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 49/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 50/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 51/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 52/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 53/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 54/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 55/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 56/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 57/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 58/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 59/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 60/61] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 61/61] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 13:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Patchwork
2020-10-02 18:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-10-02 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/61] " Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201002125939.50817-14-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox